Nitroused383

iTrader: (10)

Not sure if this is already posted or not but this has some great info.
They dyno the stock cam, 224/230, 231/239, vindicator 240/244 and a custom 237/247 115 which made the most power. They also tested the fast 102 vs the LS6.

Great article: http://www.gmhightechperformance.com...est/index.html

Here is part 2 where they test a few more cams (futral cam motion grinds) and a set of new patriot predator heads
http://www.gmhightechperformance.com...est/index.html

Nitroused383

iTrader: (10)

With all the daily questions about "which cam should I run?", I assumed some people would like to see the difference in torque curves from stock, small and large cams?

toby

iTrader: (1)

it kills me how they gained 20.8 horsepower with the heads and say it's impressive. i would expect at least double that over some stock 241's.

pHEnomIC

iTrader: (14)

I might be a bit out of the loop, but it bugs me how no one has done a direct comparison between a stock l76 and a fast 102 without any other changes. (back to back) Itd be an easy job for a speed shop or anyone getting one installed to do.

mike c.

iTrader: (1)

PHEMONIC-I Posted long ago when i had l92 heads a l76 intake vs a 102 intake results. I gained like 2hp and that was all. It really did nothing on my car for the money,it is not better then a l76,at least not on my set up.People say it was because i used the 90mm-th body for both intakes and the 102mm th-body would of helped. But,i wanted to see what the intake did....NOTHING on my car.. I now have trickflow 235 and a mammo ported 102 on it and still using the 90mm th-body.The trickflow made a nice gain over the cnc l92 heads and worth spending the extra money on.

s346k

iTrader: (4)

awesome articles. i wonder about the 241s that were already on the car, though.

i also figure the monster 115 lsa cam would've had a much broader/smoother curve had they spent the time to optimally tune it. also...where is the trex? i want to see the decade old comp cam technology decimate!

the 21 hp gain from adding those heads is ridiculous. on a big cam only/fast 102 motor you could prob see 20 hp @ the crank from an underdrive pulley and removing the air filter.

Silver408z

iTrader: (1)

When I went from a ls6 to a fast 102 I gained 31 rwhp

redtail2426

iTrader: (10)

in the new one they test a couple more cams,with a lunati cam cranking out more power than any of the previous cams,it was like a 230/237 .600 .600 on a 113

barnac0

iTrader: (1)

I gained right about 60 rwhp when I switched from my ls6 to the Fast 102!

dannyz

Awsome gain's!

Latch

iTrader: (8)

Interesting read! Thanks for posting it.

barnac0

iTrader: (1)

Thunder Racing is the one who did it. I have my thread in the dyno section.

nightrunner06

iTrader: (1)

what happend with the TQ number? and how were the curves

barnac0

iTrader: (1)

Gained 30rwtq. Curves looked good to me. My graph is posted in the dyno section.


https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...ph-posted.html

xdanny510x

ported fast 102 or stock

barnac0

iTrader: (1)

Stock.