Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

FlowTech/EDC Cam Reveiw

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-28-2005, 08:06 PM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
LS2 Pontiac GTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default FlowTech/EDC Cam Reveiw

I recently installed my FlowTech custom cam by Ed Curtis (EDC). Here are the specs on the car and the cam:

2004 GTO A4

Kooks 1.75" LT's w/Cats
K&N AirCharger
Borla Cat-Back Exhaust
SLP P/P Throttle Body
HP Tuners Dyno Tune By Nick @ NewTech Performance
EDC Cam 220/224 .596/.589 @113 LSA
Patriot "Gold" Dual Springs
Comp Cams 7.4 Pushrods



The Good This cam on my setup came within 0.7 RWHP of my goal. Im very happy with the results as far as power go's. The tune I have is somewhat concervative do to my climate. The Dyno numbers the car put down is with only 23 Degrees of timing @ WOTThe cam pulls hard from 2000 RPM all the way to red line of 6300. As you can see the power starts to die off after 6300. This cam pretty much keeps the stock powerband wich was very important to me. Also I can use this cam with some ETP or AFR heads down the road. With heads this cam will really be able to shine.

The Bad I think Ed misunderstood my goals and my definition of a sleeper cam. I did tell him that I wanted to hear a slight lope however, but in reality by car is fairly lopy to me. There is increased valetrtain noise which can be expected. I did have trouble getting the cam to idle well when at a stop and when coming to a stop. I believe I have resolved my issue with opening the Trottle Body Blade and raising the idle to 700 RPM. However the car does "cruise control" a bit, which doesnt bother me, in fact its kinds cool . Probably getting a 2600 or 2800 stall Converter would make the car a lot more drivable. When cold the car does run a litte rough and surges just a bit, but once warmed up its fine. I did have the Flashing SES light issue, which usually means a misfire even though my Tuner (Nick @ NewTech Performance) did delete that code. It only happens when idling and go's off after 30 seconds or so. I dont believe the car is misfiring sice it runs fine, plus it made good numbers on the Dyno. Its only done it twice. Maybe someone can chime in on this issue?

Final Thoughs Overall I am happy with my cam. Eds service was pretty good. He knows a ton about cams, more than I ever will . The only thing that truned me off was that my cam was shipped late to me. It was suppose to be at my place by a certain date and he promised it would be, but it wasnt. I had to cancel my appointment at the shop reschedule time off work and reschedule my hotel reservation, since I had to go out of town for the install. I'll try and get a video posted soon!


Old 11-28-2005, 08:15 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
66deuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Goshen,In.
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yes,a higher stall TQ will definately make the car more drivable.and your tune might need "tweaked" a little bit to help the idle and cruise control issues.(i know this from experience)it's easy to dyno tune a car for WOT power,but sometimes the drivability takes a little work.good numbers
Old 11-28-2005, 08:48 PM
  #3  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
mrr23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i wonder if they can tune out that dip you have from 3500 rpms to 4500 rpms? fixing that, might get you the .7 rwhp you are missing from your goal. other than that, real good job there.
Old 11-28-2005, 08:56 PM
  #4  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (24)
 
Haans249's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 2,045
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Just so you know, stock idle is around 790-800 rpms, so thats probably why you're having so much trouble with idle, its pretty low IMO. That would also explain some of your lope, and possibly your code. I don't think you have to open the blade more, just drill mod the hole, and raise your rpms more, and I think you'll be well off.

Nice numbers regardless, add some heads, and you'll be looking at probably 20-30 hp more. Add a 90/90 ontop of that, and you'll be looking at 15-20 more. That should put you around 380-400hp.

I'm waiting to hear about my cam...can't wait to see what he says!

Regards,
Adrian
Old 11-28-2005, 09:12 PM
  #5  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
LS2 Pontiac GTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just so you know, stock idle is around 790-800 rpms
Not with the 04 GTO with the Automatic. Stock is 550.

yes,a higher stall TQ will definately make the car more drivable.and your tune might need "tweaked" a little bit to help the idle and cruise control issues.(i know this from experience)it's easy to dyno tune a car for WOT power,but sometimes the drivability takes a little
I did recently vist NewTech and Nick wasnt able to come up with a reason why the light comes on. He did tweak the tune at idle and raised the idle from 600 to 700. He said I would need a higher stall converter to raise the idle anymore or the car would cruise control even worse.
Old 11-29-2005, 06:01 AM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

