Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

AFR 205's or 225's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-04-2005, 12:01 AM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
just-a-z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default AFR 205's or 225's

I have narrowed it down to these 2. Which ones are better for a stock LS1 block with a 232/236 112 LSA Cam, Yank SS 3600, 12 Bolt Moser 3.73, and Full bolt-ons and suspension. I will also be running 100 octane fuel on it.
Old 12-04-2005, 01:44 AM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
white2001s10's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Fairview Heights Illinois
Posts: 1,851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Generally speaking, the larger volume intake port is a better match for a larger cubic inch engine, or a smaller engine that turns extreme RPM. The general reason for the increased volume is to slow air velocity down in the port so that it doesn't reach unacceptable levels before the engines power peak.

Many porters go big on the port because it makes it easier to get big flow numbers, and that's what seems to sell best lately. Many times a big port will dyno higher, where sometimes the smaller port performs better on the track. Being combination specific it's impossible IMO to get a specific answer for your case. I'm just relaying information and not making a prediction myself.

AFR would probably be the best place to get the advice from.

Personally, if I was never planning to go bigger engine I'd stay small. If I was planning more cubes in the future I'd go ahead with the big ports.
Old 12-04-2005, 02:25 AM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
just-a-z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

thanks for the advice, it is highly appreciated!! Anybody else have something to say on this please feel free.
Old 12-04-2005, 08:19 AM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

205's for sure. AFR built them with stock bore in mind and although they only have 205 ports, the velocity in those heads are hard to duplicate.
Old 12-04-2005, 01:10 PM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
just-a-z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

damn so I got 2 different people telling me different things. I am planning on going bigger someday, so I might go with the 225's, seeing that I am getting them for 2100 shipped Brand new and ready to go. I am up for more opinions though, if you could get some 225's for the price of 205's for your stock ls1 block, would you do it?
Old 12-04-2005, 01:22 PM
  #6  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
DanZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cali/Bay Area
Posts: 3,412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

IF your going bigger cubes in the near future, then the 225's for sure. If your years away from doing it, then 205's IMO. I think both guys are saying the same thing. Go with 205's for a a small bore and 225's with a biger bore. The 225's on a small bore will probably not do as well in the lower RPM as the 205's but probably pull harder in the way upper RPM. Personally, I could care less about the money difference, I'd go with what works the best with my setup IMHO.

Dan
Old 12-04-2005, 01:35 PM
  #7  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (7)
 
Sharpe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Southeastern IL
Posts: 4,997
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by just-a-z
damn so I got 2 different people telling me different things.
What?! White2001s10 and PREDATOR-Z both told you the same thing!
Old 12-04-2005, 01:36 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
white2001s10's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Fairview Heights Illinois
Posts: 1,851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yeah I saw he had a Yank 3600 and 3.73's so I figure the larger head wouldn't hurt him too bad overall.
Old 12-04-2005, 01:46 PM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
just-a-z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

thank you guys for the advice and your opinions were greatly helpful. I am going to go ahead and go with the 225's seeing that I plan on going bigger within the year. Thanks, Sergio
Old 12-04-2005, 02:56 PM
  #10  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (7)
 
Sharpe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Southeastern IL
Posts: 4,997
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Is anyone thinking of that Bacardi Silver commercial right now?

"You know Sergio?"

"Yeah, he's the tall-short guy, sorta fat-skinny?"

"You do know Sergio!"
Old 12-04-2005, 03:43 PM
  #11  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
mike c.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: mi
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

for your ci's the 205's. i've had three sets of heads and the 205's are bad azz. my car runs near 10's motor 11.1@124 ,stock weight(and i still don't have all the boltons yet). if the car was set up for n/a it would go 10.7-10.8's motor as is. get them and you'll be happy. goodluck to ya.

Last edited by mike c.; 12-04-2005 at 03:50 PM.
Old 12-05-2005, 12:24 AM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
just-a-z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

pretty funny Sharpe! Thanks for the advice and I think I may have to look for some AFR 205's then. BTW, anybody know if the absolute stage 2.5 heads are any good?
Old 12-05-2005, 04:14 PM
  #13  
11 & 7 Second Clubs
 
Race Car Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Motorhome, Freeways, Truckstops, Pits
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The 205s will be enough for you.
Originally Posted by just-a-z
I have narrowed it down to these 2. Which ones are better for a stock LS1 block with a 232/236 112 LSA Cam, Yank SS 3600, 12 Bolt Moser 3.73, and Full bolt-ons and suspension. I will also be running 100 octane fuel on it.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:46 AM.