Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

MMS 220 Build for "Ghost Hawk"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-18-2017, 07:24 PM
  #561  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
98_WS6_M6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 1,296
Received 98 Likes on 76 Posts

Default

Awesome job Jake! Great for first time out. You had to have adrenaline pumping like crazy! Been long anticipated for sure man. What a great build. So much you can tweak for the track. You just have to figure out what you want to do. A shorter tire would definitely help and be an easy fix. I think you're running a 28" so 26" would be fun if you wanted to tweak something. I'd just run it the way it is a few times at the track and have fun. Congrats buddy!
Old 03-18-2017, 08:05 PM
  #562  
TECH Resident
 
jhshnh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

What's the weight of the car?
With a 2.1 60' running low 11s this tells me your easily in the 10s, especially trapping 125. I run 11.90s at 110 with a 1.58 60ft, so your definitely 10s.

I have et streets, and they have a sweet spot on tire pressure and burnout. Just 2-3 psi or not a proper burnout can make or break the run. Mine seems to hook better with a good burnout vs the light hazing everyone talks about with drag radials.
Old 03-18-2017, 08:16 PM
  #563  
TECH Resident
 
jhshnh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Also, what rpm where you shifting?
Old 03-18-2017, 10:09 PM
  #564  
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Darth_V8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,835 Likes on 1,145 Posts
Default

I shift at 7300. I use a raptor light. It's funny but I didn't do it for the track. I did it because my tach stops at 6400 for some weird reason. Came in handy though! I have the limiter set to 7500

The car is light. Not crazy light, but between tubular K and the drag pack I know it's down a bit from stock. I pulled the spare out but I left it full interior.
Old 03-19-2017, 12:57 AM
  #565  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,927
Received 412 Likes on 330 Posts

Default

Lol....my tach stops between 6400 and 6600. Phils old trans am did to.

Good job Darth! Not many can say their h/c ls1 went low 11s first time out!

It will go much quicker to. Can't wait to see how that develops!
Old 03-19-2017, 01:08 PM
  #566  
11 Second Club
 
SoFla01SSLookinstok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,541
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Unless I'm the only one spotting this.. I guess it's the 60'-330' time.

How can this car cover that distance in the same time as a nitrous, six speed, car that has a 1.4 60' & traps almost 137mph?

Maybe it's just how the track timing is setup?
Old 03-19-2017, 01:38 PM
  #567  
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Darth_V8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,835 Likes on 1,145 Posts
Default

I really don't have much frame of reference for you other than this. Per Tony, it's 600 at the crank. Even so, Lacking nitrous, I simply don't have the torque on the upshift in the higher gears - especially going into 4th. I never got to peak power in fourth. But with the lighter clutch and alternator only, it revs in 2,3 almost like it isn't loaded. IMO, the back half is clearly showing where it's being limited.

But let's play the what-if game... what if I knew how to launch and cut a 1.6-1.8 60', got over 100 at the 1/8, and then backhalfed a little better just by being deeper into fourth?

Better gear, better tire, better driver, and low 130's might be realistic. But I'd expect the nitrous car to pull me up top in fourth all day long.

And that's based on VERY limited experience, so if I'm wrong I'm wrong
Old 03-19-2017, 02:50 PM
  #568  
TECH Fanatic
 
NAVYBLUE210's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Coast of San Mateo County Between Pacifica & HMB
Posts: 1,815
Received 215 Likes on 128 Posts

Default

Not to mention +3600' DA!
26" Tires, some practice, & <+600' DA, High 10s @ 128+ as it sits!
Great Job Darth!

Curious if you know amount of vacuum @ idle?
Old 03-19-2017, 04:24 PM
  #569  
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Darth_V8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,835 Likes on 1,145 Posts
Default

I don't, but someone could do the unit conversion. I idle at 65-70 kpa, so that's 30 kpa under atmospheric
Old 03-19-2017, 04:37 PM
  #570  
11 Second Club
 
SoFla01SSLookinstok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,541
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Darth_V8r
I really don't have much frame of reference for you other than this. Per Tony, it's 600 at the crank. Even so, Lacking nitrous, I simply don't have the torque on the upshift in the higher gears - especially going into 4th. I never got to peak power in fourth. But with the lighter clutch and alternator only, it revs in 2,3 almost like it isn't loaded. IMO, the back half is clearly showing where it's being limited.

