Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

***power Limit Of Stock Block***

Old 05-06-2007, 06:51 AM
  #1  
9 Second Truck Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
stock48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Posts: 3,672
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default ***power Limit Of Stock Block***

What is the approx power limit of the stock aluminum LS1 block? It's going to be turbo charged, and I don't want the extra weight up front of the iron truck block. I wan't to make around 1000 flywheel HP. THANKS, J
Old 05-06-2007, 07:21 AM
  #2  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (20)
 
deeloc1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Based on what people have said on this site...a stock block with a stock rotating assembly will hold up to about 600rwhp. i'm sure if you replace the stock rods for billet ones, add some arp bolts, and better pistons...you might be able to achieve your goal or at least something pretty close to it! people always talk about the aluminum block not being able to hold up, but i haven't heard of anybody breaking one yet...why don't you try it and let us know. Look at this great article...it's not turbo, but it is forced induction. He's running near 1,000 flywheel horse power. the article says 830rwhp, but when take aeay that moser 12-bolt and that TH400 trans, he should be making 900 and some change with that stock crank. http://www.gmhightechperformance.com...ro_ss_feature/
Old 05-06-2007, 07:38 AM
  #3  
9 Second Truck Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
stock48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Posts: 3,672
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by deeloc1
Based on what people have said on this site...a stock block with a stock rotating assembly will hold up to about 600rwhp. i'm sure if you replace the stock rods for billet ones, add some arp bolts, and better pistons...you might be able to achieve your goal or at least something pretty close to it! people always talk about the aluminum block not being able to hold up, but i haven't heard of anybody breaking one yet...why don't you try it and let us know. Look at this great article...it's not turbo, but it is forced induction. He's running near 1,000 flywheel horse power. the article says 830rwhp, but when take aeay that moser 12-bolt and that TH400 trans, he should be making 900 and some change with that stock crank. http://www.gmhightechperformance.com...ro_ss_feature/
Thanks! That is similer to what I want to do. I think a turbo is alittle easier on the block& crank than a supercharger. I will have good rods & pistons mated with the stock crank. 8.5:1 with 20-25psi. I have seen GEN 1 small blocks live for a short time with a similer setup, but the LS1 block looks alot stronger to me.
Old 05-06-2007, 07:43 AM
  #4  
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
davered00ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Plainfield, CT
Posts: 10,520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

PM 8ALTNG He did a 5.3l with a turbo and a lot of power. Just changed over to a 408 iron block turbo & aver 1000rwhp.
Old 05-06-2007, 09:51 AM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Benjamin Russick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I think with that kind of boost the limiting factor will be clamping force on the heads to the block. I'm no expert on boost, but my stock bottom-end H/C/N engine lasted a few years at 576rwhp/590rwtq before pushing a head-gasket.


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:02 PM.