Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Forged 347 !

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-07-2006, 01:56 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
quickneSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Forged 347 !

I have a question about my engine. I am currently having my engine rebuilt and will be getting it forged out (pistons,rods, etc..). I plan on putting a TR224 in while its out.The engine had Comp 1.85 rockers so might reuse them depending on your answers. Will that rocker ratio be O.K with that cam? I believe it like a .611 or .612 lift!

TIA
JON
Old 03-07-2006, 10:45 PM
  #2  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
quickneSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

TTT!

I know some techs can answer this!
Old 03-07-2006, 11:54 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
quickneSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Damn 47 views; and no responses?
Old 03-08-2006, 02:07 AM
  #4  
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
Tkami129's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm not sure but you should try and contact Thunder Racing and get a profesional opinion.....bytheway, why are you going with "only a tr224"...i would be pushing for a cam at least in the 230's...wish good luck with you combo
Old 03-08-2006, 02:13 AM
  #5  
ЯєŧąяĐ Єl¡m¡иąŧøя ™
iTrader: (18)
 
orangeapeel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Justin, TX
Posts: 16,083
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I would go atleast 230's. but there is nothing wrong with proven 224.
Old 03-08-2006, 02:29 AM
  #6  
Launching!
iTrader: (10)
 
TAF Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Queen Creek, AZ
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

what springs you running?
Old 03-08-2006, 02:30 AM
  #7  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
DocEwww's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

The rockers should be ok depending on vavle springs...but I personally would just go with a larger cam.
Old 03-08-2006, 06:48 PM
  #8  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
quickneSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was thinking of doing something in the low 230's w/ a .59? lift. Would 918's be O.K. or should I do dual or 921 springs? My only issue would be gas mileage in my auto Daily Driver What do you guys think?
Old 03-08-2006, 09:43 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
daryl2cb@yahoo.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Greensburg,PA
Posts: 1,882
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

918's should work with the 224, but any bigger do it once right go 921's and make sure you warm them up every start they are a little more brittle(918), but the duals can help you out here. by the way the 918's are rated at max .600 lift
Old 03-08-2006, 09:56 PM
  #10  
Banned
iTrader: (4)
 
skipperbisket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: FTW, TX
Posts: 2,665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

you should do a custom grind since you're doing a nice forged motor. get something like a Trex cam's duration with less LOBE lift to work with the 1.85 rockers to come up with similar lift of the TREX.
Old 03-09-2006, 12:32 AM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
 
BigDaddyBry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ridgecrest, CA
Posts: 1,897
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Yeah, I come up with .613 (vs. .563 w/1.7).

FYI: Thunder recommends to not use 1.8 rockers due to the fast ramp rate of the cam. I'm sure this extends to the 1.85s.
Old 03-09-2006, 11:13 AM
  #12  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
Camaro99SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Go back to 1.7's either with the stock rockers or aftermarket rollers. There is too much side loading IMO with anything above 1.7 rockers on these motors. That bottom end will be reliable to 7500+. IMO, there's no reason to limit yourself to the 224 cam. I'd be looking at the F13 or F14 from Futral, TSP 233/239, their Torquer cam, what Thunder offers, and maybe even their T-Rex depending on if you emissions, your heads, and gearing.

If I were you, a set of TEA Stage 1.5 5.3 heads milled to give you 11-11.5:1 compression or equivalent with one of the cams I mentioned, would be a great value and still be pretty torquey for daily driver use if you keep the compression up there.

Jason
Old 03-09-2006, 09:22 PM
  #13  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
quickneSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would definitely want to put a bigger cam in it, but I got the 224 for $150.I'm building a house right now so funds are tied up. So thats the reason for that! I will prolly put a hundred shot in a couple months for a lil more fun.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:14 AM.