Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

MMS 220 Build for "Ghost Hawk"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-27-2015, 07:38 PM
  #221  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (14)
 
redbird555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pompano Beach FL
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

whats tony's lightened rps weigh? iirc it was around 30lbs
Old 08-27-2015, 07:51 PM
  #222  
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Darth_V8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,836 Likes on 1,145 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by redbird555
whats tony's lightened rps weigh? iirc it was around 30lbs
33 I think. It's a great looking clutch.
Old 08-27-2015, 07:59 PM
  #223  
TECH Resident
 
NemesisC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The twin billet carbon is 26lbs, the twin carbon street is ~36lbs I think. I think Tony had the street, not sure.....
Old 08-27-2015, 09:56 PM
  #224  
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Darth_V8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,836 Likes on 1,145 Posts
Default

Yep. And he carves some weight out
Old 08-27-2015, 10:02 PM
  #225  
TECH Enthusiast
 
5_litre_eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Darth_V8r
no I checked two valves on two different cylinders. The wipe pattern isn't about pushrod length, but pedestal height. Once I saw two cylinders give the same result I went with it. I will be measuring all 16 pushrods. FWIW, it was a subtle difference between.100" shims and .120". The .060" that came with the kit were way off.

Lol on the time comment. My wife went on a training thing for work, so I'm blasting through this as much as possible. Hoping when she gets home it's nothing left but bolt on stuff. Otherwise it'd be dragged out like my other projects.

She is awesome about letting me do this stuff but if the time gets too far out of balance she will lose patience.
This might be a dumb question, but how did you check the wipe pattern with no pushrods? Did you use your adjustable pushrods? If so, how did you know what length to make them?

Might be a dumb question, but I'm planning on doing about the same exact thing in a few weeks (only through a power robbing A4) and I have never measured for pushrods or installed roller rockers. It seems insane for a noob like myself to install such a high end set up, but then again it seems crazy to buy things twice and waste money....
Old 08-27-2015, 11:01 PM
  #226  
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Darth_V8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,836 Likes on 1,145 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 5_litre_eater
This might be a dumb question, but how did you check the wipe pattern with no pushrods? Did you use your adjustable pushrods? If so, how did you know what length to make them? Might be a dumb question, but I'm planning on doing about the same exact thing in a few weeks (only through a power robbing A4) and I have never measured for pushrods or installed roller rockers. It seems insane for a noob like myself to install such a high end set up, but then again it seems crazy to buy things twice and waste money....
Not a dumb question at all. I used the adjustables. I set them at about .050 lash. You need to be able to lift the rocker off the stem. That last 050 lift doesn't make too much difference when you compare various wipe patterns. You'll see how a pattern gets narrow and centered and how it compares to wider off center ones.

I spent three hours on the phone with Tony the night I did them. That was the one time during the whole build I think he would have punched me. But once you get it, it's pretty straight forward, and you feel sort of silly for not getting it
before.

And it's cheaper to just go all in. I wasted several thousand doing it on the cheap. If I had that money back I'd have my dual exhaust and be halfway to the lighter clutch
Old 08-28-2015, 04:39 AM
  #227  
LS1Tech Sponsor
 
Tony @ Mamo Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 763
Received 383 Likes on 150 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by redbird555
whats tony's lightened rps weigh? iirc it was around 30lbs
Guys,

Been buried....still digging out!

The Mamofied BC2 with the CNC machined windows around the perimeter of the flywheel (where that weight savings has the most advantage) knocks about 5 lbs off it.....come in around 32-32.5 lbs total.....flywheel and complete clutch assembly.

Low/mid 30's is the sweet spot for a performance street strip clutch.....you can go too light and the car is more of a hassle to drive. With this clutch it takes a day or three to get used to it and after that your just left with an engine that feels more alive, much more responsive, but minimal issues in normal driving. Tons of other perks concerning how well you can speed shift the car etc,, the fact its much easier on your synchros, and the extra ponies at the tire is also bonus.

Its the holy grail of performance dual purpose clutches IMO.....and I've driven just about everything....without fail most others come with some lingering annoyances that grow more painful the longer you live with them! (sound familiar guys....LOL.....it was right there!)

=)

Pics of the clutch

Name:  RPSBC2.jpg
Views: 566
Size:  82.6 KB

Name:  RPSBC2Assembly-1.jpg
Views: 568
Size:  50.9 KB
__________________


www.mamomotorsports.com

Tony@MamoMotorsports.com

Anything worth doing is worth doing well. Build it right the first time....its alot cheaper than building it twice!!
Old 08-28-2015, 06:33 AM
  #228  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (14)
 
redbird555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pompano Beach FL
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tony Mamo
Guys,

Been buried....still digging out!

