Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

cam choice 231/237 or MS3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-28-2008, 06:18 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
'02SOMz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Amarillo, Tx
Posts: 1,133
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default cam choice 231/237 or MS3

I am planning on ordering a tsp 231/237 cam next week, but i also like the tsp Magic Stick 3 Cam. Im a daily driver. Does anybody know about the drive_ability of this cam, and dyno numbers??
Old 01-28-2008, 06:38 PM
  #2  
On The Tree
iTrader: (14)
 
StangSlayerSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I had the 233/239 made 5 less hp then a buddies ms3 with same mods on same dyno and tuner. This cam drives awesome, may want to consider this one I put down 410rwhp thru kooks, cut out ,12bolt, fast 78, and pulley
Old 02-02-2008, 05:58 AM
  #3  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (37)
 
Gun5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Tomball (H-Town), TX
Posts: 2,714
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by StangSlayerSS
I had the 233/239 made 5 less hp then a buddies ms3 with same mods on same dyno and tuner. This cam drives awesome, may want to consider this one I put down 410rwhp thru kooks, cut out ,12bolt, fast 78, and pulley
damn what else u got just cam only?? think the 231/237 can get over 400 with just full bolt ons?
Old 02-02-2008, 06:15 AM
  #4  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
ls1leadfoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Greenwood, IN
Posts: 894
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

i would do the 231/237 for daily driver/driveability........

my ms3 is pretty choppy and in a m6 it doesnt make power to get moving till about 2300-2500 rpm

with either cam you get good numbers.....ms3 would be nice with some n20
Old 02-02-2008, 08:27 AM
  #5  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
NHRAFORMULA00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Manteno,illinois
Posts: 1,629
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

231/237...leave the ms3 for track only cars...
Old 02-02-2008, 12:00 PM
  #6  
Banned Village Idiot
iTrader: (36)
 
LS1BLKSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Anaheim,CA
Posts: 2,551
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by StangSlayerSS
I had the 233/239 made 5 less hp then a buddies ms3 with same mods on same dyno and tuner. This cam drives awesome, may want to consider this one I put down 410rwhp thru kooks, cut out ,12bolt, fast 78, and pulley
i was going to get this cam as well... 233/239... and thats a pretty good number you got!!!
Old 02-02-2008, 01:09 PM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
TXZ28LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Classified
Posts: 6,164
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

both those cams can be for daily drivers. i would say go with the 231/237. i think there was a guy that made sick power with some prc 5.3 heads and that cam.
Old 02-02-2008, 02:05 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
GMmexican's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

231/237 cam on a 114lsa would be great with nitrous
Old 02-03-2008, 11:45 AM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (73)
 
'02 WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NHRAFORMULA00
231/237...leave the ms3 for track only cars...
x2 231/237 get's my vote
Old 02-03-2008, 03:08 PM
  #10  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (53)
 
geovett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: So.Ca.(I.E.)
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

i'm going with the MS3 why cut threw the chase, hey why settle for less, add some juice later and run for some money....on the street, track, alleys, where ever..............lol....

ported heads
4.10's
and more goodies.....stk susp..for now....(thats not good)
tci 3600 stally
stang beater.....
Old 02-03-2008, 03:22 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (73)
 
'02 WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

i don't know of too many people that would consider a SI5 - 231/237 "settling for less than a ms3"
Old 02-03-2008, 08:59 PM
  #12  
On The Tree
 
91_RS_LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northeast TN
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by '02 Double U S-6
i don't know of too many people that would consider a SI5 - 231/237 "settling for less than a ms3"
Cause it's not as 'big' a came and the peak numbers are off by 5-15. Then again, I'm looking at the Torqer V.2
Old 02-03-2008, 10:21 PM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
'02SOMz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Amarillo, Tx
Posts: 1,133
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by geovett
i'm going with the MS3 why cut threw the chase, hey why settle for less, add some juice later and run for some money....on the street, track, alleys, where ever..............lol....

ported heads
4.10's
and more goodies.....stk susp..for now....(thats not good)
tci 3600 stally
stang beater.....
Thanks for the input!! and geovett ms3's are not the best. i have seen Torqer2 and the 231/237 dyno more and beat other ls1's with the ms3's but yes it still is a good cam.....
Old 02-03-2008, 10:42 PM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (77)
 
