Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Aliminum Block Vs. Iron Block

Old 07-12-2003, 03:09 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
MUSTANGEATER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Belleville, IL
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Aliminum Block Vs. Iron Block

I've tried to use search to find some of these answers but haven't had much luck so far.

What are the pro's and con's of using each type of block for a bigger cube application?

Can the aliminum block handle big shots (300 and up) of Nitrous?

Does the Iron block bolt right up in an ls1 f-body?

Non block related question here but..

What's the max compression I can run on 93 octane (natrually aspirtated of course)


Thanks for all the help

Floyd
Old 07-12-2003, 03:15 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
DONAIMIAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NW Houston, TX
Posts: 10,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: Aliminum Block Vs. Iron Block

You can get more cubes out of an iorn block without re-sleving it. But the iorn block is gona be heavier. The iorn block can take more abuse than the aluminum block, but you cant run as much compression with the iorn block without using race gas. The Iorn block does bolt right up to the LS1

Old 07-12-2003, 03:25 PM
  #3  
TECH Regular
 
Liquidnutz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Fort Gordon, GA
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Aliminum Block Vs. Iron Block

1. YES Aluminum can handle BIG SHOTS, take the fellas at ARE for example. More expensive route to go but you can get more cubes that way.

2. I have heard mixed emotions on this one so I cant be sure. Engine components bolt up fine, the accessories are a tad bit tricky from what I have heard, I am no expert on that part though so dont take what I say on that as gospel.


Compression, I run 11:7:1 currently with no problems

Hope this helps a little
Old 07-12-2003, 03:48 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
 
Smoke_Ford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bloomington, IN
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Aliminum Block Vs. Iron Block

Keep in mind the iron block does not dissipate heat nearly as fast.
Old 07-12-2003, 04:25 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
strokedls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Venice, Ca
Posts: 1,829
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Aliminum Block Vs. Iron Block

Iron block adds on about 90 lbs, but can handle the abuse of a big shot, turbo, or supercharger. The darton resleeved is a little more than twice the cost after machine work fees, but it is lighter and can handle a big shot also. Depends on how much you have to spend. I am finishing up a iron 422 right now, and changed k-member and deleted AC to make up the weight difference.
Old 07-12-2003, 05:06 PM
  #6  
7 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
10.5 Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Grove City Ohio/Port Washington L.I sometimes
Posts: 2,064
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Aliminum Block Vs. Iron Block

This has been discussed quite a bit.The only positive of the iron block is cost.The alum block when properly prepped can take very large shots and high boost.The fastest LS1 based setups are running alum blocks.Keep in mind if adding a blower or turbo with an iron block,you will have 150-175 extra lbs up front.The iron blocks tend to overheat much easier than alum.
Old 07-12-2003, 05:56 PM
  #7  
Shorty Director
iTrader: (1)
 
VINCE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Valrico, Florida
Posts: 8,260
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default Re: Aliminum Block Vs. Iron Block

I would go alum. I could not imagine adding another 90lbs to my 3800lb raceweight.. Not too mention I am going boost next. So I would be 4klbs b4 you know it.. Even with weight reduction I would have to take a lot out just to get down to 3600lbs with a iron block.. The lighter car making the same power as the heavier car is going to win every time with all other things being equal..
Old 07-13-2003, 04:50 AM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
MUSTANGEATER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Belleville, IL
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Re: Aliminum Block Vs. Iron Block

Thanks for the help guys I appreciate it. If the aliminum block is capable of handling the big huge shots and weighs less I see no reason for not going with it.

Looks like I'll start to build my 388 All bore pretty soon
Old 07-29-2003, 02:03 PM
  #9  
Launching!
 
extremecorvette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Iowa
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: Aliminum Block Vs. Iron Block

I have a block for sell that comes honed, new hardened Dura-Bond cam bearings, and new ARP main studs. Some people think the dry sleeves are better than the wet sleeves. I called Darton who makes the dry sleeves for Agostino racing and the wet sleeves. The tec said the wet sleeves are far better and can take more abuse, and that the dry sleeves are milled very thin to get a 4.125" bore. He said Darton has been using wet sleeves for years in motors that make over 1000 hp with out any problems. Also with the wet sleeves you get better heat transfer. Morgan Machine Shop are setting the motor up for me. Naturally aspirated cars with 427 CI are running the ¼ mile the low to mid 10's, with NOS there hitting the mid to hi 9's. I would be willing to go 3000 shipped. I would be willing to go 3000 shipped. You can email me at NRKnause@midamerican.com


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:40 AM.