Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

anyone using these cams?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-17-2006, 08:56 PM
  #1  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
92zcamaroperson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default anyone using these cams?

Is anyone using any of the NX cams? Whats your opinion on them? Any dyno sheets on them?
Old 04-18-2006, 10:09 AM
  #2  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
92zcamaroperson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

nobody?
Old 04-18-2006, 10:10 AM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
ls1wannabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Macomb
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Never heard of them personally you might want to do a search for them.
Old 04-18-2006, 10:30 AM
  #4  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
92zcamaroperson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

did. all I can find is a post by nitrous dave trying to sell them.
Old 04-18-2006, 10:31 AM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
ls1wannabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Macomb
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

So i take it that you are sparying with your car then.
Old 04-18-2006, 10:36 AM
  #6  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
92zcamaroperson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would like to but not a huge shot. I just want to know if the difference between these cams and say a comp cam of relative size is huge. I know it probably would make up for it when sprayed but obviously I wont be spraying all the time so I still want good power.
Old 04-18-2006, 10:38 AM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
ls1wannabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Macomb
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Read patrick's post about torque i think a page back or so it has some very useful information. It also helps to explian why bigger is not always better.
Old 04-18-2006, 10:39 AM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
ls1wannabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Macomb
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iii-internal-engine/481382-torque-coming-out-my-ears-cam-change.html
Old 04-18-2006, 10:42 AM
  #9  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
92zcamaroperson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have read that thread. Great information. I have the NX stage 2 cam 224/228 561/571 that I bought from a guy only because it seemed like a good deal. I guess I can just stick it in and see how it performs. If I dont like it or I get less than desired results ill get something else. I just didnt know if the cam was that different from a comp 224/228 cam.
Old 04-18-2006, 01:18 PM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

It is on XE lobes instead of XE-R
Old 04-18-2006, 03:52 PM
  #11  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
92zcamaroperson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the nx stage 2 cam has XE lobes? Those will go better with 918 spings right? Because those are the springs that I have now.
Old 04-18-2006, 04:20 PM
  #12  
Banned
 
bluecamaroz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
It is on XE lobes instead of XE-R
How are the two different.
Old 04-18-2006, 04:23 PM
  #13  
Kleeborp the Moderator™
iTrader: (11)
 
MeentSS02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 10,317
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

XE-R has a faster ramp rate if I'm not mistaken...
Old 04-18-2006, 04:34 PM
  #14  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
92zcamaroperson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

that is the difference. Its harder on your valvetrain but its supposed to make for a nice choppy idle and better power.
Old 04-18-2006, 04:43 PM
  #15  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
calongo_SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

XE-R lobes will be harder on the valve train, but will make better low rpm power and better drivability.
Old 04-18-2006, 04:50 PM
  #16  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
92zcamaroperson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

realy? I thought the XE had the better drivability?
Old 04-18-2006, 05:38 PM
  #17  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Not at those durations, ramp rate is less harsh, it will have a little less under the curve power than XE-R. Tuning not an issue with nowadays software.
XE lobes are good street lobes




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:02 PM.