The Mamofied BC2 with the CNC machined windows around the perimeter of the flywheel (where that weight savings has the most advantage) knocks about 5 lbs off it.....come in around 32-32.5 lbs total.....flywheel and complete clutch assembly.

Low/mid 30's is the sweet spot for a performance street strip clutch.....you can go too light and the car is more of a hassle to drive. With this clutch it takes a day or three to get used to it and after that your just left with an engine that feels more alive, much more responsive, but minimal issues in normal driving. Tons of other perks concerning how well you can speed shift the car etc,, the fact its much easier on your synchros, and the extra ponies at the tire is also bonus.

Its the holy grail of performance dual purpose clutches IMO.....and I've driven just about everything....without fail most others come with some lingering annoyances that grow more painful the longer you live with them! (sound familiar guys....LOL.....it was right there!)

=)

Pics of the clutch



Looks like a nice piece tony, my RST/Fidanza combo is 33lbs total and drives really nice. I have been contemplating on trying something in the 23lb range but I'm a little freaked out about it hence why I was asking the rps weight.

Most people who hate a light clutch (within reason) have never even driven one and are just repeating what they hear. I would love to try the rps billet with the alum option at 25lbs or the spec D-trim which is 23lbs. If you can get used to driving them the performance bonus from one is huge
Old 08-28-2015, 08:16 AM
  #229  
TECH Enthusiast
 
5_litre_eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Darth_V8r
Not a dumb question at all. I used the adjustables. I set them at about .050 lash. You need to be able to lift the rocker off the stem. That last 050 lift doesn't make too much difference when you compare various wipe patterns. You'll see how a pattern gets narrow and centered and how it compares to wider off center ones.

I spent three hours on the phone with Tony the night I did them. That was the one time during the whole build I think he would have punched me. But once you get it, it's pretty straight forward, and you feel sort of silly for not getting it
before.

And it's cheaper to just go all in. I wasted several thousand doing it on the cheap. If I had that money back I'd have my dual exhaust and be halfway to the lighter clutch
That makes sense - Thanks for the info!

It helps a lot reading through your build before I place my order and start tearing the motor apart. I think when I start, I will just order .120-.125 shims and see how close I get, and adjust from there.
Old 08-28-2015, 08:48 AM
  #230  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
North*power's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Boston Ma
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tony Mamo
Guys,

Been buried....still digging out!

The Mamofied BC2 with the CNC machined windows around the perimeter of the flywheel (where that weight savings has the most advantage) knocks about 5 lbs off it.....come in around 32-32.5 lbs total.....flywheel and complete clutch assembly.

Low/mid 30's is the sweet spot for a performance street strip clutch.....you can go too light and the car is more of a hassle to drive. With this clutch it takes a day or three to get used to it and after that your just left with an engine that feels more alive, much more responsive, but minimal issues in normal driving. Tons of other perks concerning how well you can speed shift the car etc,, the fact its much easier on your synchros, and the extra ponies at the tire is also bonus.

Its the holy grail of performance dual purpose clutches IMO.....and I've driven just about everything....without fail most others come with some lingering annoyances that grow more painful the longer you live with them! (sound familiar guys....LOL.....it was right there!)

=)

Pics of the clutch



Tony,
Pretty much verbatim of what we were speaking of just a day ago! Like you were saying to me, since it's not an organic based clutch it doesn't create any dust at all and will pretty much last the life of the vehicle. The craftsmanship on all the Billet parts look incredible, too nice to hide in the bellhousing if you ask me! Not to mention the weight savings (in the right places) and the lack of need to balance the whole assembly to minimize vibration.
The price is steep for many I'd say but the quality, performance gains, trouble free longevity, and piece of mind go a long way. Once my current setup needs to be replaced I'll be going for it.
Old 08-28-2015, 09:52 AM
  #231  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
conan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Back in the Burg
Posts: 6,492
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Darth_V8r
Not yet. I'm tapped out. The money I spent on all the other crap that happened would have covered the kooks and the clutch. Oh well. I basically ran dumped headers with 18" extensions on the end just to get a number. I don't expect the kooks will add, just sound better.

