Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LS6 Stroker??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-25-2004, 07:42 AM
  #1  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Question LS6 Stroker??

What would be the benefits of a 383 LS6 block stroker VS LS1 stroker?
Target would be 500rwhp N/A and 150 shot nitrous.

Any feedback would be great.
Old 08-25-2004, 08:30 AM
  #2  
Launching!
 
Blue Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Trois-Rivières (Québec / Canada)
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I don't think there is any advantage with the LS6 block. Actually, the LS1 block may be stronger and better suited for a high hp application.

The main advantage of stroking an LS6 engine over an LS1 is the heads. You will probably got around 20 more rwhp with ported LS6 heads over ported LS1's.
Old 08-25-2004, 08:56 AM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Next Year project: LS6 block or Ls1 (383)
I know LS6 have better oiling at crank journals and are a little less weight. Strength is irrelative till 700rwhp+ then LS1 is the choice.
Would the LS6 block be warranted for lubrication purpose. AFR heads and probably a R1 or G1 cam.
Old 08-25-2004, 03:22 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
cyphur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Texas
Posts: 8,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

why is the LS1 block stronger then the LS6 block? i'd think if you're only trying to go to 500 then stick with the LS6.
Old 08-25-2004, 03:46 PM
  #5  
12 Second Club
 
jermstyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

If you are building an engine from start to finish. Why not just go with the LS6 block for your base? There’s nothing wrong with the LS1 block, but the LS6 has better breathing and oiling characteristics. There was a local shop that built two engines exactly the same. One had a 2002 LS1 block and the other had a 2002 LS6 bock. Both used LS6 heads and were blue printed to a T. The LS6 engine made 12 more HP on the same engine dyno, same day same fuel same cam same everything.

I know two LS1’s could be 12hp apart, but it’s something to think about.
Old 08-25-2004, 04:48 PM
  #6  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (28)
 
TAQuickness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 3,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

It's all up to your budget. I came really close to buying an ls6 block for my stroker. I didn't see any real advantage to using the LS6 block, so I spent the money elsewhere.
Old 08-25-2004, 04:55 PM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

If you are building an engine from start to finish. Why not just go with the LS6 block for your base? There’s nothing wrong with the LS1 block, but the LS6 has better breathing and oiling characteristics
That is what i was thinking about.
Old 08-25-2004, 04:56 PM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

If you are building an engine from start to finish. Why not just go with the LS6 block for your base? There’s nothing wrong with the LS1 block, but the LS6 has better breathing and oiling characteristics
That is what i was thinking about.

Aluminum LS1/LS6 Bare Block, 3.900" Bore
Price: $1,295.00
Part # 12561166
This is the aluminum block used on the 2001 Z06 Corvette. It is an improved casting from earlier models. The casting number is 12561168. This block will accept all LS1 components. This block comes with a 3.900" bore and will accept upto a 4.000" stroke without any machining of the block.
The price is significant though.But for a top notch shortblock?..Hmmm

Last edited by PREDATOR-Z; 08-25-2004 at 05:04 PM.
Old 08-25-2004, 05:39 PM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
cyphur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Texas
Posts: 8,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

For $1200, you might as well just wait for the LS2 block. That should be become available this fall sometime(November maybe? hopefully.. ..) Then you'd have a great aluminum 6.0L. More horses baby, yea!!
Old 08-25-2004, 06:03 PM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by cyphur_traq
For $1200, you might as well just wait for the LS2 block. That should be become available this fall sometime(November maybe? hopefully.. ..) Then you'd have a great aluminum 6.0L. More horses baby, yea!!
Yeah, I can wait. As a matter of fact those are my two choices. The only benefit from LS6 so far is it is a direct bolt on, no fitting mods.
Old 08-25-2004, 06:18 PM
  #11  
TECH Junkie
 
Ben R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The LS6 block will be fine. The LS1 block is slightly stronger and better for re-sleeving purposes, but unless you're building a Max-Effort 383, the LS6 block will do just fine.
Old 08-26-2004, 03:43 AM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by KingCrapBox
The LS6 block will be fine. The LS1 block is slightly stronger and better for re-sleeving purposes, but unless you're building a Max-Effort 383, the LS6 block will do just fine.
I would be trying to hit 500>530rwhp N/A W/150 dry shot N2O. ~650
Old 08-26-2004, 10:14 AM
  #13  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (6)
 
TTtop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
I would be trying to hit 500>530rwhp N/A W/150 dry shot N2O. ~650
I just got my MTI built LS6/383 back from them yesterday after adding a Meziere EWP/LSX 90mm Intake/Fast 90mm TB to the engine.

The car was dynoed 2 weeks ago before these new mods, #'s were: 451rwhp/440rwtq.

Dyno #'s after new mods were: 479rwhp/469twtq.

If I switch to 1 7/8 headers from current 1 3/4 FLPs, do a X-pipe dumped exhaust from current I-pipe to cut-out, do lighter rims like Bogarts, and do some Harland Sharp roller rockers...I might sneak up on 500rwhp, but it would be close.

I could also have the heads milled some to raise compression up say a full point, that would gain too, but I would have to start running some race gas in every tank for daily driving...Randy
Old 08-26-2004, 11:14 AM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

How much did that whack you $$$ ??
I saw 5995 + exchange so let's say 1200 core $7200.0 ???
Old 08-26-2004, 11:49 AM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Bill's 02 Z-28 SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: silver Spring MD
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Hi Folks
My Point is GM has two blocks (LS1 & LS6) - they would not go to expense for the LS6 unless it was better. I have to think GM know how to do things and is in the business to make money. If the LS1 block could do the job, we would not see a LS6 block. One other point, I believe the Cam bearing holes are large than the LS1 (they both can use the same Cam bearing diameter) - it is the outside diameter of the bearing that is large for the LS6.
Just my two cents.
Bill
PS: Predator-Z, watch out for those camels on the road - for everybody, this is not a joke.
Old 08-26-2004, 11:53 AM
  #16  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (6)
 
TTtop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
How much did that whack you $$$ ??
I saw 5995 + exchange so let's say 1200 core $7200.0 ???

Yeah, that's about right..with the Moser 12-bolt included the total came in at just under $10k, not bad and I don't have to fill N2O bottles all the time!...Randy
Old 08-26-2004, 11:57 AM
  #17  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

PS: Predator-Z, watch out for those camels on the road - for everybody, this is not a joke.
LOL, I've been here since 96, that is only a side road problem. Main HWY is fenced on both sides, 3>4 lanes each, some of the best roads in the world IMO.

I think people crossing everywhere is more of a problem. Maybe we should fence them too. LOL
Old 08-27-2004, 03:39 PM
  #18  
TECH Apprentice
 
Boosted LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Nottingham, Notts, England, UK
Posts: 320
Received 5 Likes on 1 Post

Default

LS6 block has better breathing and should be stronger being sand cast instead of die cast. At the end of the day it probably doesn't matter all that much as both should be pretty strong



Quick Reply: LS6 Stroker??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:41 PM.