Turo

iTrader: (23)

specs of it are 232/236 .585/.598

yes i tried the search, but did not find much

how is the idle? is the clearance ok with stock heads? my main worry is that the car is a daily driver and for now, i only have 3.42 gears on an m6, and im assumming the cam will like 4.10 gears much better, should I be ok with 3.42 for the time being (while i save up enough $$$ for a new rearend), or will the surging be a little too much?

cyphur

iTrader: (10)

i'm gonna be running tsp's 231/237 595/598 112 on stock 3.42's for a while, i'm in the same boat as you(savin up for a rear-end). she shouldn't be too unmanagable, just gotta keep her a little higher in the rpm range. clearence should be fine with stock heads. idle will be pretty nice on a 112 if you get her tuned in well.

Turo

iTrader: (23)

the fm9 is actually on a 114 lsa, so im hoping the idle shouldn't be too bad with good tuning.

jrp

iTrader: (16)

Vince had one, said he hauled *** with it.

Grant B

How are the ramps on the FM cams? Good or bad for spring life? I need a no-maintence open track cam.

calongo_SS

iTrader: (7)

FM using cam motion lobes, which are very aggresive, more so than the comp xe-r lobes. Valve spring life will be a concern. Probably need to check them every 15k to 20k miles.

Turo

iTrader: (23)

yep, the cam is probably hell on valvesprings. im already planning on checking them every 10k miles, maybe replace them every 15k-20k depending on how they look.

01_SuperSlow

iTrader: (7)

fms cam motion lobes are softer (less agressive) than comp cams xe-r lobes

pdd

iTrader: (3)

i thought so too

cyphur

iTrader: (10)

Turo

iTrader: (23)

im sorry, you guys were correct, they are less aggressive than the xe-r

well, i am between this cam, and the FM13. both look good!

HartAttack

iTrader: (8)

Bringing this one back up.
Anyone use this cam?
I am planning on using it for my D1sc setup....any feed back ? Results?

Turo

iTrader: (23)

Shoot VINCE a pm, I know he ran it for a while.