Tsp 231/237 112lsa
10-27-2004, 04:36 PM
#1
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: omaha, NE
Posts: 1,004
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tsp 231/237 112lsa ok from what i understand this cam is really good for spray. but i'm also thinking of running a ati setup instead of the 150 shot. the lsa is too small for the blower right? if i retard the cam when i install it will that make it more blower friendly? now i know i should just go buy a cam that would work with it but this thing has been sitting in my office for about 6 months i want to use it bad. so what do you guys think? screw it and go with the juice, retard the cam for a blower setup?
10-27-2004, 05:35 PM
#2
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The other, other, other A-Town, NM
Posts: 795
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you have the money, I would by all means go with the blower. With the blower you can have all that power any time you want, whereas the spray has to be refilled often if you use it often.
10-28-2004, 03:27 AM
#5
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: omaha, NE
Posts: 1,004
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rons 00z
now i know i should just go buy a cam that would work with it but this thing has been sitting in my office for about 6 months i want to use it bad.
Trending Topics
10-28-2004, 12:45 PM
#8
TECH Resident
I asked my engine builder if retarding a cam would actually give me more power in a certain RPM range. He said that every time that he has tried to advance or retard a cam, he lost power on one end, and did not gain on the other.
It made sense to me. Maybe someone has experiemented with cam timing and dyno numbers???
It made sense to me. Maybe someone has experiemented with cam timing and dyno numbers???
10-28-2004, 01:01 PM
#9
On The Tree
iTrader: (-1)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You really neeed a cam with like a 114.5 or 115 LSA to bleed some of the presure off !
231/237 would be a good cam just dont know aobut the LSA and your cylinder presure!
231/237 would be a good cam just dont know aobut the LSA and your cylinder presure!
10-28-2004, 08:12 PM
#10
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: omaha, NE
Posts: 1,004
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by c54fun
You really neeed a cam with like a 114.5 or 115 LSA to bleed some of the presure off !
231/237 would be a good cam just dont know aobut the LSA and your cylinder presure!
231/237 would be a good cam just dont know aobut the LSA and your cylinder presure!
10-29-2004, 02:25 AM
#13
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: omaha, NE
Posts: 1,004
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 5POINT7
I thought reverse split cam's were best for FI setups? Larger intake duration that exhaust duration.
10-29-2004, 02:35 AM
#14
Restricted User
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 7,603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thought would say you will need more exhaust due to forcing the charge in on the lower intake.
I have that cam and its good DD and spray. If you like the rest of the cam but want to use it for FI, get one ground on 116*, my friends D1SC WS6 rocks. I know you already have the 112*, but a thought.
The 112* will not do good with the FI. Really, I would like to go with the 116* for spray as well.
I have that cam and its good DD and spray. If you like the rest of the cam but want to use it for FI, get one ground on 116*, my friends D1SC WS6 rocks. I know you already have the 112*, but a thought.
The 112* will not do good with the FI. Really, I would like to go with the 116* for spray as well.
