Why do LT motors like a lot of overlap and LS do not?
#1
Why do LT motors like a lot of overlap and LS do not?
I noticed a lot of people doing 228/236ish cams with 112-116 lsa in LS engines and most LT builds with a similar duration go with 107-110, why is that? The cam for my LT is a 230/240 on a 107.5, which caused my brothers jaw to drop since his is a streetsweeper HT 228/232 on a 111 in his LS. Mine has 20 degrees of overlap and his has 8 degrees. Is it head design with the cathedral ports? My cam was specced for a 383 with 11.5:1 and dart 180cc heads for fuel economy and midrange power, I am putting it in a 350 with heavily ported stock castings with 2.02/1.6 valves.
#2
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
I'm pretty sure it's the head design. The Cathedral port was a vast improvement over the LT heads. The less overlap needed is a byproduct of the better flowing heads. Just a guess though. A fuel economy head for the LS1 is the AFR 205 which is the smallest port available.
Trending Topics
#9
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
The short runner intake liked overlap to pull more cylinder filling charge. The long runner column of the LS continues to fill with less HELP from the high velocity exhaust side. Which is what oberlap really is
Also since the cathedral design is so much better (ex/in ratio) it can make great power with less duration (224) while still trapping a lot of cylinder pressure (TQ) and then a wide lobe separation can smooth out the manners;maintain fuel efficiency AND carry further up the rpm scale due to the delayed exhaust event. In a world of compromises; the LS architecture is such a win/win !!!!!
Also since the cathedral design is so much better (ex/in ratio) it can make great power with less duration (224) while still trapping a lot of cylinder pressure (TQ) and then a wide lobe separation can smooth out the manners;maintain fuel efficiency AND carry further up the rpm scale due to the delayed exhaust event. In a world of compromises; the LS architecture is such a win/win !!!!!
#11
Probly a stupid question but... Is overlap the biggest cause of surge? I've been reading a lot on what cam to go with and I see a lot of the same lobe configurations but with different overlap and it seems the less overlap the more "streetable" it is.
#13
When considering the stock cams, or emissions legal ones, in the aspect of more overlap, not necessarily performance related, is emissions output. A bunch of raw fuel igniting in the exhaust doesn't play well with the smog checker.
#14
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,835 Likes
on
1,145 Posts
My understanding is that it isn't "like" so much as "need".
Like others have said, the cathedral head flows very well and has very good port velocity, so you don't need as much cam to make power. I sort of think of a stock LS as a "heads-only" chevy small block.
Then, you have the lS3-style rectangle ports, which flow even better, requiring even less cam.
Like gtfoxy said, if you can generate the torque with less cam, then emissions will naturally drop.
Like JakeFusion said, the cathedrals will take high overlap cams quite well. They just aren't as necessary in general compared to the SBC/LT1 heads
Like others have said, the cathedral head flows very well and has very good port velocity, so you don't need as much cam to make power. I sort of think of a stock LS as a "heads-only" chevy small block.
Then, you have the lS3-style rectangle ports, which flow even better, requiring even less cam.
Like gtfoxy said, if you can generate the torque with less cam, then emissions will naturally drop.
Like JakeFusion said, the cathedrals will take high overlap cams quite well. They just aren't as necessary in general compared to the SBC/LT1 heads
#15
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
i.e. I had a 10.5* overlap cam that wasn't huge but still pretty good sized. After playing with the tune could drive 1,200 rpm in 6th with no surging.