Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Installed Valve Spring Height

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-05-2013, 12:42 PM
  #1  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
high impact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Installed Valve Spring Height

I installed a G5X3 LG Motorsports (comp) cam with PAC 1519 springs, seats and retainers in my otherwise stock LS1 with 241 heads. I am currently setting up my valve train and have a question for the more experienced. I am a fan of quality beehive springs and believe that if they are set up correctly will provide better performance than duals. I hope I am able to learn something here and not have this thread turn into a bash beehive session.

My spring height using the stock spring seat is reading 1.792 and utilizing the PAC spring seat is reading 1.772. I know that the spring pressure specifications are provided at a 1.8 installed height. I have read that static height readings are somewhat tighter than after they are ran - that when the engine starts the spring seats the retainer even further into the keeper an additional .010 - .020, causing a loss in spring pressure. The stock spring seats are getting extremely close to the recommended 1.8 installed height but it appears to me that I'd be better with the PAC seats if they actually settle. I also think it would be good to have a little more spring pressure due to the lobes on this cam. Thoughts?

I've also read that whenever in doubt about seat pressure run a little more and not a little less. Am I safer to assume I should use the thicker seats in this situation. Of course double checking coil bind also to make sure I have clearance. If I am figuring my math correctly it puts coil bind at .062. Is this correct and sufficient clearance?

Anybody have any experience and recommendation with this? Thanks for helping!

Last edited by high impact; 08-05-2013 at 12:50 PM.
Old 08-05-2013, 12:57 PM
  #2  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,848
Received 307 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

Just set it up with .060" from coil bind and run it.
Old 08-05-2013, 01:15 PM
  #3  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
high impact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

spring specs:
150# at 1.800”
363# at 1.200”
.625” Max Lift
Coil Bind: 1.100"
75 grams

Can I simply double check that number by using a feeler gauge in between coils at full lift?

According to my math the thicker seats give me slightly over .060 coil bind. If I have this figured correctly... coil bind 1.1 plus .060 plus my actual highest lift .610 equals 1.77 for my final installed height. Appears I may be right on the ragged edge. Is there a tolerance since not every spring will be exact? Like =/- .010 or something like that? This also means I need to check every valve correct?

Last edited by high impact; 08-05-2013 at 02:20 PM.
Old 08-05-2013, 02:06 PM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
TurboBuick6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 666
Received 81 Likes on 51 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by high impact
Can I simply double check that number by using a feeler gauge in between coils at full lift?
Nope. Coil bind is not 0.060 between each coil. CB clearence is the sum of 0.060 between all coils. Since most springs do ned deflect the same amount in each coil, especially beehives, you cannot simple use a feeler gauge.

You must litteraly take each spring to solid height, this is your CB number. Add 0.060 to that number. Each one will be different. Now add the lift to that number. Now factor in every valve having a different installed height. Yes it gets to be a pain.
Old 08-05-2013, 02:25 PM
  #5  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
high impact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TurboBuick6
Nope. Coil bind is not 0.060 between each coil. CB clearence is the sum of 0.060 between all coils. Since most springs do ned deflect the same amount in each coil, especially beehives, you cannot simple use a feeler gauge.

You must litteraly take each spring to solid height, this is your CB number. Add 0.060 to that number. Each one will be different. Now add the lift to that number. Now factor in every valve having a different installed height. Yes it gets to be a pain.

That makes sense. PAC lists my springs coil bind at 1.1 so can I use that listed spec for all 16 springs? Is .060 a good margin? That means I am shooting for 1.77. What is my spring height tolerance?
Old 08-06-2013, 04:21 AM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
vettenuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Little Rhody
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Do you mean installed height or free height. You should be able to keep the installed height pretty close. I don't recall the exact numbers but mine were within +/- 0.010" installed height and may have actually been closer. I set everthing up in a spread sheet and monitored each valve set as I did them so I could look over both heads when I was done. In included clearance to coil bind and also clearance between the retainer and the valve seal, something that a few have overlooked and then hammered the seals when they ran the motor. Having a shim kit available my be required as well unless you are going just with the seat.

Also, with regards to seat value, having a little too much seat force won't kill a valve train but having too little could. I wouldn't worry about the 1.800" but rather the final seat force of the spring. I can't recall any of the heads I have worked on being at 1.800", they are always at a shorter installed height including stock heads.
Old 08-06-2013, 12:10 PM
  #7  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 137 Likes on 114 Posts

Default

I have a related question: I have heads setup by TEA with PAC dual springs. If I remove the springs to install checker springs, and I reinstall the springs, should I recheck them? Or would simple removal of the retainer and spring and reinstallation cause a change in height?
Old 08-06-2013, 12:43 PM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
TurboBuick6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 666
Received 81 Likes on 51 Posts

Default

If you do not remove any shim the installed height should not change. With OE locks I do not know if this would be the case but any aftermarket machined lock will be identical (it should be at least).
Old 08-06-2013, 01:11 PM
  #9  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 137 Likes on 114 Posts

Default

Yeah, they are aftermarket from what I can tell. When they installed the 1904s, they shimmed them for 160 seat pressure.



Quick Reply: Installed Valve Spring Height



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:13 AM.