137.1K miles-Compression reading results
#1
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SW Houston
Posts: 4,185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
137.1K miles-Compression reading results
How bout these for some compression readings:
Current mileage- 137.1K
1- 158psi
2- 168psi
3- 156psi
4- 169psi
5- 160psi
6- 165psi
7- 160psi
8- 164psi
I was suprised....not too shabby, what do ya'll think?
Mods:243 heads, 232/234 Cam, comp 918's
Current mileage- 137.1K
1- 158psi
2- 168psi
3- 156psi
4- 169psi
5- 160psi
6- 165psi
7- 160psi
8- 164psi
I was suprised....not too shabby, what do ya'll think?
Mods:243 heads, 232/234 Cam, comp 918's
Trending Topics
#10
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SW Houston
Posts: 4,185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
im also using a full synthetic 0-30 oil too. Im sure if i was using a thicker dino oil it would have made better compression...i would think the thicker oil would help the rings make a better seal.
#13
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (42)
your compression readings will be different than a stock #'s because of your cam and your mileage. you are with in 3-4% so you are good to go there as stated. bearings could possibly be a problem but if you have good oil pressure and keep oil changed on a regualar basis then id say go with it. FWIW i have a 148K almost and drive it like its stolen. she is starting to puff some oil on decel so i am assuming its rings cause i have new heads( less than 7k) on them so its not valve guide seals. good enough of a reason to do a 370
#14
Originally Posted by SUTTERERMAN85
your compression readings will be different than a stock #'s because of your cam and your mileage. you are with in 3-4% so you are good to go there as stated. bearings could possibly be a problem but if you have good oil pressure and keep oil changed on a regualar basis then id say go with it. FWIW i have a 148K almost and drive it like its stolen. she is starting to puff some oil on decel so i am assuming its rings cause i have new heads( less than 7k) on them so its not valve guide seals. good enough of a reason to do a 370
#16
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SW Houston
Posts: 4,185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SUTTERERMAN85
no PCV anymore thought that was the problem also. could be valve guides seals but doubt it the heads were brand new when iput them on. i would say its the oil ring letting it get by. the new motor should fix this problem
you should jump on that deal now b4 someone else does.
#18
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Burton, MI
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
my car was makin some nice compression as well, i have 140k on it..and when i took my heads off the cylnder walls still had a nice 60* cross hatch and not to much of a piston ridge.
#20
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SW Houston
Posts: 4,185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So i take it if im not burning any oil, and getting good compression, I have the green light to buy some nice flowing heads instead of a new shortblock.
Not burning oil=bearings are in decent shape
good compression=good effciency(sp?)
I change my oil every 2K miles, and up keep my fluids and buy nothing but the best fluids, etc.
I guess im ready for some nice heads, and tires...what do yall think?
Not burning oil=bearings are in decent shape
good compression=good effciency(sp?)
I change my oil every 2K miles, and up keep my fluids and buy nothing but the best fluids, etc.
I guess im ready for some nice heads, and tires...what do yall think?