Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Budget heads: PP Stage III LS6's or PP stage III 5.3's? Pros and Cons?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-15-2005, 01:15 AM
  #1  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
waterbug1999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,282
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Budget heads: PP Stage III LS6's or PP stage III 5.3's? Pros and Cons?

Kind of what the title says. I am tore between the 2. Besides the small $$ difference. What makes one better then the other. Or am I just "splitting Hairs" as JRP puts it.

Just want a weekend warrior and a fun drag car. Not my daily driver either.

Let me know.. thanks
Old 09-15-2005, 01:41 AM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
MUSTANGEATER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Belleville, IL
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I would probably go with the LS6 style heads.
Old 09-15-2005, 01:50 AM
  #3  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
waterbug1999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,282
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by MUSTANGEATER
I would probably go with the LS6 style heads.
Yea, you really cant beat the price. I think the quality of the PP heads have been stepped up as well.

Was thinking of the LS6 III's as they have slightly bigger valves and will net more flow. But, I would think that I would have to go with a smaller cam? correct?

Like your call sign.. I killed 3 at the track last time I went!!
Old 09-15-2005, 02:09 AM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

It will depend on the cam you'll run and your power range desired.
Old 09-15-2005, 02:13 AM
  #5  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
waterbug1999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,282
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
It will depend on the cam you'll run and your power range desired.

I would like to hit the 400 mark. since I have an A4 and a 4K stall I think that it will be kinda hard.
Old 09-15-2005, 02:54 AM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Get a cam that allows you to run 11.0>11.5:1 with a quench of .030>.035 without notching the pistons. Quench is relative to your piston to deck measurement and your gasket thickness
Quench = PTD - Compressed Gasket thickness.
you do not have to think too big to make 400. I'm at 429 with a 224/220 cam and PRC 2.5/ 5.3L and 11.0:1 static Compression
Old 09-15-2005, 03:02 AM
  #7  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
waterbug1999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,282
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
Get a cam that allows you to run 11.0>11.5:1 with a quench of .030>.035 without notching the pistons. Quench is relative to your piston to deck measurement and your gasket thickness
Quench = PTD - Compressed Gasket thickness.
you do not have to think too big to make 400. I'm at 429 with a 224/220 cam and PRC 2.5/ 5.3L and 11.0:1 static Compression
Yea, those are the things that I try to understand but just dont get. Thats why I am kind of asking what will work the best with what heads. I understand that the thinner the gasket the more compression, but that also gives you less height thus limiting the PTV clearance. Man I am dumb..
Old 09-15-2005, 04:21 AM
  #8  
ЯєŧąяĐ Єl¡m¡иąŧøя ™
iTrader: (18)
 
orangeapeel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Justin, TX
Posts: 16,083
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

depends on if you get them compression milled as well.
Old 09-15-2005, 04:25 AM
  #9  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
waterbug1999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,282
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Maybe Gunnar will chime in and tell me if they come milled or not. I dont think their website says if they do or dont.

I looked, and it said the LS6 are "Milled to OEM deck height". And the 5.3's did not say anything on their website.
Old 09-15-2005, 05:29 AM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

yeah, that is because the 59cc are welded chambers so they should be OEM, but valves are bigger so PTV changes.
This is why I said choose the heads, compression and gasket, then trow in a cam that fits without notching.
You'll make more power that way, than running bigger cam with less Compression and wider quench.
Old 09-15-2005, 05:43 AM
  #11  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
waterbug1999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,282
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
yeah, that is because the 59cc are welded chambers so they should be OEM, but valves are bigger so PTV changes.
This is why I said choose the heads, compression and gasket, then trow in a cam that fits without notching.
You'll make more power that way, than running bigger cam with less Compression and wider quench.
Thats what I am one here for.. To find out all this stuff.... So, if I do decide to get the 59cc Stage III LS6 heads. What gasket to get that will raise my compression? A .045 will be around 11.2?
Old 09-15-2005, 06:22 AM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

http://www.rbracing-rsr.com/compstaticcalc.html
average piston deck height is .007 out of hole, so negative figure is needed in the calc.

With 59cc chambers and .045, you are looking at 11.66
With a 62 cc 5.3 and .045, you are looking at 11.2
with 64cc 5.3 and .045, you are looking at 10.91
With 64 cc and .040, you are looking at 11.05
and with 62cc and .040 it is 11.34

that should give you an idea. Mind you these calcs are close ballpark, actual will differ a tiny bit.
Old 09-15-2005, 07:42 AM
  #13  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (58)
 
Z'mnypit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I wouldnt go with a stage 3 head, without bigger displacement. PP heads arent milled unless you want them milled. I just had a set of PP stage II LS6 heads with 2.02 intake valves, 1.60 exhaust valves, & 62cc combustion chambers, with the stock height gasket that they provide I had no PtoV clearence issues. The CR was right at 10.7-1 & best of all, the heads pulled like a raped ape, with the F13 cam.
Old 09-15-2005, 10:54 AM
  #14  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (20)
 
Gunnar@Patriot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Vann is right, our heads will be at factory height. The stage II head would better suit your needs. If we do a 59cc chamber with the GM MLS gaskets we send, you will have approx. 11-1 compression.
Old 09-15-2005, 11:27 AM
  #15  
JS
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
JS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Delray Beach, Fl.
Posts: 7,303
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Yes but the .54 gasket - the .007 = a quench of .047...Thats not the best quench,I'd look into a PP S2 62CC head with the Cometic .045 and run a quench od .038...
Old 09-15-2005, 05:42 PM
  #16  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
waterbug1999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,282
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Some sweet info guys.. Thanks. One last question:

The only difference between Stage II & III are just the valve size and CC options. So, why would I choose stage II (less flow) over the III (more flow). Is that a no brainer or am I missing something?
Old 09-15-2005, 10:14 PM
  #17  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
SporkLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: STL Metro Area
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Question.... have you thought about waiting for some of the aftermarket casts coming out this winter after SEMA and having those worked over?

DART has a 225 Runner head that flows 300 @ .500 .... http://www.dartheads.com/manager/uploads/LS1Flyer.pdf

Jegs has those listed as 640 per head assembled.... and I do believe that is slightly cheaper than LS6 heads
Old 09-15-2005, 11:07 PM
  #18  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
waterbug1999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,282
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by SporkLover
Question.... have you thought about waiting for some of the aftermarket casts coming out this winter after SEMA and having those worked over?

DART has a 225 Runner head that flows 300 @ .500 .... http://www.dartheads.com/manager/uploads/LS1Flyer.pdf

Jegs has those listed as 640 per head assembled.... and I do believe that is slightly cheaper than LS6 heads
Yea, I read about those. And I might just do that. But, like I have always heard, if its sounds to good to be true, then it probably is.. But, i guess we will see.
Old 09-15-2005, 11:29 PM
  #19  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
waterbug1999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,282
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

UPDATE... Well, I just called JEGS and ordered a pair of the 225CC Dart heads..

So, I guess I'll be one of the first to test them out straight out of the box. Only $1289 shipped to my door.
Old 09-15-2005, 11:49 PM
  #20  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
fotoboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

gunner told me that with stock bore you will run into shrouding issues with bigger valves resulting in less flow.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:58 AM.