Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

NOT your everyday cam question (regarding BIG motor small cam)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-16-2005, 10:45 PM
  #1  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
dame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: berkeley ca
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default NOT your everyday cam question (regarding BIG motor small cam)

Cam guru's whats the equivilent of a 224/224-114 LSA in a stock cubed LS1 compared to a 408 stroker?? SERIOUS question
PLEASE no flames, Im asking this simply because 224/224-114 is the biggest I'VE SEEN pass smog here in Ca. and Im about to build this motor and i want it to pass the EMISSIONS part of the smog test (not worried about the visual)
Old 02-16-2005, 11:29 PM
  #2  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
pkincy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Scottsdale, Az
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Can't definitively answer that yet, but I put the TSP 233 torquer in my 402. My 224 TR on a 114 did smog in Kalifornia. I am now installing the 402 but will smog in Nv which is only an ALDL test.

If you like (it costs about 29$ here) I will happily have one of the stations put the sniffer in it after my ALDL test, if they will do so.

I would guess something in the mid 230's would be equivalent in that big a motor.

Perry
Old 02-17-2005, 10:20 AM
  #3  
Cal
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Cal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 4,692
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

When it comes to emissions, a 224 is a 224 in any engine.
Old 02-17-2005, 10:33 AM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
cyphur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Texas
Posts: 8,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Cal I would think more cubes would eat up more cam. a larger cam, if the VE's were similar to a 224 considering the ratio between the cam specs and the cubes of the motor, could achieve the same results. is this not the case?
Old 02-17-2005, 10:49 AM
  #5  
Cal
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Cal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 4,692
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by cyphur_traq
Cal I would think more cubes would eat up more cam. a larger cam, if the VE's were similar to a 224 considering the ratio between the cam specs and the cubes of the motor, could achieve the same results. is this not the case?
I think that is true when it comes to driveability, but not emissions. Big engines just have more torque period, so they don't lose as much streetability with a given cam size. But a cam with 230 degrees of intake duration still holds the bigger intake valve open for 230 degrees, while it's bigger piston travels down on it's longer intake stroke. And it will still have the same intake/exhuast overlap as the smaller engine, just blow even more raw fuel into the exhaust system with it's bigger pistons.
Old 02-17-2005, 12:41 PM
  #6  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
dame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: berkeley ca
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

where's a jrp when ya need one ..... LOL
Old 02-17-2005, 12:42 PM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
cyphur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Texas
Posts: 8,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cal
I think that is true when it comes to driveability, but not emissions. Big engines just have more torque period, so they don't lose as much streetability with a given cam size. But a cam with 230 degrees of intake duration still holds the bigger intake valve open for 230 degrees, while it's bigger piston travels down on it's longer intake stroke. And it will still have the same intake/exhuast overlap as the smaller engine, just blow even more raw fuel into the exhaust system with it's bigger pistons.
that makes sense, i didn't think of it that way. good point.

edit.....Cal did a pretty good job of explaining this one imho. jrp has lots of answers, but he'll be the first to admit he doesnt' have all of them.
Old 02-17-2005, 01:29 PM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
 
CHRISPY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

A larger motor WILL help a larger cam pass. The biggest difference is at idle. There will be less misfires (HC) from the larger displacement vs a smaller displacement engine with the same cam specs.

With good cats a larger (relatively) cam in a 402 should pass easily.
Old 02-17-2005, 01:41 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Juiced's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kalifornia
Posts: 1,138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

a larger motor will be able to use more of the cam and burn the fuel efficiently, thats why the new ZO6 will be able to run the cam and still pass smog because there is less raw fuel and hydrocarbons exiting the car.
Old 02-17-2005, 02:53 PM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
GuitsBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6,249
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

So how DOES a big cube motor react to a relatively small cam? Would a 224 perform like a stock ls1 cam? Would a f13 or torquer perform like a ls6 cam? Would a t-rex equal a 224? Will a 224 in a 408 still lope as much as a 224 in a 346, only at a steadier pace, meaning it wont lope erraticly? Also how would it affect the 408 if you threw in a 224 with 1.8 ratio rockers. That would put the lift around 600 without really increasing the duration? (technically not increasing the duration at all, only getting above the .050 mark earlier due to the added lift)
Old 02-17-2005, 03:24 PM
  #11  
Cal
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Cal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 4,692
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CHRISPY
A larger motor WILL help a larger cam pass. The biggest difference is at idle. There will be less misfires (HC) from the larger displacement vs a smaller displacement engine with the same cam specs.

With good cats a larger (relatively) cam in a 402 should pass easily.
Probably true if the larger motor is still using the same size heads (valves) as the smaller motor it is being compared with. Most bored/stroked LS1's are not going to have valves and ports proportionatly bigger to go with the new displacement.

No way is a T-Rex going to equal a 224 though!

Last edited by Cal; 02-17-2005 at 03:29 PM.
Old 02-17-2005, 04:09 PM
  #12  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
dame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: berkeley ca
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

In case some of you are a little confused..... I wanted to know how big of a cam could I go in a 408 (with afr 225's) that would be comparible to a tr224 on a 114 in a STOCK CUBIC INCH LS1 which is what i KNOW will pass cA. SMOG. This car WILL have 1 7/8 headers WITH CATS btw.
Old 02-17-2005, 04:23 PM
  #13  
jrp
SN95 Director
iTrader: (16)
 
jrp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Valencia, Ca
Posts: 10,755
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

keep the overlap in check 0 < and tune and you should be good.
Old 02-17-2005, 04:44 PM
  #14  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
11 Bravo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 3,078
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by GuitsBoy
So how DOES a big cube motor react to a relatively small cam? Would a 224 perform like a stock ls1 cam?
A guy here who I haven't seen in awhile put a TR224 in his 427. It made something like 450/450 and he said it idled smoother than stock.

Last edited by 11 Bravo; 02-17-2005 at 06:35 PM.
Old 02-17-2005, 05:10 PM
  #15  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
dame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: berkeley ca
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jrp
keep the overlap in check 0 < and tune and you should be good.

yeah but how big? of all the responses i thought i'd get a good one from you
Old 02-17-2005, 05:29 PM
  #16  
jrp
SN95 Director
iTrader: (16)
 
jrp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Valencia, Ca
Posts: 10,755
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

crunch some numbers

int duration + exh duration / 4 , - lsa, x2
Old 02-17-2005, 05:41 PM
  #17  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
dame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: berkeley ca
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jrp
crunch some numbers

int duration + exh duration / 4 , - lsa, x2
234+236/4, - 114 x 2 = 7

so.... is this good or no? LOL
Old 02-17-2005, 06:00 PM
  #18  
jrp
SN95 Director
iTrader: (16)
 
jrp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Valencia, Ca
Posts: 10,755
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

a tr224 114 has -4*, stock 98-00 cam has -36*. ls6 cam has ~-23*

my cam 16*
Old 02-17-2005, 11:03 PM
  #19  
TECH Resident
 
DavidNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

232/232 118/+4 = -4 also

So if a 224/224 114+4 can pass, can this pass? Which would be better? IVO and EVC is the same. Just IVC and EVO are 8 deg latter and earlier respectively.
Old 02-18-2005, 02:57 AM
  #20  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
dame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: berkeley ca
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DavidNJ
232/232 118/+4 = -4 also

So if a 224/224 114+4 can pass, can this pass? Which would be better? IVO and EVC is the same. Just IVC and EVO are 8 deg latter and earlier respectively.

118 lsa i would have to spin this thing to the moon wouldnt i????



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:09 AM.