LQ4/9 - 4.125 Stroke 4.060 Bore - Opinions
#1
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LQ4/9 - 4.125 Stroke 4.060 Bore - Opinions
What is everyones opinion on this setup? Is it easily doable? Will it hold up? I know the 4.060 bore will depend on how good the block is to start with. Will I have to clearance for the 4.125 stroke?
Also, what is the final CI of this setup?
Also, what is the final CI of this setup?
#2
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
a 4.125 stroke and a 4.060 bore size would make a 427 ci motor. if you were using a stock LQ block thats really its limit. i have never seen a STOCK LQ 4 inch bore turned more than .060 over so i dont think you would have a problem with it. and as far as the crank put it in and just clearance the block for the rods. the only thing is you would need to have pistons made for your setup.
#4
I agree with Predator, once you go longer than a 4" stroke your looking at a lot more work and more stress on the motor.....if you can go with a 4.030" bore you will have a 408, and room to bore/hone the block again later down the road.
#5
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm really not too concerned about being able to prep the block again on down the road. This motor wont see a lot of abuse and will be in a light weight truck. But I do want to get the most CI possible and still be reliable to drive often. What other work is needed to go to the 4.125" stroke? I was under the impression from some reading that with the right rods the block may not even need to be clearanced. I may have misunderstood or just plain be wrong. That's why I'm asking.
#6
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
I'm really not too concerned about being able to prep the block again on down the road. This motor wont see a lot of abuse and will be in a light weight truck. But I do want to get the most CI possible and still be reliable to drive often. What other work is needed to go to the 4.125" stroke? I was under the impression from some reading that with the right rods the block may not even need to be clearanced. I may have misunderstood or just plain be wrong. That's why I'm asking.
#7
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I will be having a machine shop build the motor for me. I'm not sure I understand your comment. If I'm not going to build it, what is not worth the hassle? It's just want I want, same as anybody else that loves hotrods and horsepower. The truck will just be a toy to drive pretty often. It will be a 1950 chevy.
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
as you increase the stroke, the piston travels further up and down. when it is traveling down, the skirt of the piston will travel out of the cylinder and rock back and forth, causing wear to the pistons. even a 4" stroke does this slightly. You will definitely need to clearance the block and windage tray, and also modify the oil pickup tube to get everything to fit.
stick with a 4" or less stroke. go with a 408, you wont even notice the 19cubic inches difference
stick with a 4" or less stroke. go with a 408, you wont even notice the 19cubic inches difference
#9
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
I will be having a machine shop build the motor for me. I'm not sure I understand your comment. If I'm not going to build it, what is not worth the hassle? It's just want I want, same as anybody else that loves hotrods and horsepower. The truck will just be a toy to drive pretty often. It will be a 1950 chevy.
#11
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: ohio
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
as you increase the stroke, the piston travels further up and down. when it is traveling down, the skirt of the piston will travel out of the cylinder and rock back and forth, causing wear to the pistons. even a 4" stroke does this slightly. You will definitely need to clearance the block and windage tray, and also modify the oil pickup tube to get everything to fit.
stick with a 4" or less stroke. go with a 408, you wont even notice the 19cubic inches difference
stick with a 4" or less stroke. go with a 408, you wont even notice the 19cubic inches difference
#12
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
He is saying it is not nearly as big of a deal, and probably does not hurt too much. From everything I have read and been told, the 4.125 stroke makes the pistons very short and the wrist pins get very close to the rings. If it were me, it may be worth it for a motor primarily used in a race application. For a street toy, I would not exceed 4 inches on an unsleeved block.
#13
I have an iron block with 4.07" bore filled with HardBlok up to the water pump ports. It has a 4.100" crank. 426.xxxx inches. I call it a 421 since I drive a Pontiac. I have had no porblems with it, but it does burn oil to the tune of a quart and a half every 4-5,000 miles. It has special Wiseco pistons designed for this application but I bet this is just a side effect of the short piston and coming so far out the bottom. I would really stay at 4" stroke if I did it again......