Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

fresh 5.3 rebuild 243s milled 40,xxx compresson problem

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-10-2012, 03:47 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
5.3 cutty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 119
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default fresh 5.3 rebuild 243s milled 40,xxx compresson problem

fresh rebuild with used ls7 lifters and 243s milled 40,xxx stock size comp pushrods.my problem is when the rocker is torqed down 2 cylinders have no compresson( only 2) back off the bolts on the 2 rockers a hair and they have compresson shop said it mite be the lifters not pumping down...anyone have an idea whats up with this...
Old 05-10-2012, 03:55 PM
  #2  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
PowellSixO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 176
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

You have milled heads and stock length pushrods? Did you measure for the pushrods? I would say that your pr's are too long, and you are holding the valves open.
Old 05-10-2012, 04:00 PM
  #3  
Teching In
 
Starkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PowellSixO
You have milled heads and stock length pushrods? Did you measure for the pushrods? I would say that your pr's are too long, and you are holding the valves open.
X2. If you mill them more than 20 thou, you're gonna have pushrod problems.

What kind of rockers? If stockers, are you using the GM rocker cradle?
Old 05-10-2012, 08:18 PM
  #4  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
5.3 cutty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 119
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

No i did not check the pr's to make sure it was right...but i know a guy thats running the same set up in a silverado on performance trucks.even if its only doing it on just 2 cylinders would make then to long??? Seems like none would have compresson not just 2.and i am running stock rockers and stands.Iwas told that those two lifters are pumped up and should let go when i spin the engine over to prime the oil pump.Would it make a diff if i put plugs in it and then spun it by hand to c if they will let go???
Old 05-10-2012, 08:32 PM
  #5  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Grimes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

i would save yourself a big headache later on, and just make sure you measure for the right length push rods right now.
Old 05-10-2012, 09:00 PM
  #6  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
5.3 cutty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 119
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Ya rookie mistake on my part
Old 05-11-2012, 03:54 PM
  #7  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
5.3 cutty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 119
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by PowellSixO
You have milled heads and stock length pushrods? Did you measure for the pushrods? I would say that your pr's are too long, and you are holding the valves open.
if i used the heads with out milling i would have needed a 7.450 pr but i milled the heasd 40,xxxs + useing the ls6 small base cam every thing should be right.
and if none of the cylinders had comp i would say its the pushrods but its only 2 im haveing problems with.also my comp cams is stock size.

Heres the post from gray matter from truck performance>>>>>
I also have dished pistons
Heads milled .040 with LS7 lifters used stock pushrods

The z06 cam has a smaller base circle which requires a shorter pushrod BUT milling the head takes up that space which is why i run a stock pushrod
Valve train is quiet.
I am sure it makes 310 at the wheels if not a lil more .
It runs just as good as my 212/218 and tr220 cam did
I made 300 with the 212/218 cam on stock heads 706 castings not the 243s
__________________
Old 05-11-2012, 04:19 PM
  #8  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Grimes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

dont remember how much smaller diameter the ls6cam base circle is off the top of my head. dont forget the pushrod length to make up for that diameter will only be half of the diameter though.
Old 05-11-2012, 06:27 PM
  #9  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (21)
 
mcdonald77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sedro Woolley, WA
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

When I assembled my heads L92's and block lq9 with the ls6 cam, I used 4.350. The engine was not decked and I was told the heads were not either. With 4.350 my valvetrain is a little nosiy on the interior using longtube headers, outside its not bad. I got 1.24 turns from 0 lash to 22ft pds.

(I used the comp cam magnum tool, then after installing the pushrods, bought the other comp cams push rods tool. The one thats 6.8 closed with .050 turns and it was still 4.350, I did measure not once, not twice, but more then three times)

Last edited by mcdonald77; 05-12-2012 at 10:17 AM.
Old 05-12-2012, 04:18 AM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Sometimes I wonder why you guys even mod your cars. Paper calculations are mostly just that, good on paper only!
Guys for the love of the Big Guy, MEASURE. MEASURE
Old 05-12-2012, 12:42 PM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Grimes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
Sometimes I wonder why you guys even mod your cars. Paper calculations are mostly just that, good on paper only!
Guys for the love of the Big Guy, MEASURE. MEASURE
Pretty much. All the time spent online searching and posting, the actual measuring could have been done already!
Old 05-14-2012, 09:03 AM
  #12  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
PowellSixO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 176
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

You can read posts all day long that say this or that, but it doesn't mean that they are right. You really should measure for the pr's, especially if you milled .040" off of the 243's. Also, if the heads were redone the valve lengths could be different on every single valve if they didn't know what they were doing. Hell even if they are stock heads they could be different. I just rebuilt a set of 799's that were 100% stock. After removing the valve stem seals, springs, and retainers I went through and measured the height of every valve, in the location that they originally came from. I measured from the spring seat to the top of the valve. The difference between each valve height varied .020" from one to another. After I cut the valve seats and refaced the valves they all stuck up a few more thousandths. I then went through and cut the top of every valve so that all of the valves were at the same height and matched my original overall average valve height. Moral of the story, if you milled .040" off the heads, and a couple of the valve lengths are off by .020", and you used 7.4" pr's when the stock length is really 7.38", then you could easily eat up all of your preload and hold a valve open (.040 + .020 + .020" = .080").
Old 05-14-2012, 09:50 AM
  #13  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (57)
 
lizeec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 753
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

When you say you only have NO compression on 2 cylinders, is it the same 2 cylinders each time you check, or if you rotate the engine which rotates the camshaft which will put some lifters on the base circle of the cam and some on the lobe ramp which will then create no compression in another cylinder due to the pr's being too long and holding the valve open? If you ask for help at least try to listen with open ears.



Quick Reply: fresh 5.3 rebuild 243s milled 40,xxx compresson problem



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:18 AM.