But let's play the what-if game... what if I knew how to launch and cut a 1.6-1.8 60', got over 100 at the 1/8, and then backhalfed a little better just by being deeper into fourth?

Better gear, better tire, better driver, and low 130's might be realistic. But I'd expect the nitrous car to pull me up top in fourth all day long.

And that's based on VERY limited experience, so if I'm wrong I'm wrong
Not saying your car isn't fast. As stated the car definitely has more potential. The back half is still strong knowing what's going on. When you get it in the right spot it will be faster.

The main thing was seeing a 2.1 60' with a low 11 et at 125 mph. It doesn't seem right. Then just looking at the slip & times. Your 60'-330 time matched a car w/ 1.4 60', 6.5 1/8 @ 107, & 10.0 1/4 @ 137. I don't see any way your car could match that time with that car. Or another car with a 2.3 60', 8.3 1/8 @ 104, & 12.1 1/4 @ 132. This car has about the same 60'-330' but look at the et & mph? It's a turbo car with a lot more hp.

I'm not trying to be rude. In reality If I saw a car run an 11.2 with a 2.1 60' I would say the mph would have to be higher than 99 1/8 & 125 1/4.

Can anyone find a vehicle that runs a 11.2et @125mph on a 2.1 60'?
Old 03-19-2017, 04:40 PM
  #571  
10 Second Club
 
big hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: over dere
Posts: 3,428
Received 152 Likes on 104 Posts

Default

What you're seeing is his oddball gearing. Right now 4th might as well be an overdrive so when he hits that gear it bogs out
Old 03-19-2017, 05:14 PM
  #572  
11 Second Club
 
SoFla01SSLookinstok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,541
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

No, no. I get the gearing & what's happening on the top end. Everything seems right after the 330' with the time/mph/et stuff. It's the 60'-330' time that seems to be off. Think of his slip 2.1 60' with a 7.0 1/8 mile. Now just look at that nitrous cars time 60' 1.4 to 6.5 1/8 mile. Darths car makes that jump in 4.9 seconds, nitrous car 5.1 seconds. Sorry but that cant be right. Like I said the slip seems good except for that 60'-330' time. That's where it seems off.
Old 03-19-2017, 05:31 PM
  #573  
11 Second Club
 
SoFla01SSLookinstok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,541
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

All in all I'd guess it's around .5 seconds off. Looking at a few other N/A six speed, low eleven second, 126-127mph cars.
Old 03-19-2017, 06:50 PM
  #574  
TECH Resident
 
jhshnh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

My car has 321 rwhp and cuts 1.58 60 ft and gets to the 330 in 4.779 seconds and runs 7.55 in the 1/8th.
I think what you're seeing is extreme spinning and then when he hooks, he's rolling. He posted a short video of the tach while he got in it on the street, and that llsr revs extremely fast.
His car is a different animal from the HR cams we're used to.
If he can cut a 1.5x 60ft he's mid 10s all day long.
Old 03-19-2017, 07:03 PM
  #575  
11 Second Club
 
SoFla01SSLookinstok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,541
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Your car moves out.

Your car 3.2 sec. 60'-330'. His car 2.6 sec.
Old 03-19-2017, 07:09 PM
  #576  
TECH Resident
 
jhshnh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Thanks. That's with a stock engine... even ls1 intake. After the 330 everybody starts walking me down, but I'm planning on taking care of that with h/c/i very soon.
Old 03-19-2017, 07:19 PM
  #577  
11 Second Club
 
SoFla01SSLookinstok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,541
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Nice!

I'm pretty sure this is a 416 car.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/11-second...eet-tires.html
Old 03-19-2017, 07:34 PM
  #578  
TECH Resident
 
jhshnh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

That is interesting, his 60 ft killed him too. The car he ran looks really efficient, especially from start to the 330.

My car is an A4 with 4k stall, so I guess what we're seeing in both cases is spinning with the M6 past the 60ft? That's about the only way I know to explain it, or once the car hooked it was completely out of the power band?
Old 03-19-2017, 08:35 PM
  #579  
TECH Veteran
 
Tuskyz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,742
Received 536 Likes on 383 Posts
Default

Can't beat a stiff wall slick with a M6 car. What torque arm is you running?
Old 03-19-2017, 08:44 PM
  #580  
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Darth_V8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,835 Likes on 1,145 Posts
Default

Short torque arm. Tunnel mount


Quick Reply: MMS 220 Build for "Ghost Hawk"



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:22 AM.