Ported OEM 4.8/5.3 liter heads----solid results!
#1
LS1Tech Sponsor
Thread Starter
Ported OEM 4.8/5.3 liter heads----solid results!
Guys,
Just did a set of 4.8/5.3 liter heads for a customer's project that turned out really well. They were pretty dirty when I got them.....I sonic cleaned the castings and R&R'ed the guides....basically threw away ALL the stock hardware including the valves. I ended up going with a 1.950 intake valve and a 1.570 exhaust. Fitted them with high quality PAC springs when I was done.....they really came out excellent considering the size of the finished port (213 cc), the small bore I flowed them on (3.900) and the intake valve that's almost the same size as some of the BBC exhaust valves I play with!!
Picture of one of the heads on the flowbench.....
Flownumbers on a 3.900 bore fixture
Lift.....Int.....Exh
.200....134....109
.300....191....156
.400....245....191
.500....276....215
.550....287....223
.600....294....229
Pretty impressive piece all things considered
In fact these results have prompted me to want to implement a new small valve head in an aftermarket casting (AFR) specifically targeting these small bore engines that are littered in salvage yards across the country and can usually be had extremely cheap.
Im targeting a finished volume of 200-205 cc's in the more efficient aftermarket casting and Im hoping it clears 300 CFM as well with really strong low and midlift numbers for its valve/port size.
Should have this program wrapped up sometime in March/April and will be testing it shortly after on the dyno using a a stock 5.3 liter shortblock.
Im actually looking forward to this testing and have an idea of what I would like to see for the final results with a baby cam (low 220's @ .050) and a ported LSXRT. Should be interesting
I will keep you guys posted
-Tony
Just did a set of 4.8/5.3 liter heads for a customer's project that turned out really well. They were pretty dirty when I got them.....I sonic cleaned the castings and R&R'ed the guides....basically threw away ALL the stock hardware including the valves. I ended up going with a 1.950 intake valve and a 1.570 exhaust. Fitted them with high quality PAC springs when I was done.....they really came out excellent considering the size of the finished port (213 cc), the small bore I flowed them on (3.900) and the intake valve that's almost the same size as some of the BBC exhaust valves I play with!!
Picture of one of the heads on the flowbench.....
Flownumbers on a 3.900 bore fixture
Lift.....Int.....Exh
.200....134....109
.300....191....156
.400....245....191
.500....276....215
.550....287....223
.600....294....229
Pretty impressive piece all things considered
In fact these results have prompted me to want to implement a new small valve head in an aftermarket casting (AFR) specifically targeting these small bore engines that are littered in salvage yards across the country and can usually be had extremely cheap.
Im targeting a finished volume of 200-205 cc's in the more efficient aftermarket casting and Im hoping it clears 300 CFM as well with really strong low and midlift numbers for its valve/port size.
Should have this program wrapped up sometime in March/April and will be testing it shortly after on the dyno using a a stock 5.3 liter shortblock.
Im actually looking forward to this testing and have an idea of what I would like to see for the final results with a baby cam (low 220's @ .050) and a ported LSXRT. Should be interesting
I will keep you guys posted
-Tony
__________________
www.mamomotorsports.com
Tony@MamoMotorsports.com
Anything worth doing is worth doing well. Build it right the first time....its alot cheaper than building it twice!!
www.mamomotorsports.com
Tony@MamoMotorsports.com
Anything worth doing is worth doing well. Build it right the first time....its alot cheaper than building it twice!!
#2
TECH Veteran
Seem to have a lot of time invested in those and great work as always.
#6
LS1Tech Sponsor
Thread Starter
Most of the OEM heads I do usually run about 2K all said and done with aftermarket larger valves typically installed but I would put any of them up against any other ported stock head, both on the flowbench and on the dyno and at the track.
