View Poll Results: which one
F13-112(non high lift)
38
53.52%
Torquer v.2-112
33
46.48%
Voters: 71. You may not vote on this poll
F13-112(non high lift) vs Torquer v.2-112
05-20-2007, 08:55 PM
#1
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
F13-112(non high lift) vs Torquer v.2-112 whos running these cams, I am trying to decide between the 2. I want the cam that has a flatter torque curve. Can you guys chime in and help me out, thanks
05-20-2007, 09:53 PM
#2
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Western New York
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I vote F-13, I had the F-13 in my camaro, And my buddy has the Torquer v2 in his. We ran a few times and we were door to door the whole race. His put out better numbers on the dyno but numbers dont mean everything. Not to mention his is a way better driver than me.
05-22-2007, 11:54 AM
#5
11 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Your girl's back door giving her the long stroke while you're at work
Posts: 6,801
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
I had the F13 on a 114 in my old pewter Z. The mods were lid, F13, 3000 stall, Long Tubes and True duals and the car went 11.87 @ 113 on Nittos with 2.73 gears. The car dyno'd 381 HP and 391 TQ. It was a great daily driver cam and it loved a 150 shot
Last edited by Z28/2002; 05-22-2007 at 05:28 PM.
05-22-2007, 11:57 AM
#6
Ive had both in my motor, although the f-13 was cam only, and the T2 had heads with it. The T2 si slightly bigger while maintining good drivability. No reason not to go with the bigger one.
I also lost two sets of lifters during the bad batch of f13 cams. Futral took care of me and replaced my cam, but after pulling the heads twice, I didnt have the will to tempt fate again. The new futral cams are different cores and hopefully all the bugs have been wored out, dont dont let their bad batch influence you too much.
I also lost two sets of lifters during the bad batch of f13 cams. Futral took care of me and replaced my cam, but after pulling the heads twice, I didnt have the will to tempt fate again. The new futral cams are different cores and hopefully all the bugs have been wored out, dont dont let their bad batch influence you too much.
Trending Topics
05-23-2007, 05:19 AM
#9
14 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 2,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've got a F13 on a 114 in 383 LS1. I've got a dyno chart on my picturetrail link. Keep in mind this is through the truck intake, it's got some more in it with a LS6 intake swap and ASP crank pulley. I love this cam, awesome power from idle to 6200. If I had a camaro or trans am I buy another one!
05-24-2007, 12:04 PM
#11
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BES Stroked Nova
my buddy as a V2 with almost the same bolt ons as me, becides pulleys and i have a F11 on 114 and still made more power under the curve, and his only peaked 5hp over my 405whp 395rtq. ohh and cant beat the way a F cam hits....
11-26-2008, 11:55 AM
#13
I have the regular F13-112+2 and couldn't be happier. I have seen 1 or 2 people at the track with the Torquer v.2 cam but don't know if it on a 112 or not. It seemed like to be pretty good cam from what I seen at the track times are very close but I didn't ask what it dynoed. Wish I still had my dyno sheet but I can't find it from my moving, wish I could help on that.
Last edited by Evans752; 11-26-2008 at 02:25 PM.
11-26-2008, 11:16 PM
#15
10 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tennessee Tech
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'll have to post up my chart when i get home but i've got the torquer v2 (clone) 112+2, its a comp on XER lobes. it had some nice under the curve power for a bolt on car. Cam only it went 11.9 @ 115 (7.70 @ 92 1/8), with a 3600 yank, and a 10.6 @ 129 (6.8 @ 102) with the 150 jets. it made 380 rwhp, and 355 ftlbs. Prob. could have made more torque if i didn't go with -4cc valve relief pistons on stock heads.
12-03-2008, 10:00 AM
#17
I voted for the F13, but both are good cams.
My car went 12.089 @ 114.79 on a 3700' race weight in 1400' DA. Mind you, it is in an LQ4. Here is my dyno chart with a link to my track results:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...ly-44rwhp.html
My car went 12.089 @ 114.79 on a 3700' race weight in 1400' DA. Mind you, it is in an LQ4. Here is my dyno chart with a link to my track results:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...ly-44rwhp.html
12-09-2008, 09:27 PM
#18
Staging Lane
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: bel air, md
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Torquer 2 on a 112lsa here. I got the 5.3 heads too though. I gotta look for the graph but it peaked pretty low in the rpm range which i was happy about. Redline set at 6500 rpm and 415 hp at about 6200-6300 rpms. torque was 389 and the curve was pretty nice and flat but nothing like my old asa cam. This was on a mustang dyno with ls6 intake stock pulley and throttle body. No track times...yet
12-10-2008, 09:21 PM
#20
Search the "El Torro" cam. It beats them both under the curve and peaks just as well. 230/230 .612/.592 111 + 2 XFI/X-ER lobes This is a Pred-Z spec grind and has made killer #'s. Search Chrs1313 for proof. I have a "cousin grind and off idle to 6500 it pulls like h*ll.