black_z

iTrader: (4)

What are the advantages/disadvantages to these 2 cams? Is the 236/230 for cars with better exhaust?

TR 236/230 .602/.575 112 LSA

TR 230/236 .590/.598 112 LSA

I will also be spraying the car 100-150 shot, so I am leaning toward the 230/236. I have a 6-speed car, my mods include pacesetter LT's, ORY, cutout, lid, FTRA, I will have 4.11's and an LS6 intake.

orangeapeel

iTrader: (18)

Yes.

The other one would be a better forced induction or stock(ish) exhaust setup.
One is a traditional split (230/236) and one is a reverse (236/230).

orangeapeel

iTrader: (18)

If you are gonna spray even with that smaller sized shot the 230/236 would be a better option IMO. You would generally want the exhaust opened up a tad more. So go with your leaning feeling.

black_z

iTrader: (4)

TTT How are people liking these cams? Thunder do you have any input?

ty_ty13

iTrader: (42)

230/236 is my cam... i put 399rwhp through a sloppy A4 and SS4000e with 12 bolt and 4.10 gears...

black_z

iTrader: (4)

Do you have a dyno graph? 399 is stout through an A4, not so sure about the tq number though.

INTENESS

iTrader: (4)

I have the TR 230/236 112 lsa on heads cam car and put down 430 rwhp thru a 12 bolt with 411's.It sounds mean as hell to goodluck with which ever one you chosse.

ty_ty13

iTrader: (42)

tq was like 367rw.... the converter and tranny was starting to slip really bad since then....
ill grab the graph at work... if i remember

black_z

iTrader: (4)

Auto or M6? Any track times?

Phil'sC5vette

iTrader: (4)

Tell me more about the TR230 cam. Im thinking to switching the Tr224 and installing the TR230
I have AFR heads milled . 20 off
anyone with P/V issues?

RaNsOm

iTrader: (2)

the 230/236 will be alot better for nitrous than the 236/230 cam. I plan on adding a 125shot in the near future for shitsngiggles and a nice 10 second slip.

I love the 230/236 design, not sure how close it is to the Comp Cams grind but its an amazing cam.