Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Torquer V2 or V3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-28-2012, 05:14 PM
  #1  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
 
MikeWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default Torquer V2 or V3

I was set on one of these cams but after reading the link below I am worried it may be too much cam. I want something that isnt going to lose power down low. I plan on running the stock heads because I dont want to spend alot of money. My goal is to break into the high 11's after a tune


http://www.ls1howto.com/index.php?article=23
Old 01-28-2012, 06:23 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
 
garygnu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,446
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

the torquer 2 has a little more low end.consider a 228r cam pkg from TSP with a 112 or 110LSA.
Old 01-28-2012, 06:51 PM
  #3  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
BrntWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Land of the FOID
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

On stock heads go with the V2. If you ever plan on changing heads V3. I run the V3 but with LS6 heads....with the proper tune the V3 is very daily driveable.
Old 01-28-2012, 07:04 PM
  #4  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
Floorman279's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 3,676
Received 157 Likes on 128 Posts

Default

yea go v2.....thats all the bigger id go with stock cubes/heads for a daily driver.......you will be happy with the v2
Old 01-29-2012, 05:25 PM
  #5  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
 
MikeWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I was thinking of keeping the heads stock because I dont want to replace the clutch and 10-bolt. If I just get the TV2 cam I can get away with keeping them stock.


It gets expensive because its about $800 for the cam/springs, probably $500 for labor and another $500 for a tune. Not sure if I want to put more than that into an older car ya know?
Old 01-29-2012, 06:31 PM
  #6  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
BrntWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Land of the FOID
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Yeah, you'll definately need a new clutch. Mine started slipping immediately after my H/C swap. I didn't even think about changing it for whatever reason, but that was another $1000 I wasn't expecting.
Old 01-29-2012, 07:08 PM
  #7  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
 
MikeWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I actually read on here the V3 has better low end. I am leaning towards the V2 still. Seems like less maintence.
Old 01-29-2012, 07:10 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
 
JUSTINSWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

that 1000 dollar clutch will be good for thousands of clutch drops lol how street able is the v3?
Old 01-29-2012, 07:13 PM
  #9  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
 
MikeWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Ill update after the swap and dyno. Any guesses? 380-390. It will be on a mustang dyno.
Old 01-29-2012, 07:34 PM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
TXZ28LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Classified
Posts: 6,164
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

The TV3 is supposed to be alot better overall cam than the T2. But i also have been considering a cam the size of the T2. Only reason i dont like the T3 is that huge lift..
Old 01-29-2012, 08:33 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
 
JUSTINSWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Get a tsp 233/239 both under .600 lift
Old 01-30-2012, 02:15 AM
  #12  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Johnnystock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,675
Received 38 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

The Tv3 is has better low end than the tv2 and has same mid n top or better. Its been explained by TSP many times on this board FYI. About the size, they're identical or so. Higher lift doesn't mean bigger cam at all, you just need better and more expensive valvesprings. Get the tv3 unless you want to save on valvesprings. No it doesn't need more maintenance, It's not even really true for mechanic roller setup.
My 700$ stage 3 monster clutch will hold any clutch dump, even on the juice N/A you will be fine
Old 01-30-2012, 03:23 AM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
gregrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 6,000+ feet
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by garygnu
the torquer 2 has a little more low end.consider a 228r cam pkg from TSP with a 112 or 110LSA.

Uuhhhhh, no
Old 01-30-2012, 06:49 AM
  #14  
TECH Regular
 
mebuildit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I put a V3 in my 6.0 with TSP 215 cnc ported heads. On the dyno it shows that it comes on around 2500 and pulls hard across the RPM range. I actually feel it by 3000rpm, and runs good.
I would suggest the V3 but not sure if your heads can flow that?
Old 01-30-2012, 06:09 PM
  #15  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
BrntWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Land of the FOID
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

There's no sense in getting the V3 with stock heads.
Old 01-30-2012, 08:37 PM
  #16  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
 
MikeWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I was orginally going to do TV2 cam with LS6 heads but I dont think the stock clutch/10 bolt would like that
Old 01-30-2012, 09:18 PM
  #17  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Camaro Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Monroe, Iowa
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The cam I have in my car is spec'd very similar to the V2 and I really like it. I don't daily drive my car, but the cam and 4.10's make it very fun to drive.
Old 01-30-2012, 09:44 PM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
 
trans_am7935's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Glen Burnie, MD
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

why are you dead set on these two cams?

i have seen a stock head LS1 make 400rwhp with the Torquer V2 plenty of time with the right supporting mods and good tune. but i would consider a more modern lobe cam such as the LSL lobed LSR cams. they are softer on the seat which saves your valves, springs and brings the valvetrain noise level down
Old 01-30-2012, 09:52 PM
  #19  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
 
MikeWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by trans_am7935
why are you dead set on these two cams?

i have seen a stock head LS1 make 400rwhp with the Torquer V2 plenty of time with the right supporting mods and good tune.
Thats pretty much why
Old 01-30-2012, 09:55 PM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
 
trans_am7935's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Glen Burnie, MD
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

any modern lobe cam in the high 220's low 230's these days will get you that. i love my cam and it is a 227/235. i have great low end power and outstanding top end with a advertised operating range from 1900-6600. i can drive this thing all day and feels like more power all over. the cam pulls hard to around 6500 with a shift point of around 6600-6700.


Quick Reply: Torquer V2 or V3



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:42 AM.