Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

98 Model year LS1 vs. other years

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-19-2005, 12:09 AM
  #1  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
LS1Z28_98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default 98 Model year LS1 vs. other years

I read a lot on here that people don't do this or don't do that because they drive a 98. Is a 98 really as limited as I am beginning to think it is? I know the basic differences like the advent of the LS6 intake and all. I know that can be fixed, but I am just wondering if having a 98 is a disadvantage or not engine wise.

Any input?
Old 10-19-2005, 12:18 AM
  #2  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (24)
 
bshell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

People seem to have a harder time tuning with the 98 pcm. The knock sensors are also hypersensitive.
Old 10-19-2005, 12:29 AM
  #3  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
LS1Z28_98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I know the PCM is not replacable, but for the knock sensors for example, could a later year knock sensor work on a 98, or is that not the issue?
Old 10-19-2005, 04:58 AM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
CaptUSA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

There are subtle differences, but an LS1 is an LS1 for the most part. Intake manifold and exhaust manifold are the biggest differances. Different cam, diff PCM, AIR, some minor stuff.

'98 - '02 F-body = LS1.
Old 10-19-2005, 12:13 PM
  #5  
Launching!
 
bulletLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Guatemala City.
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation

since were in the "internals" section, here is my experience:

first and foremost is the timebomb of the con rod bolts, they are made of asparragus, and they strech over time, I broke a rod on a perfectly SATATIC car, mine broke a rod on startup, yes the starter broke the rod. CHANGE TO ARPs ASAP!!!!!
then the "window" for venting gases betwen cylinder bays, the earlier blocks have a drilled hole that goes thru all the bays (Pn 12550592) and the later-present blocks have a cast window (Pn 12561168) also this later blocks have a cast "pocket" in the rear of the pushrod gallery. (not to be concerned about, unless youre planing a max effort engine)

the earlier stamped Stainless steel ex manifolds obviously an expensive part where made because thet get up to temp very quickly, later manifolds where cast because the PCM had more computing capacity to compensate.

as you mention, the intake of later LSx was developed for the C5R and looked identical as the original (which rules forced to an OEM manifold) the tooling to make the new shape was easy to develop from the originals and cost was practically the same so all later lsx have this "upgraded" intake

pistons: newer pistons are made with a new alloy that make them more stable thru thermal expansion hence they fit tighter in new blocks, also because of the thigtiness they now have teflon pads to minimize scuffing.

and a miriad of other smalish things, none of them to worry about.

you should buy this two books that are very informative even if youre not mechanically inclined they let you enjoy this forum even more
goto ebay and find ls1 + books there easy to locate.

CHANGE THE ROD BOLTS ASAP!!!!!!!!!!

Last edited by bulletLS1; 10-19-2005 at 12:33 PM. Reason: INCOMPLETE
Old 10-19-2005, 12:49 PM
  #6  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (199)
 
11SECSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Hampton Va
Posts: 1,494
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I have a 98 motor for my 00 camaro and was tinking of just putting a LSX intake and some 01-02 knock sensors and keep on driving since the cam seems a little bit more on lift and cant see the difference in the heads (stock).
Old 10-19-2005, 03:11 PM
  #7  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Steve C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i just heard of some tuning differences/difficulties with the 98 LS1's thats it
Old 10-19-2005, 05:15 PM
  #8  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (24)
 
bshell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by LS1Z28_98
I know the PCM is not replacable, but for the knock sensors for example, could a later year knock sensor work on a 98, or is that not the issue?
Later year (late 99 on up) knock sensors will work just fine. You may need to get the upgraded wire harness to match though.
Old 10-19-2005, 05:20 PM
  #9  
Launching!
 
Kounsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ashland, Ky
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well i have a 98 hardtop ss, and just had a rod bearing just go out sat, it was supposed to have a rebuilt engine, but it was suppose to have alot of things done to it too like a clutch and it was totally gone, but i dont think the 98 holds up like the other ls1's but thats why im going to go bigger and better!!!!!!!!
Old 10-19-2005, 11:45 PM
  #10  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
LS1Z28_98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

first and foremost is the timebomb of the con rod bolts, they are made of asparragus, and they strech over time, I broke a rod on a perfectly SATATIC car, mine broke a rod on startup, yes the starter broke the rod. CHANGE TO ARPs ASAP!!!!!


