5.3L vs LS6
#1
Launching!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Town near you
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
5.3L vs LS6
I noticed on another thread where a set of 5.3L heads outperformed anothers LS6 style heads.What is the better way to go on a full bolt-on 346 H/C setup?This was 2.02 valve vs 2.055.The LS6 style has more compression.I personally believe the 5.3L heads with a larger valve (2.04 or 2.055)would be better.
#2
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: St Clairsville, Oh
Posts: 1,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How did the ls6 heads have a Higher CR.
First who ported the ls6 heads and who did the 5.3.
IF you are running on stock cubes then i would stick with no bigger than a 2.02 intake vavle.
First who ported the ls6 heads and who did the 5.3.
IF you are running on stock cubes then i would stick with no bigger than a 2.02 intake vavle.
#3
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gardnerville, NV.
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by goober35
How did the ls6 heads have a Higher CR.
First who ported the ls6 heads and who did the 5.3.
IF you are running on stock cubes then i would stick with no bigger than a 2.02 intake vavle.
First who ported the ls6 heads and who did the 5.3.
IF you are running on stock cubes then i would stick with no bigger than a 2.02 intake vavle.
#5
TECH Addict
iTrader: (59)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vance, Alabama
Posts: 2,357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Its really hard to beat the 5.3 casting. They are cheaper, gives more compression and has been proven on many engines time and again. Just search the dyno section on this site and there are a bunch of good #s from 5.3 headed combos. Its my favorite head to work