Anyone running >.630 lift
#1
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Anyone running >.630 lift
I was wondering who was running .630 lift and greater. (1.7 rockers)
What set-up are you using for the rest of the valvetrain? What springs/longevity issues are you having? Have you been able to run the motor high in RPM without valvefloat issues?
What set-up are you using for the rest of the valvetrain? What springs/longevity issues are you having? Have you been able to run the motor high in RPM without valvefloat issues?
#3
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by cyphur_traq
don't you already have a post in this section concerning this?
sorry i don't have anything to add here, just curious about that.
sorry i don't have anything to add here, just curious about that.
#4
i replied in other post but.. .639 .646 hydraulic roller 408. Manley dual springs, crane lifters, comp pushrods, stock rockers.
Motor has not been run yet, i am still putting the car back together.
Motor has not been run yet, i am still putting the car back together.
#6
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
I'm running 630/640ish lift on my PRC Platinum spring kit & AFR 225s What you thinking about building?
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Trending Topics
#9
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by DAPSUPRSLO
I was running a .651 LSK Comp lobe in a 346. It wasted my comp r lifter though.
I see some use it and it is interesting that the applications are widespread. I am trying to maximize variables for my new 402 build-up.
Jason98TA I will be in touch for the heads.
For those of you that use this lift are you experiencing and issues with excessive spring wear? How high do you wind the motor? How often is it checked? I know that some of you are constantly into your motors but just curious as to what limits there are in some areas. With the springs I have the crane duals rated (BY THEM) for .650 lift. That is free torque for those that wish to deal with the spring issues.
#10
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by SiL3NtXWS6
i replied in other post but.. .639 .646 hydraulic roller 408. Manley dual springs, crane lifters, comp pushrods, stock rockers.
Motor has not been run yet, i am still putting the car back together.
Motor has not been run yet, i am still putting the car back together.
#11
Restricted User
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 7,603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I havent run mine yet still sitting in the shipping crate, cam is .6307/.6222 231/242 114*LSA 111*ICL. PP Gold Springs, Morel Hyd Lifters, TR Pushrods and Stock rockers, stuffed into a forged 347ci chunk of aluminum waiting to be fed some mild doses of nitrous. Cant wait.
I am going to guess depending how long the springs see the higher rpms, and the frequency of those visits will determine how long they will last. Like any other spring, if you keep it rev'd for long durations you'll lose longevity.
I am going to guess depending how long the springs see the higher rpms, and the frequency of those visits will determine how long they will last. Like any other spring, if you keep it rev'd for long durations you'll lose longevity.
#14
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Salisbury,MD
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Spinmonster
What is a LSK Comp lobe?
I see some use it and it is interesting that the applications are widespread. I am trying to maximize variables for my new 402 build-up.
Jason98TA I will be in touch for the heads.
For those of you that use this lift are you experiencing and issues with excessive spring wear? How high do you wind the motor? How often is it checked? I know that some of you are constantly into your motors but just curious as to what limits there are in some areas. With the springs I have the crane duals rated (BY THEM) for .650 lift. That is free torque for those that wish to deal with the spring issues.
I see some use it and it is interesting that the applications are widespread. I am trying to maximize variables for my new 402 build-up.
Jason98TA I will be in touch for the heads.
For those of you that use this lift are you experiencing and issues with excessive spring wear? How high do you wind the motor? How often is it checked? I know that some of you are constantly into your motors but just curious as to what limits there are in some areas. With the springs I have the crane duals rated (BY THEM) for .650 lift. That is free torque for those that wish to deal with the spring issues.
Lobe#, Dur. @ .006", .050", .200", & Lift w/1.7 rocker
2124 265 215 142 .629"
2125 269 219 145 .632"
2126 273 223 149 .636"
2127 277 227 153 .639"
2128 281 231 156 .643"
2129 285 235 160 .646"
2130 289 239 164 .649"
2131 293 243 168 .653"
2132 297 247 171 .656"
2133 301 251 175 .660"
2134 305 255 179 .663"
2135 309 259 183 .663"
2136 313 263 186 .663"
These are the LSK lobes. I believe they are in the new master catalogs. Very very agressive. The 239 at .050" LSK lobe is bigger then the 242 at .050" XE-R Lobe by the .200" number.
#15
TECH Resident
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Working in the shop 24/7
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by Spinmonster
I was wondering who was running .630 lift and greater. (1.7 rockers)
What set-up are you using for the rest of the valvetrain? What springs/longevity issues are you having? Have you been able to run the motor high in RPM without valvefloat issues?
What set-up are you using for the rest of the valvetrain? What springs/longevity issues are you having? Have you been able to run the motor high in RPM without valvefloat issues?
AFR 205 Heads
Titanium Super Seven Retainers
Gen-4 Dual Valve Springs
Hardened Push Rods
Stock Rockers
Works great!
Ed
#18
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by DAPSUPRSLO
Lobe#, Dur. @ .006", .050", .200", & Lift w/1.7 rocker
2124 265 215 142 .629"
2125 269 219 145 .632"
2126 273 223 149 .636"
2127 277 227 153 .639"
2128 281 231 156 .643"
2129 285 235 160 .646"
2130 289 239 164 .649"
2131 293 243 168 .653"
2132 297 247 171 .656"
2133 301 251 175 .660"
2134 305 255 179 .663"
2135 309 259 183 .663"
2136 313 263 186 .663"
These are the LSK lobes. I believe they are in the new master catalogs. Very very agressive. The 239 at .050" LSK lobe is bigger then the 242 at .050" XE-R Lobe by the .200" number.
2124 265 215 142 .629"
2125 269 219 145 .632"
2126 273 223 149 .636"
2127 277 227 153 .639"
2128 281 231 156 .643"
2129 285 235 160 .646"
2130 289 239 164 .649"
2131 293 243 168 .653"
2132 297 247 171 .656"
2133 301 251 175 .660"
2134 305 255 179 .663"
2135 309 259 183 .663"
2136 313 263 186 .663"
These are the LSK lobes. I believe they are in the new master catalogs. Very very agressive. The 239 at .050" LSK lobe is bigger then the 242 at .050" XE-R Lobe by the .200" number.
#20
TECH Resident
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Working in the shop 24/7
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by 1999TransamWs6
Was wondering if you guys would know is .600 lift too much for afr 205cc heads milled for a 11:1 CR with .041 gaskets? Will i have piston to valve problems?
Ed