I do think the lighter clutch will make a difference.
I hear you on the money... No one should ever say going fast is cheap. Good luck with the next round of mods and enjoy the new power you added
Old 08-28-2015, 09:57 AM
  #232  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
scotty2000ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 2,090
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Anyone have any experience with too light of a clutch? How is the driving experience? What's difficult about it?
Old 08-28-2015, 12:27 PM
  #233  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (66)
 
blk00ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Jasper, AL
Posts: 2,366
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Yeah anyone have experience launching on one of these lightweight clutches?
Old 08-28-2015, 01:11 PM
  #234  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
svede1212's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by scotty2000ss
Anyone have any experience with too light of a clutch? How is the driving experience? What's difficult about it?
I don't have a lightweight fly but use a McLeod twin. The advantage of a twin is the clutch assembly itself is a smaller diameter and that moves the MOI closer to the axis helping to free up a few HP. The weight of the fly IMHO should be tied to intended use AND the weight of the car. My GTO is a little heavier and ones I've driven with a lightweight fly didn't behave as well in a street environment. They bog down a little without revs and slipping the clutch. A Vette might be fine. Just my humble opinion.
Old 08-28-2015, 03:45 PM
  #235  
TECH Fanatic
 
NAVYBLUE210's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Coast of San Mateo County Between Pacifica & HMB
Posts: 1,815
Received 215 Likes on 128 Posts

Default

Lighter Cluctch & Flywheels biggest benefit is in gear coming of a corner,
and recovery after shifting to next higher gear. On the street the criteria
in order to benefit is 1 lighter total vehicle weight, 2 higher numerical
Gears, 3 more displacement/stroke/low end torque, 4 more vacuum/
Less Cam Overlap, also where one drives there vehicle matters
As well, San Francisco Hills LOL! And stop & go commute traffic
Would certainly add to the Fun, NOT!
So in summation a weekend toy Vette with 3.42:1s, F body with
At least 3.73:1s, GTO with at least 4.10:1s with a high comp (11.0:1+) high velocity air speed Cylinder heads with medium sized cam relative to displacement With Wider LSA 113-116* is a baseline for a light
Clutch/Flywheel combo IMHO.

I do have Tony's RPS Billet Carbon Lightened Twin for my 396"
Vette Project in interest of full disclosure.
Old 08-28-2015, 04:02 PM
  #236  
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Darth_V8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,836 Likes on 1,145 Posts
Default

To be honest, I prefer larger overlap - at least so far. I've driven or run in mine - stock (-34), zero, +2, and now +7.5. Each has to me felt better on the butt dyno. I find that more overlap on the cam helps carry power better on the high end, though it makes low throttle / low rpm cruising more difficult. Also, it allows you to run earlier IVC for good midrange torque without sacrificing as much duration.

Look at the Tick SNS V2 that nobody ever complains about.

Having said that, if I do anything else to the internals of this motor, it'll be a bigger cam, like 235/240, but I'd still try to keep overlap in it. I want the duration, but I don't want the IVC to get too late on the compression stroke and start dropping midrange. But that's just talk. Exhaust is next no matter what. I hate this cobbled together exhaust I have now. It was much more fun that one drive I made with open headers.

The added benefit of nods of approval from guys with mullets. and quiet riot T shirts.
Old 08-28-2015, 05:44 PM
  #237  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
svede1212's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

With longer duration it's hard to avoid overlap so that shouldn't be a problem. If Tony specs the cam I think he is for me it should will be near 11.5*. One way to figure overlap is add the two durations together, divide by 4, subtract the lsa and then double that answer. As you can see by doing that larger durations increase overlap if the lsa remains the same. With a 235/240 you'd need a 118.75* lsa to get 0* overlap.
Old 08-28-2015, 07:41 PM
  #238  
LS1Tech Sponsor
 
Tony @ Mamo Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 763
Received 383 Likes on 150 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Darth_V8r

The added benefit of nods of approval from guys with mullets. and quiet riot T shirts.

__________________


www.mamomotorsports.com

Tony@MamoMotorsports.com

Anything worth doing is worth doing well. Build it right the first time....its alot cheaper than building it twice!!
Old 08-28-2015, 08:32 PM
  #239  
TECH Regular
 
tadams72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: SoCal
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default MMS 220 Build for "Ghost Hawk"

Originally Posted by Tony Mamo
I think I see the mullet growing as I read that!
Old 08-28-2015, 10:48 PM
  #240  
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Darth_V8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,836 Likes on 1,145 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tadams72
I think I see the mullet growing as I read that!
I would pay to see a picture of Tony in a mullet, denim vest, torn off sleeved night ranger shirt in front of a 1982 firebird with the chicken on the hood


Quick Reply: MMS 220 Build for "Ghost Hawk"



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:49 PM.