Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

What is the advantage to ZO6 valves

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-22-2006, 06:36 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Red98C5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Brick, NJ
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default What is the advantage to ZO6 valves

IF you were doing a very mild port job on LS1 heads, NOT the ZO6 head, and used the lightweight ZO6 valves that GM put in the production cars, is there an advantage? If the valve train is lighter then you should be able to use lighter open pressure valve springs and still have excellent RPM before valve float. I know the valves are longer then the stock LS1 jobs, but if your ordering pushrods anyway, just get the correct length and that is not an issue...right?? Then is there any real advantages to these valves over the standard LS1 pieces?? I do not plan on putting oversize valves in the heads, or will not use Stage ???? with the oversize as the car is not hitting the RPM that they will "do a better job" at so why loose the bottom end power. I've used and do use the "bigger" head systems, but the performance is almost the same down low, so why bother. I do not want the tall gears and high rpm bands of the "ultra" race setup, this is a dual purpose car and I want gas mileage and performance. Just so you know, my Vette ran 11.30 @ 120 thru the cats, stock exhaust and gets 28 mpg on the highway and is emissions legal, so it can be done and if I did not get a bad cam the new converter would have made the car even faster, by the way it's also 3500 lbs while racing.
Old 02-22-2006, 07:04 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
white2001s10's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Fairview Heights Illinois
Posts: 1,851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

They're 25% lighter so yes you can use weaker valvesprings which should benefit your gas mileage.
Old 02-22-2006, 11:10 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (19)
 
BADFNZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Dyess AFB, TX
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Actually, I believe they're 40% lighter from what I've seen. Benefits are less chance of valve float, less spring wear, and the ability to spin it higher.

White2001s10, nice C17 avatar
Old 02-22-2006, 11:14 PM
  #4  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Beast96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Sounds like your answering your own question.
Old 02-23-2006, 12:22 AM
  #5  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
ShevrolayZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

The 02 and up Z06's used a lighter valve than the 2001 FWIW.
Old 02-23-2006, 12:40 AM
  #6  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (16)
 
mr2guru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kansas City Area
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Only the exhaust valves are sodium filled. They are lighter but that isn't the point.
The sodium in the valve liquifies and draws heat away from the valve face up the stem and transfers the heat to the head.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:12 PM.