low numbers after h/c
#1
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: round rock, tx
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
low numbers after h/c
I just recently dyno tune after h/c, UD pulley and ls6 intake and got 412rwhp/360tq with afr 13. This is tune on a dynojet with EFI live, 28 degree timing. Base dyno with just LT was 330rwhp/320tq. These are PRC ls6 2.5 stg heads, TSP V2 cam (232/234). The car runs great but all this work and I gained 80hp and only 40tq (that's with pulley and ls6 intake). Please look at the graphs and tell me what is wrong. Thanks.
#5
Originally Posted by htvette
I used new stock head gaskets. The heads are not milled and came with double valve springs. I have 4.10 gears.
Tq curve looks good for the street. did you do 30lb injectors?
if the car runs strong, thats all that matters. peak dyno numbers is just a guage to show you how much power you car can put down at 6800rpm.
#7
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
The problem with not going back to the same dyno, is that no two read the same. From what I understand some of the new dynojets are reading lower numbers than older ones. Almost as bad as mustang dynos. Theres one by me that wont let me break 415 on. A few stock LS1s failed to get past ~280. Just one possibility.
Trending Topics
#9
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
Originally Posted by htvette
I used some cheap high flow cats and B&B catback exhaust. The baseline run was from another dynojet. What is the preferred timing for tuning?
#11
CARTEK Racing
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: East Brunswick, NJ
Posts: 2,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
28degrees might be too much timing. These are not old school motors, very efficient combustion chambers like those on the LSx motors do not require high timing advance. But then again, it would only show up in crap times at the track, on the dyno it's supposed to show higher HP. The torque numbers are unusually low though.
Honestly I would not worry about it. I would go to the track. If you trap 115MPH something is wrong. But if you see a 120MPH or so then you're alright.
Honestly I would not worry about it. I would go to the track. If you trap 115MPH something is wrong. But if you see a 120MPH or so then you're alright.
#12
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
Originally Posted by htvette
I spoke to TSP and they said this h/c setup usually nets a minimum of 380tq.
#13
TECH Addict
iTrader: (29)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Margate, FL
Posts: 2,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
a few things to consider here my friend, all is NOT lost!!! DO NOT think twice that you wasted your time...
Heads are heads, cams are cams, they WILL wake up your engine...sometimes howeverm unlocking that power is the trick...
First of all, like previously stated....
-4.10's rob HP and Tq
-IRS " " " "
-Dynos differ
-Cats, even though they are hi flo will cut HP as a lot of people who add performance parts !CATS (MOST not all)
-How free flowing is that cat back..remember, youve got A LOT more flow now..maybe its time to change that up a bit, let those headers do what they are designed to do...
-TUNE TUNE TUNE....I dont know who did your tune, but keep tweaking it...try different things like timing and all...see what it likes...you never know..
-And remeber, its the seat of your pants feeling of H/C that you worked hard for!
(this was all stated above, just wanted to lift spirits!)
Heads are heads, cams are cams, they WILL wake up your engine...sometimes howeverm unlocking that power is the trick...
First of all, like previously stated....
-4.10's rob HP and Tq
-IRS " " " "
-Dynos differ
-Cats, even though they are hi flo will cut HP as a lot of people who add performance parts !CATS (MOST not all)
-How free flowing is that cat back..remember, youve got A LOT more flow now..maybe its time to change that up a bit, let those headers do what they are designed to do...
-TUNE TUNE TUNE....I dont know who did your tune, but keep tweaking it...try different things like timing and all...see what it likes...you never know..
-And remeber, its the seat of your pants feeling of H/C that you worked hard for!
(this was all stated above, just wanted to lift spirits!)
#15
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
Originally Posted by htvette
I will try another dyno. Seems strange that another dyno will give high results.
I was expecting and told by TSP that this setup will get 430.
I was expecting and told by TSP that this setup will get 430.
#17
The torque numbers look low to me. I've got stock heads and injectors with no ud pulley and the 4:10 gears with a smaller cam. Not having the knowledge these fella's on here do, my only question would be if the cam was degreed. I originally made 356 rwtq before degreeing and then went to 382 afterwards.
#20
I think 80RWHP is pretty good for a h/c swap . You are only off 18 Hp from what TSP told you and you can't expect exact quotes . I would be happy with that and as other said try another dyno if you want a higher #