What you need is like a 2800 stall and (2.5>2.7 str)

The str is important as you want a looser verter to raise your idle to like 800.
Old 11-29-2005, 12:17 PM
  #7  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (24)
 
Haans249's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 2,045
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Thumbs up

Originally Posted by LS1 PONTIAC GTO
Not with the 04 GTO with the Automatic. Stock is 550.
My bad, didn't pay attention to what car you had. Please excuse me for my ignorance
Old 11-29-2005, 10:36 PM
  #8  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
LS2 Pontiac GTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So what cause the radom flashing SES light? Im still baffled how the light can come back on after the code has be removed from the PCM. What can be done to elimate this?
Old 11-29-2005, 11:14 PM
  #9  
Restricted User
iTrader: (9)
 
CAT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 7,603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The P0300 code shouldnt be turned off, it should be tuned. Simple find where the pcm is having sensitivity issues, and adjust the numerical value usually raise misfire at low and med tables, (32767 is the high side) I generally add 2,000 or so around the counts and see how that does. If he is using HPT 2.xx then you can do a no mil report as well as disable, two different things.

Stock idle on my 2000 Z28 was also 550 at warm temp, 800 is only when its cold or cool with AC.

DO NOT DRILL the blade. Thats such a PITA way to do it. Flip the screw, adjust as needed, reset the TPS each time. Then follow-up with tuning, like effective area shifting etc.

On the STR I disagree with Predator, I would stay a litte more 2.2 +/- .2. Reason is the IRS wont be shocked to death from the higher STR, and the STR wont make the idle any better, not sure why you'd say that? Looser is nice for some setups, but with this particular combo, and considering the IRS I would stay a little tighter rather than looser, just my $.02
Old 11-29-2005, 11:23 PM
  #10  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
LS2 Pontiac GTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for you input. I was thinking of a Yank 2800 or Vig 2600-2800. I would like a converter that returns the car to like stock drivabilty. What are your thoughts on which one I should get to achieve my goal?
Old 11-29-2005, 11:41 PM
  #11  
Restricted User
iTrader: (9)
 
CAT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 7,603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Smallest TC I have had is a Yank 3000 and it seemed like stock, after an hour or so driving. But even that lil stall was blast to drive.
Old 11-29-2005, 11:57 PM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

On the STR I disagree with Predator, I would stay a litte more 2.2 +/- .2. Reason is the IRS wont be shocked to death from the higher STR, and the STR wont make the idle any better, not sure why you'd say that? Looser is nice for some setups, but with this particular combo, and considering the IRS I would stay a little tighter rather than looser, just my $.02
IRS shocked to death? IRS is way stronger than any 10 bolt out there. And I wasn't saying 4000+ stall, just 2800 TRUE stall.
The str is part of the loose/tight verter characteristic. His idle is too low and if raised it will pull on the brakes at idle and have a "cruising" effect off idle. A looser converter will negate that effect and allow higher idle setting.
Also idle tuning by raising timing at idle will help with surging and idle hickups.

As far as "going back to stock feeling", your car is now cammed, if you want stock feeling, you should have gone with a 115+ lsa cam not a 113.
Old 11-30-2005, 12:07 AM
  #13  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
LS2 Pontiac GTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What off the shelf TC will get me close to my goal.
Old 11-30-2005, 07:45 AM
  #14  
6600 rpm clutch dump of death Administrator
 
J-Rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,983
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

You can add timing at idle and it will kill that chop. It will smooth the cam out, and you'll be "stealthy" again.
Old 11-30-2005, 08:54 AM
  #15  
Pontiacerator
iTrader: (12)
 
RevGTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wichita KS / Rancho San Diego
Posts: 6,125
Received 194 Likes on 163 Posts

Default

You may also want to look at your timing during that torque dip between 3500-4500.
Old 11-30-2005, 10:28 AM
  #16  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,651
Received 1,099 Likes on 721 Posts

Default

I can notice a 220/224//113.

I think stuff like 224/224/115 can be very sleeperish.
Old 12-01-2005, 08:24 PM
  #17  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 137 Likes on 114 Posts

Default

Yank SS3200 would be a good verter since you have 3.46 rear in the GTO, and it was designed with a 3.15 and Vette in mind--should be "good" around town--but, getting it tuned further will help more than anything.



Quick Reply: FlowTech/EDC Cam Reveiw



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:35 AM.