Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

ordered a 5.3 was sold a 4.8 how screwed am i going for 700 whp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-25-2012, 05:08 PM
  #1  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
lavoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default ordered a 5.3 was sold a 4.8 how screwed am i going for 700 whp

bought a 5.3 for my turbo build going for 700 wheel hp on pump gas and meth, tore the motor apart and it has flat top pistons so ran the part number on the crank and its a 4.8 , not sure if the salvage yard will take it back since i tore it apart so if they dont how will this affect my build, i know hot rod magazine ran into the same problem and made good power on a 4.8 but they didnt care if it blew up and as my daily driver and weekend racer i want to be sure.

Last edited by lavoy; 02-25-2012 at 05:18 PM.
Old 02-25-2012, 05:24 PM
  #2  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
getusumws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: olathe,ks
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Have you called them to find out if they will exchange it? did you not look at the casting to make sure it was a 5.3 before you tore into it ?
Old 02-25-2012, 05:48 PM
  #3  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
 
redtan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Belmont, MA
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Are you replacing the crank and bottom end on this? Or are you just throwing boost on the current engine?

I say this because the 4.8 block is the same as the 5.3 just with a shorter stroke, so if you're building it up it won't matter anyway as you can just get the correct stroke for the displacement you want.

If you're just keeping the bottom end as it is, I doubt you'll have a problem getting the power levels you want, but idk how a higher compression cast internals engine would hold up at the boost levels needed for 700rwhp.
Old 02-25-2012, 06:04 PM
  #4  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
lavoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

casting on the block is the same for a 4.8 and 5.3 they share the same block , that aside i ordered a 5.3 so its up to them to pull a 5.3 , and im leaving it stock, i tore the heads off to change the head gasket and put in arp studs and saw the flat pistons, the only way to tell a 4.8 from a 5.3 is the flat pistons vs the dished and the part number on the crank and the vin on the truck.
Old 02-25-2012, 06:10 PM
  #5  
TECH Apprentice
 
91sonomast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Murray, KY
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Hell I'd leave it be and continue on with your project. File the ring gaps and work your tune and boost up to 700hp
Old 02-25-2012, 06:31 PM
  #6  
That's MISTER MODERATOR
iTrader: (9)
 
Paul Bell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,585
Received 42 Likes on 36 Posts

Default

There's no replacement for displacement.

No doubt you can make the power with a turbo but if you keep it a 4.8, you'll always be wondering how much better it would be if you went with your originally planned 5.3.

I'd say as you're boosting, you should be looking for a forged crank anyway.
Old 02-25-2012, 06:58 PM
  #7  
DMM
TECH Fanatic
 
DMM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,756
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Chevy HP mag did a 5.3 twin turbo build to see how much it took to kill it, all they did was file the ring gap another .005"...it made 1200+ HP and blew out the spark from the factory truck coils at 27 psi. The editor noticed the flat top pistons in the pics and they tore it back down to confirm it was a 4.8.

Build the **** out of it and try to kill it...then do it again! You're fine. I will post the link when I get home.

Edit: My bad, it was the Hot Rod Mag build...http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/h...g_bang_theory/

Last edited by DMM; 02-25-2012 at 08:02 PM.
Old 02-25-2012, 07:01 PM
  #8  
DMM
TECH Fanatic
 
DMM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,756
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Oh...and they did over 60 pulls at 1200 HP before they ran out of time on the dyno.
Old 02-25-2012, 07:28 PM
  #9  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
lavoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by DMM
Oh...and they did over 60 pulls at 1200 HP before they ran out of time on the dyno.
i saw the article in hot rod that was pretty neat they did that. didnt know another mag did it to
Old 02-25-2012, 09:39 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Blk98Vert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'd prefer a 4.8 over a 5.3 for a turbo build
Old 02-25-2012, 10:53 PM
  #11  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,139
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

I agree... And like mentioned above, your getting close to wanting a forged rotating assembley (to be safe and make it last) so at that point you will have atleast a 5.3

I say slap the boost to it and see what it does...then hit her with some better internals and really crank it up.
Old 02-25-2012, 10:55 PM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
 
garygnu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,446
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

add more boost and spin it higher.sounds like a great project.
Old 02-26-2012, 02:58 AM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
chrisfrost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: phx the cactus patch
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

You tube someone boosted a 5.3L to 24lbs. and was showing 2000hp on the dyno ,,,,,,,,,,,,the 4.8L is just as tough if not tougher ,,,,,,,course You could'nt boost that much and expect it to last ,,,,,,,,,,,,but I would say yes 700 at the wheels would be pushin it a little but if You kept the rpm's under 6500 You should be able to keep it together for a while .
Old 02-26-2012, 03:32 AM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (19)
 
ryle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Morris, IL
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

**Dammit... DMM beat me to it...**


http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/h...g_bang_theory/

This is the above referenced Hot Rod Magazine article. Twin turbo setup on a stock bottom end produced 1200HP+.
Old 03-02-2012, 12:57 PM
  #15  
Launching!
iTrader: (7)
 
aQuickLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Spring, TX
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

There are some turbo 4.8l trucks running 10's in the 1/4 on the truck forum... with a stock bottom end. So I think 700rwhp is achievable.
Old 03-02-2012, 05:53 PM
  #16  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
pwrtrip75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 2,383
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

4.8 vs a 5.3 ... set up right you probably wouldnt notice the difference. Small cubes are not a bad thing at all.



Quick Reply: ordered a 5.3 was sold a 4.8 how screwed am i going for 700 whp



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:16 AM.