Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

PRC 2.5 5.3 vs PRC 215 heads.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-06-2014, 09:17 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
mchdg86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Tulsa OK
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default PRC 2.5 5.3 vs PRC 215 heads.

I have the 2.3 5.3 heads right now and while they are performing great I feel they are the next bottle neck in my set up. How much should the PRC 215s give me over the 5.3 heads?
Old 07-06-2014, 09:36 PM
  #2  
11 Second Club
 
prokilllsx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ohio
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Knowing your setup might be helpful
Old 07-06-2014, 10:00 PM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
mchdg86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Tulsa OK
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by prokilllsx
Knowing your setup might be helpful
My complete setup is in my sig. Is it not visible? If not its 102 mm CIA, ported LS2 tb, mamo ported fast 102, PRC 2.5 5.3 heads milled to 62cc, 222/230 111+1 cam, 1-7/8 headers, catless x-pipe.
Old 07-07-2014, 12:18 AM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
TXZ28LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Classified
Posts: 6,164
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Id prolly go with a bigger cam over the heads.

Im sure the PRC 215 are waaaay better overall. But surprisingly i havent seen much run those heads.

The 5.3 have performed well for lots of members on here.
Old 07-07-2014, 09:58 AM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

In my opinion, the gain would not be worth the cost. I'd stick with what you have, or have your existing heads hand ported.
Old 07-07-2014, 10:12 AM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
427zm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Georgetown, Tx
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Gain isn't worth the cost, a bigger bump stick will lend you better results. A Martin@tick, patG, EPS, Brian Tooley, or Ed Curtis bump stick will get you the best bang for the buck results.
Old 07-07-2014, 10:15 AM
  #7  
TECH Addict
 
MikeWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mchdg86
I have the 2.3 5.3 heads right now and while they are performing great I feel they are the next bottle neck in my set up. How much should the PRC 215s give me over the 5.3 heads?
I wouldnt change a thing in that setup with the power you are making. Maybe look into a procharger w/meth if you want more power. 464rwhp is awesome for those mods and I bet the car makes power everywhere with that cam.
Old 07-07-2014, 10:16 AM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MikeWS6
I wouldnt change a thing in that setup with the power you are making. Maybe look into a procharger w/meth if you want more power. 464rwhp is awesome for those mods and I bet the car makes power everywhere with that cam.
That's what I was thinking too. After seeing those numbers, I'd be thrilled with them considering those heads are budget heads.
Old 07-07-2014, 10:44 AM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

You could just spray it if you want a cheap boost in power, otherwise I wouldn't even touch the heads
Old 07-07-2014, 11:53 AM
  #10  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 137 Likes on 114 Posts

Default

I might swap the cam for a slightly larger cam... but then you'd only pick up 10-15rwhp. The cost would be about the same as a cheap wet nitrous kit. And you could pickup 75-150 with that.
Old 07-07-2014, 12:26 PM
  #11  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
mchdg86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Tulsa OK
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I'm not completely opposed to swapping the cam out also for a bigger but not donkey dick sized cam. The main reason for wanting to change heads is that the setup is a bit over 5 years old minus the intake. Would it be plausible to gain 20-25 hp with a better set of heads and say a 234/242 cam?
Old 07-07-2014, 12:55 PM
  #12  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 137 Likes on 114 Posts

Default

Yes. Your cam now is pretty mild, so adding 10 degrees of duration to intake/exhaust... it certainly won't drive as nice, but it will make more power. And the heads could definitely add to that. Although, I'm not sure the heads need a wide split. You might be able to do a 235/238 111 cam with the PRC 215s and make 480-490.
Old 07-07-2014, 01:31 PM
  #13  
11 Second Club
 
SoFla01SSLookinstok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,541
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mchdg86
I'm not completely opposed to swapping the cam out also for a bigger but not donkey dick sized cam. The main reason for wanting to change heads is that the setup is a bit over 5 years old minus the intake. Would it be plausible to gain 20-25 hp with a better set of heads and say a 234/242 cam?
I went with the PRC 215's after researching & only seeing good things. I bet you would easily gain 20-25 hp going with the 215's & a bigger cam. I'd say slap the heads on & see what you gain.
Old 07-07-2014, 01:45 PM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
mchdg86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Tulsa OK
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

What kind of numbers did your setup put down?
Old 07-08-2014, 12:45 PM
  #15  
10 Second Club
 
VandykeT/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hurley, VA
Posts: 2,317
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

490 with a MS4/PRC 215s. Peaked at 6900.
Old 07-08-2014, 01:17 PM
  #16  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
mchdg86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Tulsa OK
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by VandykeT/A
490 with a MS4/PRC 215s. Peaked at 6900.
Is your fast ported or stock?
Old 07-08-2014, 02:25 PM
  #17  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by VandykeT/A
490 with a MS4/PRC 215s. Peaked at 6900.
That's pretty damn stout right there. If that FAST isn't ported, I bet with a good port job, 500 rwhp would be no problem.
Old 07-08-2014, 02:28 PM
  #18  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 137 Likes on 114 Posts

Default

I just started thinking about this again... if you go with the PRC 227s and something like the FTI Hellraiser 236/240 111, I think you'd hit 500. You can do the PRC 227s with a 60cc chamber and keep stock PtV clearance...
Old 07-08-2014, 02:47 PM
  #19  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

The FTI Hellraiser is 229/236 111 .631/.631

I think you mean the Streetsweeper.
Old 07-08-2014, 02:51 PM
  #20  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 137 Likes on 114 Posts

Default

Yes. That's the one. I had the duration right.


Quick Reply: PRC 2.5 5.3 vs PRC 215 heads.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:16 PM.