adjustable or non-rockers?
11-15-2005, 10:35 PM
#1
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fort Worth, Tx
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
adjustable or non-rockers? With an all stock motor and future plans of a mild cam(224/.563probably), why would I choose adjustable over non-adjustable rockers or vise versa. Any advantage of one over the other? Thanks alot.
By the way I'm stayin hydr. roller if that matters.
By the way I'm stayin hydr. roller if that matters.
11-16-2005, 05:39 AM
#2
Well, personal opinion here, I went with the Crane adjustables. They are expensive compared to just staying with the stockers, but I like the ability to adjust them and also I think they help keep the valve train quiet which was a big thing for me as my wife heard a cammed car this past summer that had a lot of sewing machine noise and told me she didn't want our car to sound like that. Perfect excuse to spend the extra $$$. 
11-16-2005, 11:29 AM
#3
FormerVendor
iTrader: (33)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lake in the Hills, IL
Posts: 5,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No need to go adjustable for a hydrolic cam. Stick with a set of good roller rockers for ease of setup and maitainance. Harland Sharp 1.7 $360
Nate
Nate