What company is ARP?
Old 10-21-2005, 11:43 AM
  #11  
Launching!
 
bulletLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Guatemala City.
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

http://www.arp-bolts.com/ARP_2005Cat...p)work.id2.pdf
Old 10-21-2005, 01:58 PM
  #12  
On The Tree
 
T/A rocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Knoxville, TN.
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bulletLS1
since were in the "internals" section, here is my experience:

first and foremost is the timebomb of the con rod bolts, they are made of asparragus, and they strech over time, I broke a rod on a perfectly SATATIC car, mine broke a rod on startup, yes the starter broke the rod. CHANGE TO ARPs ASAP!!!!!
then the "window" for venting gases betwen cylinder bays, the earlier blocks have a drilled hole that goes thru all the bays (Pn 12550592) and the later-present blocks have a cast window (Pn 12561168) also this later blocks have a cast "pocket" in the rear of the pushrod gallery. (not to be concerned about, unless youre planing a max effort engine)

the earlier stamped Stainless steel ex manifolds obviously an expensive part where made because thet get up to temp very quickly, later manifolds where cast because the PCM had more computing capacity to compensate.

as you mention, the intake of later LSx was developed for the C5R and looked identical as the original (which rules forced to an OEM manifold) the tooling to make the new shape was easy to develop from the originals and cost was practically the same so all later lsx have this "upgraded" intake

pistons: newer pistons are made with a new alloy that make them more stable thru thermal expansion hence they fit tighter in new blocks, also because of the thigtiness they now have teflon pads to minimize scuffing.

and a miriad of other smalish things, none of them to worry about.

you should buy this two books that are very informative even if youre not mechanically inclined they let you enjoy this forum even more
goto ebay and find ls1 + books there easy to locate.

CHANGE THE ROD BOLTS ASAP!!!!!!!!!!
The post was asking for difference of '98 to the toher years. I believe all the LS1 years use the same con rod bolts. Though ARP's are infinately better, I have a '98 LS1 with heads/cam and over 80,000 miles with no issues, connecting rod bolts or otherwise. If you had one break starting the car up it either was damaged before that, or was a factory defect. Lots of modified LS1's are out there running strong, some even with forced induction, on the stock bottom end.
Old 10-21-2005, 02:54 PM
  #13  
Var
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Var's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

2001 and up LS1's should have the upgraded rod bolts.
Old 10-21-2005, 07:51 PM
  #14  
TECH Apprentice
 
bichin95redta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buffalo, N.Y.
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

"2001 and up LS1's should have the upgraded rod bolts."

Yup....'97-'00 were suspect

'01 & '02 received the re-designed, stronger rod bolts

'01 & '02 also got different cams:

'98-'00 F-Body .500/.500 209/198 119.5 LSA 117/122 timing

'01 & '02 F-Body .479/.467 207/196 116 LSA 117/115 timing

Also, GM recommends that '97-'98 LS1 blocks be honed to a maximum of .004, while '99 and later can be opened up to a max of .010.

Design of the block's rear oil passage was also improved after the '98 model year.
Old 10-21-2005, 09:01 PM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
8GTOKLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Socal
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Plain and simple its the 1st year of the model change. It was the first year of the Ls1 in fbody. Ask vette owners every new body change
Old 10-24-2005, 05:31 PM
  #16  
On The Tree
 
T/A rocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Knoxville, TN.
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I stand corrected on the rod bolts. Didn't know '01 and up had revised ones.
Oh well, I'll keep runnin the **** out of mine til she breaks. Then it'll just be upgrade time!
Old 10-24-2005, 06:41 PM
  #17  
Var
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Var's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by T/A rocker
I stand corrected on the rod bolts. Didn't know '01 and up had revised ones.
Oh well, I'll keep runnin the **** out of mine til she breaks. Then it'll just be upgrade time!

ummm how about rebuild time
Old 10-26-2005, 03:29 PM
  #18  
On The Tree
 
T/A rocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Knoxville, TN.
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Var
ummm how about rebuild time
What I meant is, if she blows, I will upgade to an LS2 or better yet a stroker with the appropriate heads and cam to go with it. I was not ever planning on re-using the '98 block anyway when it comes rebuild time.
Might not make sense, but i would rather do that than pull and tear down a working engine just to upgrade the rod bolts, when i already have 80K on the motor now.
Old 10-27-2005, 12:25 AM
  #19  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
Camaro99SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The 98's are the only years that have working temp guages. Later models all have dummy guages that read near 210 no matter what. Also, 98 and 01 had slightly bigger injectors.

Jason
Old 11-11-2005, 01:18 PM
  #20  
Launching!
 
bulletLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Guatemala City.
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

probably my camaro was assembled on MONDAY, because the one dum fk that did probably came to work with a hangover!
a lot of stuf had failed.
IE: how do you make purposely (spelling) a Hyd pump to fail....
or your alternator (with only a 100w amp extra) to OVERCHARGE
or your fuel pump to go out at 367 Km FROM BAND DEALERSHIP NEW
or a window motor to stick
or the stop lamp constantly burning up
or the gearbox to get stuck on 3rd
or the gearbox to pop up 3rd
or the anti roll bar anchoring point in the chasis to be ripped out....

and so on,,,,,.........


Quick Reply: 98 Model year LS1 vs. other years



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:21 PM.