Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

918`s vs double springs package

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-23-2006, 12:22 PM
  #1  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Bader-X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 918`s vs double springs package

Hi
I`m planning to go Beehive comp 918 (using stock retainers and lucks means saving money right?) my reasons are and I need correction as this is the idea that I have from reading and not sure:

1-they are more durable than double springs (more springs life milage with the same cam) <===a cam with 580-600 lift with the double springs being rated to 650 lift

2-they will make a little more power from the reduced valvetrain weight)

3-power band should be the same since the steel retainers beehive are almost the same weight of the titanium retainers on the double springs. (this might be only true to bbc changed over to beehive)
Old 10-23-2006, 01:17 PM
  #2  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
WizeAss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: by my computer
Posts: 2,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bader-X
Hi
I`m planning to go Beehive comp 918 (using stock retainers and lucks means saving money right?) my reasons are and I need correction as this is the idea that I have from reading and not sure:

1-they are more durable than double springs (more springs life milage with the same cam) <===a cam with 580-600 lift with the double springs being rated to 650 lift

2-they will make a little more power from the reduced valvetrain weight)

3-power band should be the same since the steel retainers beehive are almost the same weight of the titanium retainers on the double springs. (this might be only true to bbc changed over to beehive)

i agree with what you have said.... if going over .600 lift and taking the car up over the stock limiter I would suggest you consider dual springs. Otherwise the 918's are good up to .600 as a rule of thumb. Cheap insurance.
Old 10-23-2006, 04:05 PM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
ArcticZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 5,125
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I would say it would depend on what lobes your cam has. If you're running some XE-R lobes or something of the sort with higher ramp rates, then you might want to consider the dual springs. It all depends on how often you like changing your springs and the risk you're willing to take of one breaking.
Old 10-23-2006, 06:10 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
GuitsBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6,249
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

The extra piece of mind, plus the titanium retainers make the gold dual springs worth looking into on even mid sized cams such as yours and mine, IMO. I dont think youll give up any measurable ammount of power.
Old 10-23-2006, 06:25 PM
  #5  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
dnm12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Dual Springs!
Old 10-24-2006, 03:51 AM
  #6  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Bader-X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

so with a cam with a 600 lift and lower they`re enough even if on xe-r lobes?

all three points are correct?

say I order the t-rex on a 590 int 590 ext lift all I have to change is the springs(918) stock lucks and stock seals?
Old 10-24-2006, 03:59 AM
  #7  
ЯєŧąяĐ Єl¡m¡иąŧøя ™
iTrader: (18)
 
orangeapeel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Justin, TX
Posts: 16,083
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Why would you want to order the t-rex on that lift grind though? Sounds like if you are trying to get around having to get new springs that cam is not for you.

This is just my opinion on cams that go up that high: I would have a titanium retainer backing it as well as shims if (you stick with 918's). This will help out in the cases of valve float. You will have about 200-300 rpms of safety where the stockers would mushroom and fail....(this is only in severe cases of course).

Your better off with like a magic stick v3 or something like that. FWIW I run my 244/248 cam on shimmed 918's. They will go to .615 lift. It is a marketing thing for Comp Cams if I am not mistaken. They are undercutting the 918's for selling the 921 springs to users with +.600 lift cams.

All I am telling you is that you might want to really do your research on cams and valvetrain components before you plunge into this territory with mixed speculations.

Last edited by orangeapeel; 10-24-2006 at 04:04 AM.
Old 10-24-2006, 05:21 AM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
vettenuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Little Rhody
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by orangeapeel
where the stockers would mushroom and fail....
Are you saying the stock retainers would "mushroom" (deform) or they won't RPM as high?
Old 10-24-2006, 07:51 AM
  #9  
ЯєŧąяĐ Єl¡m¡иąŧøя ™
iTrader: (18)
 
orangeapeel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Justin, TX
Posts: 16,083
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by vettenuts
Are you saying the stock retainers would "mushroom" (deform) or they won't RPM as high?
Well, that was bad wording on my part. They have a better %'age of failing at higher RPMs. Not saying that they will, but that it can happen. floating a valve is no fun.
Old 10-25-2006, 11:23 AM
  #10  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Bader-X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

But I only want it to rev to 7000 rpm but I`ll shift @ 6500-6700 rpm
Old 10-26-2006, 11:53 PM
  #11  
On The Tree
 
macca33's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 60 mi SE of Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

On my car pre-cam/spring swap, I saw valve float at 5800rpm. If you wish to rev to anything over 6000 consistently, then at the very least, 918s are for you.

The cam choice will determine which spring set-up you should use.

Good luck with it,

Macca
Old 10-27-2006, 01:10 AM
  #12  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Bader-X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

any reason not to go with a t-rex with a 575-590 lift with a 918 and rev to 6800-7000 and shift @ 6500-6700?

like it will sure float with that rpm and cause damage
or
the springs won`t handle the aggressive designe of the t-rex

or anything else?
Old 10-27-2006, 02:46 AM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

smaller duration higher lifts cams will produce more power than big duration lower lift ones.
Old 10-27-2006, 07:11 AM
  #14  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
slow trap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: tennessee
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

if you are going to spin it to 7k you will need a decent sized stick because a small one will be out of breath by then.if you are set on spinning it to 7k something like the ms3 or similar with dual springs is what you need.
Old 10-27-2006, 08:46 AM
  #15  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
99camarosupersport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by GuitsBoy
The extra piece of mind, plus the titanium retainers make the gold dual springs worth looking into on even mid sized cams such as yours and mine, IMO. I dont think youll give up any measurable ammount of power.
Old 10-27-2006, 02:35 PM
  #16  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Bader-X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
smaller duration higher lifts cams will produce more power than big duration lower lift ones.
so a 220 220 650 650 110
will beat a
242 248 575 575 110 same ICL
in a race say from a roll both cars with the same mods assuming they were very close in the same race distance!

if that was true then I know nothing about cams
Old 10-27-2006, 03:17 PM
  #17  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
ArcticZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 5,125
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I think he meant more power under the curve/greater useable area of power.
Old 10-27-2006, 04:57 PM
  #18  
Launching!
iTrader: (9)
 
Ice Knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Bader-X
so a 220 220 650 650 110
will beat a
242 248 575 575 110 same ICL
in a race say from a roll both cars with the same mods assuming they were very close in the same race distance!

if that was true then I know nothing about cams
Maybe not that big of a difference in cam size...
Old 10-27-2006, 05:11 PM
  #19  
TECH Fanatic
 
gun5l1ng3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Laguna Niguel, CA
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have never really thought of it, but do dual springs add a lot of weight compared to the Beehive style spring?
Old 10-27-2006, 11:24 PM
  #20  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
ArcticZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 5,125
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Although they are slightly heavier, I believe the most of the power loss contributed to dual springs is the increase in energy needed to overcome the increased spring rates. I could be wrong though, just how I always thought about it.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:52 PM.