Redtan....you asked about 243 and LS3 heads. I already have a program for both. Normally get a legit 310+ CFM out of my CNC/hand finished 243 castings (real world flow numbers), and my LS3 heads I get around 360-365 CFM. In fact my 2nd Gen CTSV I ported a set of OEM LS3 heads for and spent a bunch of time on those (pushed those castings to 368-370 CFM).....but now I usually advise my customers to let me rework the more efficient TFS LS3 castings and I get 390-395 CFM from those (BIG #'s).....they simply werent on the market yet when I took on my personal LS3 based build or I would have clearly went that direction.
Regardining my future small valve/small bore dedicated AFR 205, it will flow and make more power than any reworked OEM casting on the planet not to mention feature a stouter deck and be alot more efficient but the cost of the better castings and high quality components will end up placing the final cost of the product exactly where you would expect....in the $2500 range in out of the box trim.....more if your looking for some of the extra Mamo loving to not leave a single CFM on the table.
I will be dyno testing a set of these heads on a stock 5.3.....should make for a really interesting day. I will be finishing the test with a ported FAST LSXRT as alot of the actual applications of this head might actually consider running one. I'm hoping to get this thing close to 500 HP with a small user friendly/daily driver type hyd roller. That would make the daily commute in your Tahoe alot more fun.....LOL
Anyway....getting ahead of myself but I suspect these heads are going to really work well, especially for the target audience I have in mind and the exhaust port is going to be pretty stout as well which should help the guys that are going turbo etc.
Good stuff.....I'm actually pretty excited about this new program
Regards,
Tony
__________________
www.mamomotorsports.com
Tony@MamoMotorsports.com
Anything worth doing is worth doing well. Build it right the first time....its alot cheaper than building it twice!!
www.mamomotorsports.com
Tony@MamoMotorsports.com
Anything worth doing is worth doing well. Build it right the first time....its alot cheaper than building it twice!!
Trending Topics
#9
LS1Tech Sponsor
Thread Starter
Your welcome....it was good meeting up with you and your Dad.
Let me know when your ready to start accumulating more pieces of the puzzle!
I was hoping you might see this post!....LOL
(Dan is the owner of the heavily modified OEM heads I have featured in this thread!)
Cheers,
Tony
__________________
www.mamomotorsports.com
Tony@MamoMotorsports.com
Anything worth doing is worth doing well. Build it right the first time....its alot cheaper than building it twice!!
www.mamomotorsports.com
Tony@MamoMotorsports.com
Anything worth doing is worth doing well. Build it right the first time....its alot cheaper than building it twice!!
#11
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
Damn. I have been pushing for something like this for years.
I am really excited to see how everything turns out.
If you need anything For this let me know. I would be willing to work with you to further the small bore stuff especially for the truck market. Feel free to send me a PM.
I am really excited to see how everything turns out.
If you need anything For this let me know. I would be willing to work with you to further the small bore stuff especially for the truck market. Feel free to send me a PM.
#12
We 4.8/5.3 swap guys need a great small bore head to keep pushing the hp numbers up and the ETs down. Many builds start on a budget but later down the road we all want to go faster. I love that Wiesco has seen the swap niche and offers off the shelf forged pistons even though our choices are few at least we have some. Now to get a head choice other than stock castings, especially from my favorite company AFR, is exciting to the 4.8/5.3 community. Need those thick decks to push the psi even higher. Can't wait!!
#13
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Coast of San Mateo County Between Pacifica & HMB
Posts: 1,815
Received 215 Likes
on
128 Posts
88lt1
Actually it is Tony's new Company MMS which is carrying the ball
On this project, not his former employer AFR. But since Tony
Was the head designer responsible for all of AFR's LS Cylinder
Head development, even better!
Actually it is Tony's new Company MMS which is carrying the ball
On this project, not his former employer AFR. But since Tony
Was the head designer responsible for all of AFR's LS Cylinder
Head development, even better!
#14
LS1Tech Sponsor
Thread Starter
Thanks for that clarification!
