Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

5.3 heads on 5.7 LS

Old 01-25-2014, 03:36 PM
  #1  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
MaroonMonsterLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Iowa
Posts: 3,533
Received 1,208 Likes on 775 Posts

Default 5.3 heads on 5.7 LS

I know an old school trick with SBC was to put 305 heads on a 350, port em, and put in bigger valves. These would boost compression and still flow pretty well.

Is this a direct bolt on like it was in the good ol days? I want some practice porting heads anyway and figured i could pick up some 5.3 heads pretty easily for cheap.
Old 01-25-2014, 04:29 PM
  #2  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
.boB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 897
Received 33 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Yes, they're a direct bolt on. The advantage is that they have a smaller chamber, and bumps up the compression. The down side is that they have small valves. You can port them as much as you want, but unless you put bigger valves in they won't flow as well as stock 243's.

http://texas-speed.com/p-1172-prc-st...-castings.aspx

I'll be using a set of these, but with different springs to match the cam I'll be using .

Last edited by .boB; 01-25-2014 at 04:46 PM.
Old 01-25-2014, 04:46 PM
  #3  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
MaroonMonsterLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Iowa
Posts: 3,533
Received 1,208 Likes on 775 Posts

Default

Yup, sounds just like it used to be. Bigger valves shouldn't be too big of deal, but the compression bump will be nice
Old 01-25-2014, 08:13 PM
  #4  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (37)
 
01WS6/tamu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: somewhere in TX
Posts: 4,902
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

I had a 06 chevy pu I put a budget 5.7 LS1 into and threw the stock 5.3 heads off the truck on the LS1 with no mods and a super baby cam. It was one of the best running LS1's ive driven outside of one with heavy mods. I sold the truck and the motor wound up back in a buddy's TA and he swears it would run circles around the stock LS1. So in a nutshell for a poorboy job with 0 high performance aftermarket parts the trick still applies
Old 01-25-2014, 08:22 PM
  #5  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 137 Likes on 114 Posts

Default

5.3s are pretty cheap from the likes of TSP or AI. And in ported configurations you can see 45-50rwhp.
Old 01-26-2014, 10:02 AM
  #6  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

which 5.3l heads? the later ones actually got "LS6 heads" 243/799 castingsnot as small a chamber as the earlier heads but smaller chamber than the LS1 and better flow.

An earlier 5.3l might have 862 or 706 heads yes they have a small chamber for great compression but some of the 706s have porosity issues.

So which casting are you looking at?
Old 01-26-2014, 10:16 AM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

OP, i'm running PRC 5.3 heads (862 casting on a 61 cc) from Texas Speed. They have the bigger valves, port and polish, etc...for the money they do really well once they are worked over good
Old 02-02-2014, 01:48 PM
  #8  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
LS1HIGHLIFE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Williamsburg, VA
Posts: 780
Received 1 Like on 1 Post


Default

Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
which 5.3l heads? the later ones actually got "LS6 heads" 243/799 castingsnot as small a chamber as the earlier heads but smaller chamber than the LS1 and better flow.

An earlier 5.3l might have 862 or 706 heads yes they have a small chamber for great compression but some of the 706s have porosity issues.

So which casting are you looking at?
Can you elaborate more on the issues with the 706 heads? I've been running them for a few yrs now. Only issue I have is burning oil. I've since converted to LS6 PCV and will be replacing the vale seals soon.
Old 02-02-2014, 02:10 PM
  #9  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Google Castech and you will find more info than I can offer. It was only some of the 706s made by one of the manufacturers.
Old 02-02-2014, 02:53 PM
  #10  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
LS1HIGHLIFE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Williamsburg, VA
Posts: 780
Received 1 Like on 1 Post


Default

Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
Google Castech and you will find more info than I can offer. It was only some of the 706s made by one of the manufacturers.
Mine are Castech heads. I haven't had these problems. I did find a thread where on guy mentioned it was Castech's other casting that had the issues, not the 706s.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/13917658-post2.html
Old 02-02-2014, 04:33 PM
  #11  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

That is the only time I have seen anyone suggest that, EVERYTHING else I have read says it was the 706 that was the issue and not even all of the castech 706s just some.
Old 03-27-2018, 09:31 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
Js4718's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 01WS6/tamu
I had a 06 chevy pu I put a budget 5.7 LS1 into and threw the stock 5.3 heads off the truck on the LS1 with no mods and a super baby cam. It was one of the best running LS1's ive driven outside of one with heavy mods. I sold the truck and the motor wound up back in a buddy's TA and he swears it would run circles around the stock LS1. So in a nutshell for a poorboy job with 0 high performance aftermarket parts the trick still applies
What other mods were done or required? Was the computer reprogrammed? Long tube headers? Stock compression or changed?
I have built a 5.7 ls from an iron block with 706 heads(changed springs), flat top pistons, mild truck cam, full length pacesetter headers. Stock program, air intake, intake manifold, throttle body and valves. Exhaust is currently open and it seems sluggish for what it is. Not sure if finishing the exhaust will fix it or if it needs other things. Stock converter also, I didn't go to a higher stall.
Old 03-27-2018, 09:43 PM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 20,862
Received 3,017 Likes on 2,348 Posts
Default

Keep in mind this is a 4-yr. old thread. You MIGHT get an answer.
Old 11-07-2023, 06:38 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
chaseamb05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2023
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

When you say direct bolt on do you mean I will be able to use the same intake manifold on the 350 or will I have to buy a new one
Old 11-07-2023, 09:48 PM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
 
RB04Av's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,467
Received 596 Likes on 411 Posts
Default

Not sure what you mean "same intake manifold on the 350".

This is a LSx motor forum. There are no "350" motors on here.

Apart from that, yes, if you have some one or another LS type motor (4.8 / 5.3 / 5.7 / 6.0) in the early 2000s kind of age range, then yes,


will be able to use the same intake manifold
Not the same deal as the old small block Chevy 350, but the principles aren't that much different. The bore & stroke inside the block might change but the external dimensions of bolt-on parts like the intake manifold remain the same within the family.
The following users liked this post:
G Atsma (11-07-2023)


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 5.3 heads on 5.7 LS



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:00 AM.