116 Lsa
#1
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Troy,MI.
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
116 Lsa
I am thinking of getting the TSP 224/224/.581 cam with a 116 LSA. What are the disadvantages of this compared to a 114 or 112 LSA? I'm looking for a smooth idle.
#5
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Troy,MI.
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by vettenuts
Unless it has a lot of advance ground in, do you know what the advance is for this cam?
#6
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Troy,MI.
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bjamick
ya the 116lsa will have a real easy idle not a rough one, your powerband i believe will come in at a later rpm because of the high lsa.
#7
TECH Senior Member
On a116+0 it will peak in the 6300 neighbourhood and rev till past 6800
Advance it 116=2 and then midrange trq comes back into play while still carrying past 6600.
I used to run a 224/220 116+0 and it was very smooth (nervous rapid chopchop), but good number capability and netted 11.3 H/C with 11.0:1 SCR
The 224/224 will act the same but be a little more exhaust biased.
Advance it 116=2 and then midrange trq comes back into play while still carrying past 6600.
I used to run a 224/220 116+0 and it was very smooth (nervous rapid chopchop), but good number capability and netted 11.3 H/C with 11.0:1 SCR
The 224/224 will act the same but be a little more exhaust biased.
Trending Topics
#8
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Troy,MI.
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
On a116+0 it will peak in the 6300 neighbourhood and rev till past 6800
Advance it 116=2 and then midrange trq comes back into play while still carrying past 6600.
I used to run a 224/220 116+0 and it was very smooth (nervous rapid chopchop), but good number capability and netted 11.3 H/C with 11.0:1 SCR
The 224/224 will act the same but be a little more exhaust biased.
Advance it 116=2 and then midrange trq comes back into play while still carrying past 6600.
I used to run a 224/220 116+0 and it was very smooth (nervous rapid chopchop), but good number capability and netted 11.3 H/C with 11.0:1 SCR
The 224/224 will act the same but be a little more exhaust biased.
#10
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Troy,MI.
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
Yeah on a 116+2, be prepared to rev higher like at least to 6600.
Thanks
#11
TECH Senior Member
I would prefer a 115+1
see it has to do with EVO
116+4 has EVO of 52 pushing trq band higher up (less in midrange)
while the 115+1 has an EVO of 48 which will be more pronounced in midrange
with a -6 overlap it is still in the good idle not to choppy spectrum.
see it has to do with EVO
116+4 has EVO of 52 pushing trq band higher up (less in midrange)
while the 115+1 has an EVO of 48 which will be more pronounced in midrange
with a -6 overlap it is still in the good idle not to choppy spectrum.
#12
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Troy,MI.
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
I would prefer a 115+1
see it has to do with EVO
116+4 has EVO of 52 pushing trq band higher up (less in midrange)
while the 115+1 has an EVO of 48 which will be more pronounced in midrange
with a -6 overlap it is still in the good idle not to choppy spectrum.
see it has to do with EVO
116+4 has EVO of 52 pushing trq band higher up (less in midrange)
while the 115+1 has an EVO of 48 which will be more pronounced in midrange
with a -6 overlap it is still in the good idle not to choppy spectrum.
Do you like this more than the 116+2 ?
#13
TECH Senior Member
Yes..
just remember that cams need to be degreed to make sure it is installed on that ICL.
And before you ask, dot to dot doesn't necessarily mean it is on that ICL even if in the grind. An adjustable t-chain is necessary.
just remember that cams need to be degreed to make sure it is installed on that ICL.
And before you ask, dot to dot doesn't necessarily mean it is on that ICL even if in the grind. An adjustable t-chain is necessary.
#14
Originally Posted by lilbuddy1587
Why take away from DCR/lowend? a 224 on 112 will have a smooth/MILD lope
u want a smooth idle? Get some new motor mounts.
u want a smooth idle? Get some new motor mounts.
Anyway, yankeevert...yes you will have a silk smooth idle with the 116LSA. You basically lose a little low end grunt. Most of your powerband will be up high.
Last edited by eamador11; 09-18-2006 at 08:12 AM.
#15
Originally Posted by YankeeVert.
Thanks for the input. I have a 02 Corvette with a SS3600 stall and 3.73 rear. Do you think this cam will be a good match for my setup?I'm looking for a smooth idle and good drivability in traffic.Most of my driving is below 50mph.
#16
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BTR, La
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't mean to change subjects here, but could he install adjustable cam bushings to change the ICL? I've seen them before, but don't know how they're favored in the LS1 world.
Ben T.
Ben T.
#18
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Troy,MI.
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by eamador11
Trust me, with todays tuning capability, you can still get away with 114LSA. And this way you wont lose as much tq down low like with a 116. I know this because i did that exact thing on the first cam upgrade on my vette. then i swapped to a 224/228@114. it has lope but the car still idles smooth inside.
Thanks
#20
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Troy,MI.
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by CHRISPY
Are you street/strip or street only? What exhaust are you running and what emissions requirements? Stock heads or ported?