Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Milled heads and bad geometry

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-25-2005, 04:08 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
KALEL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: fortress of solitude
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Milled heads and bad geometry

My heads are milled .030. I've doing something thinking and talked with a buddy of mine, and I'm pretty sure that I'm losing some juice due to the valves remaining open. My buddy said he's read that some take some preload off the lifter by tightening the rockers, then turning them back one turn. I'm not sure if that will work with .030 though. What would be the best way to fix this problem. Adjustable rockers? something else?
Old 10-25-2005, 06:19 PM
  #2  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (10)
 
Brak Attack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Panama City, FL
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A friend of mine just recently had the same problem you speak of. He did a head and cam swap and had too much lifter preload giving him only a 10RWHP gain! He first did a compression test to see where that was at and it was low (140's). He took a 1/2 turn out of each rocker and redid the test and he was seeing 210's across the board. The main culprit for his problem was the fact that he was using stock legth pushrods with heads that were milled .016. My heads are milled .030 and I am using the 7.350 length pushrods and I never had any problems. I would do a compression test and see what you get for starters.
Old 10-26-2005, 09:08 AM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
GuitsBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6,249
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

With stock rockers, backing off the bolt does nothing for you since youre just tightening the pivot against the rocker boss. They are NON ADJUSTABLE. The most correct way to fix it is with a shorter pushrods. Another option is to shim the rockers up higher with a washer underneath. Youll still tighten to 22 ft. lbs. but now the rocker will be .015 higher (or whatever you shimmed to).
Old 10-26-2005, 09:21 AM
  #4  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (21)
 
Hugger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Olive Branch MS/Memphis
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I was asking this a while back. I have 7.40 pushrods, 6.0L heads milled .030 with LS6 valves (which I believe are longer than stock, correct me if I am wrong). I couldn't decide which to length pushrods to go with. Last time I figured it, I think I needed somewhere in between a 7.35 and 7.40. Any opinions? Is there a calculation I can use to figure this out?
Old 10-26-2005, 09:33 AM
  #5  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
gomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Confederacy
Posts: 3,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Hugger
I was asking this a while back. I have 7.40 pushrods, 6.0L heads milled .030 with LS6 valves (which I believe are longer than stock, correct me if I am wrong). I couldn't decide which to length pushrods to go with. Last time I figured it, I think I needed somewhere in between a 7.35 and 7.40. Any opinions? Is there a calculation I can use to figure this out?
The last two .030 milled setups I did, both needed 7.350 pushrods. It's much better to be slightly loose than too tight. Besides the milling on the heads, the valve height that is set when the machine shop does the valvejob plays into the PR lengtht.
Old 10-26-2005, 09:36 AM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (42)
 
SUTTERERMAN85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North Fort Worth
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

you might want to try some 7.350. i think that LS6 valves are a little longer not for sure though i think i heard that somewhere. if they are LS1's milled .030 then you prob do need shorter ones. what cam are you running? also you cannot just loosen the rocker bolts. first off the bolts would come loose and there is nothing that will align them cause they have to be tight again the head mount to stay straight.
Old 10-26-2005, 09:49 AM
  #7  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (21)
 
Hugger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Olive Branch MS/Memphis
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I did have a good valve job done on the heads when I had them milled. I have a 228/228 .571/.571 on a 113. I guess I need to do a compression check to see for sure. The car doesn't feel down on power though.
Old 10-26-2005, 09:52 AM
  #8  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (10)
 
Brak Attack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Panama City, FL
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

To clear up any misconceptions my friend backed off the rockers a half turn for troubleshooting purposes. He ordered the shorter pushrods to correct his problem.
Old 10-26-2005, 11:06 AM
  #9  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
Viper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 4,908
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Cam base circle plays into the equation as well.

I'm running AFR 205's milled .018 and had to use a 7.350 PR.
Old 10-26-2005, 11:29 AM
  #10  
TECH Regular
 
Mirek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Berkley, MI
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

AFR's are not the same as stock heads with respect to required pushrod length when they are milled. Of course the cam base-circle comes into play but mine are milled .030 and I run 7.4 as recommended to me by LG. Vinci used to have this AFR Head/Pushrod info on their web-site.
Old 10-26-2005, 02:20 PM
  #11  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (28)
 
TAQuickness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 3,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

there is a push rod length calculator in the cam guide sticky
Old 10-26-2005, 04:44 PM
  #12  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (21)
 
Hugger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Olive Branch MS/Memphis
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Well according to the handy pushrod calculator I am ok. The calculator says that I need 7.4095. I would have thought it would be less than that. Does anyone know offhand how much longer and LS6 valve is than a stock LS1 valve?
-Josh
Old 10-26-2005, 04:55 PM
  #13  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (55)
 
Derek98z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Raymore, MO
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

MTI suggested I continue to run 7.4's with my .030 milled heads and just shim the perch
Old 10-26-2005, 05:32 PM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
KALEL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: fortress of solitude
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have absolute speed stg II heads milled .030. They are an ls1 style head. They do have bigger valves
Old 10-27-2005, 05:19 AM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
 
MNR-0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

All comp cams use an LS6 blank billet which is 0.7mm shorter in radius. Assuming you mill the heads 0.030", that equates to approx. 0.7mm so you are OK. If you then use LS6 valves, you will increase preload since they are 0.6mm longer than stock LS1 valves. That's about 0.025" so in theory you would need a 7.375" rod. However, the difference in performance, I would have thought, with that additional preload, would be irrelevant. In that case you could shim the rockers up 0.025" and be done.
Old 10-27-2005, 05:37 AM
  #16  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
02Reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Swainsboro GA
Posts: 780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MNR-0
All comp cams use an LS6 blank billet which is 0.7mm shorter in radius. Assuming you mill the heads 0.030", that equates to approx. 0.7mm so you are OK. If you then use LS6 valves, you will increase preload since they are 0.6mm longer than stock LS1 valves. That's about 0.025" so in theory you would need a 7.375" rod. However, the difference in performance, I would have thought, with that additional preload, would be irrelevant. In that case you could shim the rockers up 0.025" and be done.
Not trying to bash on you or anything, but how do you know this about the comp cams? They dont even know themselves if you call and ask them.
Old 10-27-2005, 01:35 PM
  #17  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
KALEL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: fortress of solitude
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MNR-0
All comp cams use an LS6 blank billet which is 0.7mm shorter in radius. Assuming you mill the heads 0.030", that equates to approx. 0.7mm so you are OK. If you then use LS6 valves, you will increase preload since they are 0.6mm longer than stock LS1 valves. That's about 0.025" so in theory you would need a 7.375" rod. However, the difference in performance, I would have thought, with that additional preload, would be irrelevant. In that case you could shim the rockers up 0.025" and be done.
Do you know how much the lifters preload before they are fully compressed? What would be best to shim the rockers up also?
Old 10-27-2005, 06:56 PM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Phil'sC5vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tampa
Posts: 1,074
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mirek
AFR's are not the same as stock heads with respect to required pushrod length when they are milled. Of course the cam base-circle comes into play but mine are milled .030 and I run 7.4 as recommended to me by LG. Vinci used to have this AFR Head/Pushrod info on their web-site.
My AFR are milled to 61cc and I was told my 7.40 rods are fine for my TR224 cam




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:58 AM.