TSP Torquer v2 vs. v3 - Page 2 - LS1TECH

Log In 


Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

TSP Torquer v2 vs. v3

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-23-2011, 09:17 PM   #21
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 872
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z View Post
TV2 on a 111LSA, 108 ICL

Beat me to it. A T2 with the extra overlap will close the gap between these 2 cams to the point where it may not be worth the shorter spring life. I'm going with a h/c setup and will be going with this cam or something similar from EPS. IMO no use going with the super high lifts when the majority of the intake manifolds out there won't support any head flowing over 290cfm.

Check out these dyno results with an EPS 230/234 0.600/0.601 111LSA +2 with ported 5.3's still on an LS6 intake.

http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamo...o-numbers.html

Jason
Camaro99SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Guide to Hydraulic Valvetrain JakeFusion Generation III Internal Engine 36 07-26-2016 01:10 PM
What effects valve spring life? Grant B Generation III Internal Engine 9 04-24-2016 02:27 PM
Big lift cam vs. high ratio rockers 2edybrd Generation III Internal Engine 10 01-08-2016 08:43 PM
Spring Choice for 1.85 Roller Rockers redbird555 Generation III Internal Engine 31 07-31-2015 04:18 AM
LS7 Valve Springs & Pushrods for .660 Lift Cam Header Generation IV External Engine 11 08-08-2010 05:04 AM


Tags
cam, drivability, ls1cam, ls1tech, nitrous, range, rpm, springs, torque, torquer, touqer, tourquer, true, tsp, v2, v3, vs

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:08 AM.