Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: AFR 205's or PRC 220 5.3L stage 2.5
AFR's
51
73.91%
PRC's
18
26.09%
Voters: 69. You may not vote on this poll

AFR 205's or PRC 220cc 5.3L stage 2.5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-06-2007, 10:51 AM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
SSilver Bullet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Avondale/Tolleson, AZ
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question AFR 205's or PRC 220cc 5.3L stage 2.5

Just curious what you guys think. My friend has an MS3 on 111LSA he's going to sell to me for a good price and was wondering which heads I should get and why. And I do believe that the MS3 will work with the AFR's without any additional work? The PRC's will fit without additional work. Well I've been reading a little bit about both heads and hear great things about them. Which heads do you think I would see more of a gain?
Old 08-06-2007, 01:22 PM
  #2  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Bad Blu Formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 3,585
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Internal section?
Old 08-06-2007, 01:46 PM
  #3  
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,244
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Moved from External Section.

Both heads are excellent. Just remember to get the highest static compression you can run with your avaible fuel. Compression will give you lots more torque. More torque means more hp.
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
Old 08-06-2007, 06:46 PM
  #4  
Launching!
 
gts500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

AFR for chure
Old 08-06-2007, 09:07 PM
  #5  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
 
teke184's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Key West, Florida
Posts: 3,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

downside of the AFRs is that they have a near stock compression (unmilled).

the 5.3s should boost compression a bit.

like patrick said...its all about compression for your available fuel.


my vote...5.3s

particularly for the ms3...the cam could use the better flow of the 220 runner...without being an overkill
Old 08-07-2007, 02:21 AM
  #6  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
SSilver Bullet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Avondale/Tolleson, AZ
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for all the input guys. The 5.3's will raise my compression to 10.75, what other things could I do to raise compression without having to spend a lot of $? And also I understand the ms3 is a big top end cam, if I dont like the results with the low end power i may switch cam's. Im atleast shooting for 460-470 to the wheels and I think the ms3/PRC combo would get me there but I'm also planning on a ported fast 90/90. I was thinking of a smaller cam and the fast 90/90 would keep me in the 460-470rwhp range. What do ya think?
Old 08-07-2007, 07:02 AM
  #7  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
z28poweredlt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Burbank, SoCal
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I made 460 to the tire with the stage 1 prc ls6 heads.... Why go 5.3's? I'm running and MS3 also on an ls6 intake without an elec water pump... So 475-480 shouldn't be to far out of my reach on this 95k motor.
Old 08-07-2007, 07:04 PM
  #8  
Banned
iTrader: (115)
 
99blancoSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: ST Helens, OR
Posts: 9,892
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by teke184
downside of the AFRs is that they have a near stock compression (unmilled).

the 5.3s should boost compression a bit.

like patrick said...its all about compression for your available fuel.


my vote...5.3s

particularly for the ms3...the cam could use the better flow of the 220 runner...without being an overkill
there is no downside to AFR's. You want more compression you mill them. The AFR's are a step above.

Its a money issue here really. If you've got the coin for the AFR's then buy them. You can still get a good deal on them at Texas Speed so it's not big deal here. The AFR is the better head.

Last edited by 99blancoSS; 08-07-2007 at 08:20 PM.
Old 08-20-2007, 10:55 PM
  #9  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
red_ryderSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

sounds like u have the cash, with the ported 90/90, milled afr heads for sure u would get to your goal. check my combo in my sig, decent power, unmilled heads and unported fast 90 nw tb.
Old 08-21-2007, 12:15 AM
  #10  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
chae's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 964
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Don't forget about Patriot Performance CNC ported cylinder heads for the LSX engines.

By the way this is a topic beaten to death on this forum. It gets asked almost weekly
Old 08-21-2007, 08:39 AM
  #11  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
N4cer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ashland, KY
Posts: 2,526
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

You're comparing a pickup truck to a Z06. The PRC 2.5s will do the job well, with good power, and get the job done. But the AFRs will blow them away.
Old 08-21-2007, 11:38 AM
  #12  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (28)
 
gnx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,453
Received 149 Likes on 96 Posts

Default

If you have the $$$. Get the AFR's and mill them. You will not be dissappointed. They will flow better in the low/mid range than any stock casting and perform great in the upper RPM/lift range as well. They have a thicker deck if you decide to run nitrous also.

I'd look at the TrickFlow castings as well. They have been putting up good numbers just like the others.
Old 08-21-2007, 07:39 PM
  #13  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
chae's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 964
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you have the cash pick up a set from Air Flow Research or ET Performance.

Otherwise Dart, Patriot, Livernois, etc. are good budget choices.
Old 08-21-2007, 09:53 PM
  #14  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (9)
 
mcamarols1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 989
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

get the trickflow 215 heads
Old 08-22-2007, 12:09 AM
  #15  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
chae's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 964
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mcamarols1
get the trickflow 215 heads
I've heard of better results with the AFR's or ETP's. For that kind of money you might as well step up to the best. There seems to be some "hype" on this forum about the trickflow heads, but for $2000+ why not go with what has been proven to perform (AFR or ETP).
Old 08-22-2007, 12:19 AM
  #16  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (11)
 
ThirdGenLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

its what ever fits into your budget the best. If the extra 1k dollars doesnt hurt you at all then look at the edlebrock, afr, etp, etc heads. If that hurts the wallet to much then look at the ported stockers/dart heads.

The top dollar heads are nice, but if its the difference between you being able to buy out right with money in hand, and putting it on the credit card then i dont think its worth it. the extra hp isn't worth being in debt.

Just my thoughts
Old 08-31-2007, 12:32 AM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
 
Tram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Florence, Al
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

How much extra HP are we talking with AFR's over something like some PRC 5.3's?

Are we talking 20-30 or more?
Old 08-31-2007, 09:25 AM
  #18  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
 
teke184's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Key West, Florida
Posts: 3,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i would think unless you mill the AFRs...the increased compression of the 5.3s would yield the same if not higher power.

the AFRs may get a bit more down low with the smaller runner, but a 220cc runner is not bad for that size cam.
Old 08-31-2007, 09:26 AM
  #19  
Banned
iTrader: (115)
 
99blancoSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: ST Helens, OR
Posts: 9,892
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

It all depends on your setup and if you mill the heads. The 5.3's are a good inexpensive way to go. You can raise your compression without milling them. If you've got the money then you go with AFR's and have Tony work them over a bit. My guess is that there might be a 10-20 hp difference.

I've got a new setup that I need to get tuned and then I can provide some real world data on TSP heads vs AFR.
Old 08-31-2007, 01:05 PM
  #20  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
N4cer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ashland, KY
Posts: 2,526
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

They may provide a close peak hp, but I'll bet the AFR's have a much better torque curve.

I can't wait to see what Blanco's car does. I hope it makes up for the kick in the nuts that the termy heads were.


Quick Reply: AFR 205's or PRC 220cc 5.3L stage 2.5



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:00 AM.