In Limbo For Cam Choice
#1
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Junction City, Kansas
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In Limbo For Cam Choice
I currently have the comp xr269hr. I have LS1Edit tuning, descreened MAF, K & N FIPK kit, TB Bypass, Pacesetter Longtube headers, 3 "ORY, 80 series flowmaster, and 26918 comp springs with hardened pushrods.
I am looking at the TR224 112, FM 2, FM 4. I can't decide which one to get. I need a broad powerband for the street, but retain good times at the track. Will be putting in 3.73 gears from motive and a cutout in it soon. The goal is 390+ for rear wheel power and torgue. WHat do you all think?
I am looking at the TR224 112, FM 2, FM 4. I can't decide which one to get. I need a broad powerband for the street, but retain good times at the track. Will be putting in 3.73 gears from motive and a cutout in it soon. The goal is 390+ for rear wheel power and torgue. WHat do you all think?
#2
11 Second Club
You won't make 390 rwtq. What are the specs on your current cam, the xr269hr? What do you make with it?
You may or may not make 390 rwhp with a ~224 cam, but there is a decently good chance. I assume you have a manual transmission?
You may or may not make 390 rwhp with a ~224 cam, but there is a decently good chance. I assume you have a manual transmission?
#3
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Junction City, Kansas
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Current specs are 216/220, .529/.534, 114LSA. I put down 361.8 RWHP and 362.9 RWTQ. I want to keep a similiar powerband, but at least 15-20 RW power. I need more jolt in the powerband with a slightly more aggressive lope.
#7
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San jose, CA
Posts: 1,437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The 112 is more choppyer and it sounds sick. If you go with this came you will fall in love with it or if you give ALLEN or CANDY FUTRAL a call and they will help you pick that fit's your need's. But F13 rock's.
Trending Topics
#8
Launching!
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Saginaw, MI
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the cam you have can get you there look at thunder racing dyno sheet. Heads and muffler would get you there. Plus if you get the larger cam your in the new springs every 30k or so.
#9
Launching!
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Saginaw, MI
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh, I have that cam on the shelf getting ready to put it in. I also have a M6. what kind of times are you running? What else can you tell me about the cam. Drivablity and such. I'm going for a sleeper.
#10
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here's my idle clip of the F11 on a 112 LSA. Sounds VERY tame and drives like stock on the street.
http://www.lsuxblake.com/vids%20001.avi
http://www.lsuxblake.com/vids%20001.avi
#11
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Covington, LA
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd go with the F-13 or one of Futral's other grinds. I'm very happy with mine.
Here are some clips:
http://kraest.com/vette/stuntin.mpg
http://kraest.com/vette/idle.mpg
Here are some clips:
http://kraest.com/vette/stuntin.mpg
http://kraest.com/vette/idle.mpg
#12
11 Second Club
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1.8 Rockers
I have the XR269HR Cam 216 220 LSA 114 with 1.8 Yella Terra rockers. I have a 25% UDP and over radiator air intake. Its mafless tuned with a heap of timing. Using the LS1 intake and S3 type 75mm TB i have run 11.765/115mph at 3625lb. My converter is a Yank SS3600.
It would run under 11.50 if a little lighter with SS4000 and 4.11s.
Happy with it. Revs straight to a 7000rpm limiter.
Gets 25-28mpg on a trip and idles at <700rpm
It would run under 11.50 if a little lighter with SS4000 and 4.11s.
Happy with it. Revs straight to a 7000rpm limiter.
Gets 25-28mpg on a trip and idles at <700rpm
#15
Originally Posted by my01camaroz28
I currently have the comp xr269hr. I have LS1Edit tuning, descreened MAF, K & N FIPK kit, TB Bypass, Pacesetter Longtube headers, 3 "ORY, 80 series flowmaster, and 26918 comp springs with hardened pushrods.
I am looking at the TR224 112, FM 2, FM 4. I can't decide which one to get. I need a broad powerband for the street, but retain good times at the track. Will be putting in 3.73 gears from motive and a cutout in it soon. The goal is 390+ for rear wheel power and torgue. WHat do you all think?
I am looking at the TR224 112, FM 2, FM 4. I can't decide which one to get. I need a broad powerband for the street, but retain good times at the track. Will be putting in 3.73 gears from motive and a cutout in it soon. The goal is 390+ for rear wheel power and torgue. WHat do you all think?
Keep your cam and use NITROUS OXIDE. The NX MAF kit is the best.
#17
You will not get much more seat of the pants raw power with just a cam change. Bigger cubic inches and good heads work much better but are very expensive.
Nitrous feels like a big cubic inch motor ripping down the track. Its not fake.
Nitrous feels like a big cubic inch motor ripping down the track. Its not fake.
Last edited by gollum; 08-19-2005 at 09:15 PM.
#20
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Junction City, Kansas
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, no point in disputing it, but look at it this way. I am not getting NOS, but when the bottle runs out, the power runs out. With my way, the power maintains until the gas runs out.