Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

AI 241/PatG cam???

Old 02-09-2012, 09:28 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
PUBLIC_FRENEMY_#1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default AI 241/PatG cam???

What do you think of this combo? Any guesses on power/suggestions?

AI 219cc 241s
222/228 .600 lift EPS cam
LS7 Lifters
LS2 Trays
LS2 HD timing set
Stock LS6 oil pump
Stock LS1 intake/ported throttle body
Stock 98 manifolds with magnaflow direct fit cats/catback
FTP lid/85mm MAF
stock rockers with trunnion upgrade
M6 with Texas Drivetrain stage 2 and diamond stage 2 clutch
10 bolt with 3.42 gears
42# SVO
Walbro 255

CA car so emissions equipment must stay...thanks!
Old 02-09-2012, 09:40 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
baalic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Amarillo
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

I say upgrade to a 12 bolt rear, otherwise looks to be a solid sporty combo, only other thing I think is a fast 90/90 setup or at least ls6 intake.
Old 02-09-2012, 10:51 PM
  #3  
Launching!
 
MTC_75vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Looks like a pretty solid set up...I would guess around 430-440 to the wheels. Let us know how it performs once you get it on the road. I will be running the same heads by summer and really and hoping you have good results.
Old 02-09-2012, 11:30 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes on 70 Posts

Default

It should do nice for an emission compliant setup. The intake and manifolds are gonna hold you back on the top end. I think a nice rear end and gear should be your next mod.
Old 02-10-2012, 12:20 AM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (9)
 
01cherryreds10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: IL
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I second the LS6 manifold. That's prolly gonna hold you back a little bit.
Old 02-10-2012, 12:37 AM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
PUBLIC_FRENEMY_#1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah I would like to do an ls6 intake I would just need to find an SLP intake or incorporate the EGR in the same fashion. Once the budget allows the rear end will get replaced but I need to get the car up and running first, it was purchased as a roller so there may be some unforeseen problems once everything is installed, you never know...
Old 02-10-2012, 05:26 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
baalic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Amarillo
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Im going to guess 360-380 on current setup. With longtubes, ls6 intake an UD pulley, then I could see the 430 hp somone above said. Just based on what other peoples set ups are.....
Old 02-10-2012, 06:14 PM
  #8  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
Camaro99SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I'd add a Flowmaster Y-merge collector to the Y pipe to eek out alittle extra flow for not much dough. Like an X pipe, it'll also make the exhaust sound better with less rasp.

IMO, I'm surprised Pat didn't recommend more duration on the exhaust side with stock manifolds to help compensate for that restriction. I guess there's no point with the stock intake.

Jason
Old 02-10-2012, 06:17 PM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (10)
 
usafws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: maryland
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Fast 102s are carb legal now
Old 02-10-2012, 06:26 PM
  #10  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
PUBLIC_FRENEMY_#1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by usafws6
Fast 102s are carb legal now
Are you serious?? Can you point me to a link or something? Thanks!!, if this pans out it might change things a bit although i have heard that the 102 throttle bodies are tough to tune...
Old 02-10-2012, 07:18 PM
  #11  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
mac62989's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 3,444
Received 27 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PUBLIC_FRENEMY_#1
Are you serious?? Can you point me to a link or something? Thanks!!, if this pans out it might change things a bit although i have heard that the 102 throttle bodies are tough to tune...
I dont think you need a 102 TB to use with a 102 intake..


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: AI 241/PatG cam???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:07 PM.