Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

1.8 Roller Rockers with 232-234 cam yay or nay?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-17-2008, 12:31 AM
  #1  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
ls1chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: kentucky
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default 1.8 Roller Rockers with 232-234 cam yay or nay?

Hey guys im looking to add a little more power to the car and have been looking into maybe getting a set of these to install on my car .But im Curious as would this be a good addition or not for my setup,Running a 232-234 .595 .598 cam on a 112 lsa.



i have full exhaust ,cam ,intake,pptb, so would i be able to see any advantage with them over my stockers on my setup or would they be un needed. So share some info with me guys,Cause i was thinking on switching to a bigger cam later but if this will provide soem extra hp i may keep the torquer v2.
Old 03-17-2008, 12:49 AM
  #2  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
bottlefed98's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Grand bay, AL
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ive heard it said that they arent recomended with that big of a cam..
Old 03-17-2008, 12:54 AM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
 
2QUIK4U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Chesterfield,Va
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was looking into getting some roller rockers also but I did alot of research and most of the results Ive seen dont show any increase in power with roller rockers.
Old 03-17-2008, 01:03 AM
  #4  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
ls1chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: kentucky
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

yes that what i had heard also was with the size of cam i have they wouldnt really be a worth while mod,Just thaugh i would try to find out from some more informed guys than myself,Guess i need to look elswere for a good 10-15 hp bump
Old 03-17-2008, 01:51 AM
  #5  
Banned
iTrader: (8)
 
ae13291's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: san fernando valley, california
Posts: 3,093
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

yea the stock rockers are good enough! or upgraded 1.7 rockers
Old 03-17-2008, 03:19 AM
  #6  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (33)
 
LS1-450's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,783
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

The 1.8's would bump your lift to .630/.633. Most likely won't achieve any more gains, as you already have more than adequate valve lift. 1.8's do more to benefit guys like me w/ .525/.532 lift prior to 1.8's & .556/.563 after; still not as much as yours on 1.7's.

+1 on the going to 1.7 roller rockers. Especially, if you modify the assembly to an adjustable rocker set up. There will be less valve guide loading & consistent lifter pre-load from valve to valve.
Old 03-17-2008, 07:24 AM
  #7  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
slow trap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: tennessee
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

also the 1.8 ratio with those xer lobes would be pretty hard on your springs. maybe save for a used fast 90/90 or new 92/92 setup.
Old 03-17-2008, 11:13 AM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
xBROKEx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pflugerville
Posts: 1,356
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

i wouldnt
Old 03-17-2008, 11:28 AM
  #9  
LS1TECH & Trucks Sponsor
iTrader: (34)
 
Scoggin Dickey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 3,524
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 21 Posts

Default

I would highly recommend against it.
__________________

800-456-0211 / PM / Facebook
WHIPPLE Superchargers, Procharger, Magnuson, Powerbond Sale, HPTuners packages!, Trickflow, AFR, PRC, CHE Trunion upgrade, $100 7.400" pushrod set, Custom Cam of your choice


Old 03-17-2008, 11:47 AM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
JScamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 1,381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What if you used a less aggressive lobe like Thunder racing lobes or comp xe? Could 1.8 rockers be used, say if you want higher lift but not such aggressive lobes for a daily driver.
Old 03-17-2008, 01:34 PM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
slow trap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: tennessee
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JScamaro
What if you used a less aggressive lobe like Thunder racing lobes or comp xe? Could 1.8 rockers be used, say if you want higher lift but not such aggressive lobes for a daily driver.
you could but in reality i would think an xe lobe with 1.8 rockers would be just as hard on parts as say an xer lobe with 1.7s. the more agressive lobes like xfi or even lsk lobes a decent spring should still last quite a while but for dd i personally wouldn't but i'm sure alot do.
Old 03-17-2008, 03:06 PM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

It is not the issue of hard on parts, it is the issue of lobe rate (too steep).
And BTW lobe rate of TR is like 50 and XE-R 49 so TR lobes are not that much "softer".
XE is 53.



Quick Reply: 1.8 Roller Rockers with 232-234 cam yay or nay?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:29 AM.