Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

improvement w/ aftermarket rocker arms?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-27-2006, 03:55 AM
  #1  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (24)
 
sidewayz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: seattle
Posts: 3,548
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default improvement w/ aftermarket rocker arms?

what kind of improvements do aftermarket RRs cause? right now im running the stockers w/ 7.4 TSP hardened push rods and patriot gold springs. My cam is the T2 from TSP 232/234 .595/.598 112 and im running untouched 243 heads as well as a 90/90 set up. what would be the difference between the
1.7:1 & 1.8:1 rockers? would i notice improvement in anything? and if i got new ones would it be necessary to get different length PRs? thanks in advance for helping out this valvetrain newbie
Old 12-27-2006, 06:40 AM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
vettenuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Little Rhody
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Some of the aftermarket rockers (like the Cranes I run) come with the pushrods as a kit because they are a different length (7.250"). One improvement I saw was a much better wipe pattern on the valve stem.
Old 12-27-2006, 10:24 AM
  #3  
Launching!
iTrader: (8)
 
camaro4me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the bigger the rocker the bigger your cam will think it is. You will def pick up some power
Old 12-27-2006, 06:24 PM
  #4  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (24)
 
sidewayz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: seattle
Posts: 3,548
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

could be way off here... but i heard aftermarket RRs will do something with the lift of the cam or something? so 1.8:1 would make an improvement over the stockers?
Old 12-27-2006, 07:34 PM
  #5  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
wavrdr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

1.8 will allow the cam to have more lift....

I "believe" the formula is: lift x new rocker ratio(1.8)/old rocker ratio(1.7)
Old 12-27-2006, 09:46 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
mvvette97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Leon Iowa
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Just make sure you don't go over the max lift of the springs
Old 12-27-2006, 10:16 PM
  #7  
Banned
 
Asmodeus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

putting 1.8's on an already agressive ramp rate can be a cause of valve float, valve bounce, and will shorten the life of your springs. If you go with 1.8's, stay with a small cam.
Old 12-27-2006, 10:17 PM
  #8  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (24)
 
sidewayz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: seattle
Posts: 3,548
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

how would 1.7:1s affect the valve spring life and what not? would there be any difference with going with new ones over the stockers?
Old 12-27-2006, 10:28 PM
  #9  
Banned
 
Asmodeus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

it wouldn't be different for spring life. alot of people have harland sharp rebuild their stock rockers, some buy aftermarket. the needle bearing seems to want to come loose on high mile stock rockers, otherwise, they are fine.
Old 12-27-2006, 10:46 PM
  #10  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (7)
 
The1N_only's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Belton, Texas
Posts: 764
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

mine quited down the valve train... thats about all
Old 12-28-2006, 09:02 AM
  #11  
Kleeborp the Moderator™
iTrader: (11)
 
MeentSS02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 10,317
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

The only real benefits I could see to going with a stock ratio, aftermarket rocker arm assembly would be:

Adjustability (provided the rocker is adjustable, because there are some roller rockers that aren't)
Less overall wear on the valves and guides (a big assumption on my part)

If it was a shaft mount setup, I'd think that it would also give a little more accurate accuation of the valves since flexing would be kept to a minimum. Then again, I've never had roller rockers, so these are only guesses.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:23 PM.