Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Valve timing vs. advertised duration

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-21-2007, 03:41 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
AJay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Morgantown, WV
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Valve timing vs. advertised duration

I have read Cam threads ad nausium regarding duration at .050 which everybody seems to use for defining how a cam will perform but why aren't people focusing on the actual Intake and Exhaust Valve opening and closing events? It seems to me that you could have two cams with a duration of....say...224/228 with different valve opening and closing event times which would perform completely different from one another.

So why is everybody using duration at .050 as the gospel?

Last edited by AJay; 02-21-2007 at 04:44 PM.
Old 02-21-2007, 04:26 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Ragtop 99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I refer to the timing at .006 as "advertised".

We actually do pay attention to seat to seat duration.

Comp lobes are the most common and so when you see people talking about an Xe, XER, or LSK lobes, the difference amoung lobes reflects lift & seat to seat duration for a given .05 duration.
Old 02-21-2007, 04:38 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Ryan02SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lake Anna, VA/ Fairmont, WV
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AJay
I have read Cam threads ad nausium regarding advertised duration at .050 which everybody seems to use for defining how a cam will perform but why aren't people focusing on the actual Intake and Exhaust Valve opening and closing events? It seems to me that you could have two cams with an advertised duration of....say...224/228 with different valve opening and closing event times which would perform completely different from one another.

So why is everybody using advertised duration as the gospel?
The .050 duration is the common spec all cams manufacturers agree upon. The advertised duration is not agreed upon and different companies use different numbers. Comp uses .006 where almost every other cam company use .004. Isky, Crane etc.. Using .006 makes the open and closing valve event look faster than the .004 number. If you compare the advertised numbers of a cam, just make sure they are both at .006 or both at .004.
Old 02-21-2007, 04:44 PM
  #4  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
AJay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Morgantown, WV
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I revised my original post to say what I ment to say

Thanks for the good input. I'm learning!!!
Old 02-21-2007, 06:30 PM
  #5  
JPH
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
JPH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 3,776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

don't forget duration reflects rpm range.



Quick Reply: Valve timing vs. advertised duration



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:12 PM.