01 BERGER CAMARO SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 2 Miles from the Brder Wall, Tx
Posts: 718
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have an MS3 in my car with stock stall & gears and drives fine. A friend of mine tuned it with the wide-band. Drivability is great, i guess i really comes down to who tunes ur car and parts installer.
Old 02-03-2008, 11:28 PM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (73)
 
'02 WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 91_RS_LS1
Cause it's not as 'big' a came and the peak numbers are off by 5-15. Then again, I'm looking at the Torqer V.2
i would consider "settling" more like -30hp under ms3. 5-15, you can make that up in a lauch, shift, etc. nothing to consider a "downgrade". and the ms3 has been called a dog in down low rpms by many enthusiasts on here and more of a "peak" cam, as opposed to the power distributed evenly through the curve and wakes up earlier down low than an ms3, si5 - 231/237
Old 02-04-2008, 02:38 AM
  #16  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (8)
 
99TransAmLS16Spd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Morris, IL
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have the ms4, I'm not gonna unfairly compare it against other cams, as many others make awesome numbers as well. What I will tell you is that so much is in the tune. My ms4 is perfectly streetable in my m6 from 1,500rpm +. But it doesn't really hit the powerband until 4k when it takes off like a bat outta hell. It works for me because the engine only see's less than 4k rpm for a split second while launching.

Just remember, choosing a cam also includes choosing the right supporting mods. A 224 cam and ms3 may make similar #s on stock heads and ls6 intake. But a set of AFRs and a FAST 90 would put the ms3 way ahead.
Old 02-04-2008, 10:11 AM
  #17  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
KONG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by '02SOMz28
I am planning on ordering a tsp 231/237 cam next week, but i also like the tsp Magic Stick 3 Cam. Im a daily driver. Does anybody know about the drive_ability of this cam, and dyno numbers??
Neither cam, both aren't that great. Do a custom grind for your application that way there will no disappointments. Good luck..
Old 02-04-2008, 12:47 PM
  #18  
On The Tree
 
91_RS_LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northeast TN
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by '02 Double U S-6
i would consider "settling" more like -30hp under ms3. 5-15, you can make that up in a lauch, shift, etc. nothing to consider a "downgrade". and the ms3 has been called a dog in down low rpms by many enthusiasts on here and more of a "peak" cam, as opposed to the power distributed evenly through the curve and wakes up earlier down low than an ms3, si5 - 231/237
I didn't realize that there was that much of a difference in peak. I've not seen that much, but I've seen a whole lot of dynos. I'd rather have the more even distribution than having the engine not wake up until the high RPM range. Probably cause my car isn't a drag car, as you can probably gather from my mods list...heh. But that's personal preference without testing. I need to ride/drive in a car with both MS3/MS4 type cams and the lower duration cams made to pull more evenly.
Old 02-04-2008, 06:34 PM
  #19  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (73)
 
'02 WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by KONG
Neither cam, both aren't that great. Do a custom grind for your application that way there will no disappointments. Good luck..


how can you say that neither are that great when a great number of people ask what cam.... torquer 2, 231/237, ms3, 228, tr224, f14,?? they both are some of the most proven cams out there and have a fair consistency of putting out over 400hp cam only. while i admit that patrick g's custom grinds are unsurpassed, there are many kick *** over the counter cams that can perform just as well, as long as you do your research.
Old 02-04-2008, 06:38 PM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (73)
 
'02 WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 91_RS_LS1
I didn't realize that there was that much of a difference in peak. I've not seen that much, but I've seen a whole lot of dynos. I'd rather have the more even distribution than having the engine not wake up until the high RPM range. Probably cause my car isn't a drag car, as you can probably gather from my mods list...heh. But that's personal preference without testing. I need to ride/drive in a car with both MS3/MS4 type cams and the lower duration cams made to pull more evenly.
well when paired w/ supporting mods (afr's, fast 90/90, EWP) the ms3's peak numbers will be bigger, but it pulls up to 7000k+ rpms and some don't want to pull it that high to make that power.

i agree with you in the even distribution of power through the whole rpm range which is why i voted for the 231/237.

nice 3rd gen btw!


Quick Reply: cam choice 231/237 or MS3



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:35 AM.