Quick question....Futral 224 vs. Thunder 224......???
#3
14 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 2,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was also curious about this. Are these two cams different @ .004 and .006? I've always read that due to the FMS/Cammotion lobe design, that it reaches max lift quicker resulting in more under the curve torque. Is this right?
Trending Topics
#8
On The Tree
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 99ssleeper
U never raced me...so how can you say youre faster? I see no 12.22 timeslip for Zinc!!!! lol
ps. sell me your cam if youre gonna sell your car
ps. sell me your cam if youre gonna sell your car
Cam is selling w/ the car. Meebe if you didnt own me out of the old 224......
~the sig was kinda a joke~
#11
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
Originally Posted by 99silveradoSS
I was also curious about this. Are these two cams different @ .004 and .006? I've always read that due to the FMS/Cammotion lobe design, that it reaches max lift quicker resulting in more under the curve torque. Is this right?
#13
Originally Posted by Zinc
AH, I see you've forgot about our frum roll's when I had the stock cam
Cam is selling w/ the car. Meebe if you didnt own me out of the old 224......
~the sig was kinda a joke~
Cam is selling w/ the car. Meebe if you didnt own me out of the old 224......
~the sig was kinda a joke~
Sorry, TR224 was gone a long time ago.
#14
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
I have the TR224 .564 on a 114. I like it. I wanted a can that's better than stock, but not lobie. I could have went bigger, But I want the car to last 20 years. I just bought AFR heads at 61cc, and wonder how the SOTP will be when I add that.
Im sure it will be fun to drive.......well, even more fun to drive
Im sure it will be fun to drive.......well, even more fun to drive