I am still working on my small valve cathedral head aimed squarely at the 4.8/5.3 crowd....looks to be coming in at a finished volume in the low 200's. I will update you guys on flow numbers and final cc's when its all sorted out but I have made alot of progress so far.
It will have a 1.940 intake valve and a 1.570 exhaust....I figure with everything I have on my plate right now its about two months away which isn't too bad.
Will start a thread dedicated to that program with information as soon as its available.
Also, a few guys have asked me for more details about my new MMS 220 heads. I will be posting an official thread with facts and figures surrounding that product shortly....wanting to flow a few more pieces before posting the flow numbers but suffice to say that in out of the box trim (without my hand finishing), its better than a "Mamofied" AFR 215 and I have made big power on numerous builds with that head (my goal was to be just as good in out of the box trim so I'm very pleased). I'm expecting the new 220's to perform very well.....keep you guys posted
Regards,
Tony
__________________
www.mamomotorsports.com
Tony@MamoMotorsports.com
Anything worth doing is worth doing well. Build it right the first time....its alot cheaper than building it twice!!
www.mamomotorsports.com
Tony@MamoMotorsports.com
Anything worth doing is worth doing well. Build it right the first time....its alot cheaper than building it twice!!
#15
Dan,
Thanks for that clarification!
I am still working on my small valve cathedral head aimed squarely at the 4.8/5.3 crowd....looks to be coming in at a finished volume in the low 200's. I will update you guys on flow numbers and final cc's when its all sorted out but I have made alot of progress so far.
It will have a 1.940 intake valve and a 1.570 exhaust....I figure with everything I have on my plate right now its about two months away which isn't too bad.
Will start a thread dedicated to that program with information as soon as its available.
Also, a few guys have asked me for more details about my new MMS 220 heads. I will be posting an official thread with facts and figures surrounding that product shortly....wanting to flow a few more pieces before posting the flow numbers but suffice to say that in out of the box trim (without my hand finishing), its better than a "Mamofied" AFR 215 and I have made big power on numerous builds with that head (my goal was to be just as good in out of the box trim so I'm very pleased). I'm expecting the new 220's to perform very well.....keep you guys posted
Regards,
Tony
Thanks for that clarification!
I am still working on my small valve cathedral head aimed squarely at the 4.8/5.3 crowd....looks to be coming in at a finished volume in the low 200's. I will update you guys on flow numbers and final cc's when its all sorted out but I have made alot of progress so far.
It will have a 1.940 intake valve and a 1.570 exhaust....I figure with everything I have on my plate right now its about two months away which isn't too bad.
Will start a thread dedicated to that program with information as soon as its available.
Also, a few guys have asked me for more details about my new MMS 220 heads. I will be posting an official thread with facts and figures surrounding that product shortly....wanting to flow a few more pieces before posting the flow numbers but suffice to say that in out of the box trim (without my hand finishing), its better than a "Mamofied" AFR 215 and I have made big power on numerous builds with that head (my goal was to be just as good in out of the box trim so I'm very pleased). I'm expecting the new 220's to perform very well.....keep you guys posted
Regards,
Tony
#16
The Scammer Hammer
iTrader: (49)
in out of the box trim (without my hand finishing), its better than a "Mamofied" AFR 215 and I have made big power on numerous builds with that head (my goal was to be just as good in out of the box trim so I'm very pleased). I'm expecting the new 220's to perform very well.....keep you guys posted Regards, Tony
#17
Launching!
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Cape Girardeau Missouri
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tony, if you need a stock bottom end 5.3 n2o car to ginnie pig let me know! im starting with stock 799 heads so i could swap them and give results/track times NA and on spray.
BTW, Tony is the man, he did a great job on probably the most botched set of AFR225's he has ever seen!
BTW, Tony is the man, he did a great job on probably the most botched set of AFR225's he has ever seen!
#19
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,835 Likes
on
1,145 Posts
First post, second pic shows 862 casting