Anyone sprayed there 233/239 cam?
07-22-2005, 02:05 PM
#1
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anyone sprayed there 233/239 cam? ok i just put this cam in and later on down the road im gonna get nitrous..is this a good or bad nitrous cam..does anyone know from experience? thanks!
07-23-2005, 05:17 PM
#3
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Amarillo Texas
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have this bad boy cam and have sprayed a 150 shot on it, and it feels awsome, pulls great on bottom end and top end. Im about to put the jets in for the 250 after i get the new exhaust on but damn you will be happy.
josh
josh
07-24-2005, 04:45 AM
#4
TECH Senior Member
Originally Posted by Y2kforgedSS
I have this bad boy cam and have sprayed a 150 shot on it, and it feels awsome, pulls great on bottom end and top end. Im about to put the jets in for the 250 after i get the new exhaust on but damn you will be happy.
josh
josh
07-24-2005, 12:17 PM
#5
10 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Are you guys running the old version of the 233/239 or the new 233/239 Revision II Camshaft? I've got the newer version on a 113ls with a 150 shot and a set of AFR 205's should be ordered next week. Just bought a Fast 90 intake so I'm hoping for 430+rwhp thru a 3500 stall and 10bolt.. I bet this thing is gonna run like a raped ape on the juice..
07-24-2005, 12:32 PM
#6
I have a buddy that is running this cam and he made 546hp on a 150. It pulls really hard.
1QuickT-A, I just did the fast 90/90 with the 233/239 r.2 and PRC 2.5's and it made a huge difference. I won't get back to the dyno until later this week so I can't give any real numbers but my previous best was a 12.31 1/4. At the drags on friday I was able to beat a car that runs 12.1's by a fair margin about 4 times. So I am thinking the Fast gave me about 25-30 rwhp at least. Previous dyno was 398rwhp.
1QuickT-A, I just did the fast 90/90 with the 233/239 r.2 and PRC 2.5's and it made a huge difference. I won't get back to the dyno until later this week so I can't give any real numbers but my previous best was a 12.31 1/4. At the drags on friday I was able to beat a car that runs 12.1's by a fair margin about 4 times. So I am thinking the Fast gave me about 25-30 rwhp at least. Previous dyno was 398rwhp.
07-24-2005, 08:10 PM
#7
10 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by formula305
1QuickT-A, I just did the fast 90/90 with the 233/239 r.2 and PRC 2.5's and it made a huge difference. I won't get back to the dyno until later this week so I can't give any real numbers but my previous best was a 12.31 1/4. At the drags on friday I was able to beat a car that runs 12.1's by a fair margin about 4 times. So I am thinking the Fast gave me about 25-30 rwhp at least. Previous dyno was 398rwhp.
Trending Topics
07-24-2005, 08:12 PM
#8
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: huntingtown ,MD
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1QuickT-A
So, you made 398rwhp with the PRC 2.5 heads and the 233/239 cam thru a 6spd and ran a best of a 12.3? Or were those numbers from a different setup? Cause those numbers sound really really low to me..
07-24-2005, 10:48 PM
#12
10 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by co.6z28
*EDIT* he has stock ls1 intake & throttle body...
Last edited by 1QuickT-A; 07-25-2005 at 09:15 PM.
07-25-2005, 08:55 PM
#14
Originally Posted by 1QuickT-A
lol, I'd be pissed if I had Stage 2.5 5.3 heads with a cam that size and didnt put down 400rwhp.. That setup should put down 430rwhp or somewhere close to that..
Thats why I'm sending my PRC heads back..
Thats why I'm sending my PRC heads back..
07-25-2005, 09:13 PM
#15
10 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok I didnt know you were running the factory Ls1 intake.. The stock MAF should not be a concern tho. With stage 2.5 5.3 heads, a cam that size, fast 90/90, and good driving skills you should be in the mid 11's with traction.. And 430+rwhp..
07-25-2005, 10:44 PM
#16
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North of Seattle
Posts: 2,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1QuickT-A
Ok I didnt know you were running the factory Ls1 intake.. The stock MAF should not be a concern tho. With stage 2.5 5.3 heads, a cam that size, fast 90/90, and good driving skills you should be in the mid 11's with traction.. And 430+rwhp..
Hell i picked up 17 rwhp by simply replacing the maf with 3.5" tubing and some minor tuning.
Nate
07-25-2005, 11:55 PM
#18
Originally Posted by 1QuickT-A
then why doesnt everyone do that???
I think mid elevens is definatly possible especially after I get the wideband 02 back in so I can readjust the air/fuel. The only thing that might stop it are the 3.42's.
07-25-2005, 11:58 PM
#19
10 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=formula305]Not everyone wants to run a speed density tune. And I would guess that not all the 17hp came from removing the restriction of the MAF, Im sure the tune was tweaked for performance. [QUOTE]
Exactly...
Yes, it should do mid 11's if everything is setup right.. Not sure if it will do it with the 3.42's or not tho. Cause if you run on slicks the 3.42's will be a problem..
Exactly...
Yes, it should do mid 11's if everything is setup right.. Not sure if it will do it with the 3.42's or not tho. Cause if you run on slicks the 3.42's will be a problem..
