Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

are 918's crap?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-30-2005, 05:18 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Lt1turboTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Jacksonville, Tx
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default are 918's crap?

Will Comp 918's float the valves with a .590 cam with boost behind it.
We have a problem car that will not make the boost it should. Been through the turbo system several times and no luck. Have been told several times that the 918's are no where near up the job for this application.
Opinions???
Old 05-30-2005, 05:27 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Tech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Comp 918s have been run on many much higher lift camshafts. How high are you spinning it?
Old 05-30-2005, 05:33 PM
  #3  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (59)
 
Bo White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vance, Alabama
Posts: 2,357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I usually keep the 918s for .595"/232 and less cams, anything more than that I use PRCs or Comp 921s. A boosted application would aggrevate the problem and would require more spring than a N/A application.
Old 05-30-2005, 05:56 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

It depends on the amount of boost.
5>6 psi should be max. Any more and I would go 921's.
But do you have a graph showing float??
Old 05-30-2005, 09:08 PM
  #5  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Lt1turboTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Jacksonville, Tx
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thats the issue, the graph doesnt really show float. The engine is a built 383 with a 228/232 .588/.590 on a 115. We are trying to run 12psi, but we cant get it above 8. We have tried 3 different turbos, 2 intercoolers, 2 wastegates, and 3 wastegate springs. Oddly enough, the most power we got was from a 60-1, not the t-76 or t-70. The 60-1 made 560/660 at 8psi. That is way out of turbo, but was just a temp while we got the t-70 which we are sticking with. Now, there may be a 200hp difference between back to back runs. The way I am thinking, NA the 918's are done. Now we try to run 12psi through and I'm just blowing boost through. I'd love to blame the springs, but I'm not sure yet.
Old 05-31-2005, 12:27 AM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

I'm no genius at FI but I'm a heavy juicer and I run XE-R lobes with 918's with no issues.
IMO you might want to look at ring blowby too.
Old 05-31-2005, 08:45 AM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Paul F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 1,894
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How are the springs setup? What kind of seat pressure are you running? This means much more then the kind of spring you are running.


.
Old 05-31-2005, 11:03 AM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Unaffiliated Racing
I will agree with Paul. Spring pressure is what is going to make the difference on a turbo motor. Due to back pressure from the turbo, the exhaust springs may not have enough pressure to keep the valve closed.
Hmm, that does make sense.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:29 AM.