243/799 or L92 Heads?
#1
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Jonesboro, AR
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
243/799 or L92 Heads?
Im building a Jimmy Smith Motorsports rock bouncer chassis with a lq4 motor. The rig is 4x4 with one ton axles, 4.56-4.88 gear, th350 trans and atlas style transfer case with 43'' super swamper tires. Its going to weigh somewhere in the 3500# range. It will not see very much crawling speeds, it will be a hill climbing machine! These rigs are built for 90% of the time in use they are at WOT! My big question is what heads do you guys think will work the best for my application? i'm looking for somewhere between 5-550hp, as always the more the merrier! What do you think will need to be done to reach this goal?
#5
243 heads are a good option but I would still say to do the l92 heads. Your going to need air flow to make power. Compression doesn't add as much power as the amount of flow does. You have a much better designed stock intake to use that doesnt cost 1000s of dollars. Another good option is to get a set of stock ls2 pistons in your lq4 so you can raise your compression up.
Trending Topics
#9
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Far as the intake manifold argument the stock truck intake is decent if staying cathedral port. It is the true LS1 intake and worse yet LS4(FWD Impala) intake that are not so great.
The 317s have the same ports as 243s.
Take a closer look at what you have and consider massaging it to work. 500fwhp is not anything exotic these days. I think some porting on the 317s and a good cam can get you there. I believe it cost $200 extra to have the 317 chambers welded up so they can be CNC'd to 243 size, probably can't find a pair of 243 cores for that.
The 317s have the same ports as 243s.
Take a closer look at what you have and consider massaging it to work. 500fwhp is not anything exotic these days. I think some porting on the 317s and a good cam can get you there. I believe it cost $200 extra to have the 317 chambers welded up so they can be CNC'd to 243 size, probably can't find a pair of 243 cores for that.
#10
TECH Senior Member
Personally I would stick with cathedral due to the fact that they are less sensitive to cam choice (Like more versatile, L92/LS3 are more specific).
Plus from my experience, keep the valve-train as light as $$ possible to sustain high rpm without control issues.
I would look at a solid roller setup with heads to match (also modded to accept thick push-rods).
Plus from my experience, keep the valve-train as light as $$ possible to sustain high rpm without control issues.
I would look at a solid roller setup with heads to match (also modded to accept thick push-rods).
#11
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Jonesboro, AR
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the input guys, i have been thnking about doing the FAST 92mm intake and TB. Dont want to break the bank on this engine but also not afraid of paying for quality parts if thats going to be ther better route.
#12
listen to Pred-Z ,unless you do a custom cam for $425 .you mite get ls3 heads form SDPC for $650.you will need the matching intake for those ports.what will be the bore of your short block ?the l92/ls3 heads work best with bigger bores .if the valve is too close the cylinder wall you will hurt port flow and power.
#13
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Jonesboro, AR
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Forgot to mention i wont be able to use the stock intake because of clearence issues with the engine cover. thats why i was thinking the FAST intake and tb would be best since im goig to have to spend money on a intake anyway.
#14
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Jonesboro, AR
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#15
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Jonesboro, AR
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
listen to Pred-Z ,unless you do a custom cam for $425 .you mite get ls3 heads form SDPC for $650.you will need the matching intake for those ports.what will be the bore of your short block ?the l92/ls3 heads work best with bigger bores .if the valve is too close the cylinder wall you will hurt port flow and power.
#16
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
Cathedral will keep alot of the power and torque lower because of the higher velocity of the air charge, whereas the l92 heads with a larger intake runner have slower velocity bringing the power and torque up higher. So it depends on what you think youll see more of, low or high rpms.
#19
TECH Apprentice
If you will buy quality parts then I'd say contact Brian tooley, get a set of trick flow specialty 220 as cast and have him spec you a camshaft for what you have. He has all the parts you will need to make a solid performer out of your lq4 stock bottom end. After you are done mailing heads around the country( providing you do not have a builder close by) you will be money ahead. You can also get a fast from him and while its there he can port match it to the TFS heads. Talk with him. He will answer all your questions and it will be a one stop shop to reliable power.
There are many other choices as well, but I doubt any one will deny Brian will hook you up
There are many other choices as well, but I doubt any one will deny Brian will hook you up
#20
TECH Enthusiast
Most of the guys I see saying L92's or LS3's suck down low have other issues with their combos.
Martin at Tick use to be the same way until he actually started using them. Before, he had never fooled with them and would trash them and regurgitate the same bull posted by the close minded, but once he actually started using them, his opinion changed. I think he has some LSA's for his car now.
You can make power with them and it will not be all top end power either.
I have used both cath and square. Which one do I like better? Depends on what I am trying to accomplish and how much money I want to blow. I will say for the money, LS3's are tough to beat.