Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

dont get it.. afr205's vs. tsp st2.5-5.3's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-18-2008, 05:54 PM
  #1  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
deuce_454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default dont get it.. afr205's vs. tsp st2.5-5.3's

I dont get all this fuzz about AFR heads.. when you compare the advertised flow numbers for a set op TSP/PRC stage 2.5 5.3 heads

.300 208
.400 257
.500 290
.600 312

and a set of AFR 205.s

.200 140
.300 200
.400 261
.500 281
.550 292
.600 298

I just dont see the big difference.. are the AFR,s worth the extra 80% (plus springs) over the TSP/PRC heads?? i mean for that extra cash you could buy a fast 92/92 combo...

having Patrick G spec me a cam that propably ends up in the "torque cam" teritory... and the gar will see hard street and autocross time.. no drag strip..
Old 03-18-2008, 06:02 PM
  #2  
Jedi Master
iTrader: (3)
 
Gh0st's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: MN
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There's more to a head than ADVERTISED flow numbers
Old 03-18-2008, 06:04 PM
  #3  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (37)
 
Gun5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Tomball (H-Town), TX
Posts: 2,714
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

ya the 205's are a way better head.. from design stand point alot more meat can be ported out to.. those 5.3's are maxed out... but then look at the price
Old 03-18-2008, 06:35 PM
  #4  
Launching!
iTrader: (24)
 
kistlerjm9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: pittsburgh pa
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

compare the port size tsp 5.3's 220 range and the afr's 205's. better velocity and all around better design. dont get me wrong tsp has some of the best heads for the buck. but etp and afr have taken it a step above and beyond.
Old 03-18-2008, 07:39 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (23)
 
99zman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

from what i see on here, if you want a peak hp # ported stockers are ok, the tq# are not to impressive. if you want power under the curve and some good Tq# aftermarket castings are much better not to mention quality.
Old 03-18-2008, 07:45 PM
  #6  
TECH Junkie
 
1989GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,092
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

I agree with the above posts. You mention the AFR's are 205cc. What are the size of the other heads after porting.

No knock on the TSP heads but remember a sewer pipe will flow a lot of air.
Old 03-18-2008, 07:46 PM
  #7  
TECH Junkie
 
1989GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,092
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

I agree with the above posts. You mention the AFR's are 205cc. What are the size of the other heads after porting?

No knock on the TSP heads but remember a sewer pipe will flow a lot of air.
Old 03-19-2008, 12:53 AM
  #8  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
deuce_454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

its just that the cam im looking to install is over .600 lift, that puts the afr´s at 2800 bucks with springs... the 5.3's are 1200.... thats a big difference, and will i get more for my buck buying a fast 92/92, than sticking with my ls6-IM and going with the afr's ?????
Old 03-19-2008, 04:22 AM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Gh0st
There's more to a head than ADVERTISED flow numbers
Amen to that, that sums it up pretty well. If you have the $$, take the blue pill and don't look back.
Old 03-19-2008, 07:39 AM
  #10  
TECH Enthusiast
 
blu1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

AFR, ETP and TFS will always outperform ported stock castings. Will the stock castings stay close on a flow bench? Sure, but your car doesn't race on a flow bench.
And Im not biased as I run a ported stock casting head myself, because for the money they are unbeatable if you are looking for a nice setup on a budget.
Old 03-19-2008, 07:49 AM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
JScamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 1,381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by deuce_454
its just that the cam im looking to install is over .600 lift, that puts the afr´s at 2800 bucks with springs... the 5.3's are 1200.... thats a big difference, and will i get more for my buck buying a fast 92/92, than sticking with my ls6-IM and going with the afr's ?????
I've seen the AFR's being sold for $2185 with dual springs.
Old 03-19-2008, 07:53 AM
  #12  
On The Tree
iTrader: (8)
 
mesospeedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

My TEA stg. 2 243's flow the same as 215 TFS, but I've seen several combos with similar or smaller cams than what I have make a few more horses and alot more torque!
Old 03-19-2008, 08:07 AM
  #13  
TECH Regular
 
ExTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Westampton, NJ
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

All i can say is you get what you pay for, nothing more. 5.3's have put down some good power and alot of guys go pretty fast with them with the right setup. If your looking for a seriously fast street/strip car the AFR's are the way to go. Id say they're good for at least a tenth and one or two MPH over the 5.3's. A ported fast 90 combo will even the playing field a bit with the 5.3's but save for the AFR's then put a fast on them later and you wont regret it.
Old 03-19-2008, 08:20 AM
  #14  
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,244
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

I am a big fan of buying the best cylinder head you can afford and use that as a foundation for future mods. Having said that, if your budget only allows, say $2500, then you'll make the most power with the more affordable heads and a FAST 92/92. Problem is, when you get some more money in the future, it will be more expensive to gain power after that because your foundation is not as stout as it would be with the aftermarket heads. I must say though, that I have been impressed with the numbers that the latest PRC 5.3L heads have been putting down. The heads continue to be improved over time.
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
Old 03-19-2008, 08:36 AM
  #15  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Stang's Bane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mont Belvieu, TX
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by blu1
AFR, ETP and TFS will always outperform ported stock castings. Will the stock castings stay close on a flow bench? Sure, but your car doesn't race on a flow bench.
And Im not biased as I run a ported stock casting head myself, because for the money they are unbeatable if you are looking for a nice setup on a budget.
I am so sick of this. The only thing you can always say is Nothing is always true. At least half (probably more) of the fastest NA cars on this board run stock castings. Hell G-force just had a Vetter with a 408 that made 601 on ported LS6 castings. A 408. yeah it had a solid roller, but when you take into consideration the size of the cam compared to some of the hyd roller "street" cars on here that put out 600+ on aftermarket castings it was right along the same size.

I am not bashing AFR, TFS, ET etc, all I am saying is that once a good porter (Greg Good, Larry Meaux, and a FEW others)gets started on a set of heads all bets are out the window.

The above castings have their place. Hell to some people, they are the BUDGET choice. The work the above guys do is NOT cheap, but to some, completely worth it.

JMHO and by the way BLU1, I was not really aiming this at you, it just kind of built up over time.

Oh one more thing, if I had to choose between the 2 choices the OP has given us. I would choose the AFR every day and twice on Sunday.
Old 03-19-2008, 08:37 AM
  #16  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Stang's Bane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mont Belvieu, TX
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by mesospeedy
My TEA stg. 2 243's flow the same as 215 TFS, but I've seen several combos with similar or smaller cams than what I have make a few more horses and alot more torque!
Some of the fastest ls cars period are running a TEA ported stock casting.
Old 03-19-2008, 08:40 AM
  #17  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
ls1leadfoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Greenwood, IN
Posts: 894
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

i have 2 agree on the tsp heads.....i love them with my ms3.....but all things aside....get what you pay for.....afr is a long lasting name and has great product.....
gotta love tsp prices though!!!
Old 03-19-2008, 09:24 AM
  #18  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Sales2@Texas-speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas!
Posts: 5,053
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

PatrickG, thanks for the kind words! I agree with alot of what's been said here and not so much of others. The AFR's are a great head! But to say that it is better than the PRC 5.3's every time is a bit of a stretch. The thick deck on the AFR's makes a great addition to a moderate sized power-adder car! However, with the extra $1000 you spend for the AFR's on a mild cammed street car, you can get into a FAST intake combo, LT headers and true duals, a good start to a beefed up rear-end or a geared 10 bolt, a quality torque convertor like Vigilante, pay off some credit card debt, etc!

We've done consecutive tests on the same car only changing the cylinder heads from AFR to the PRC Stage 2.5 5.3 heads. The results would suprise many! If anyone has any specific questions about the PRC line-up, feel free to call us and we'll be glad to discuss your combo and get you set-up with the cylinder heads and cam that suits you best! And yes, we still offer our customers AFR for certain combos as well as ETP, TFS, etc! We'll shoot you straight!
__________________


Largest Stocking Distributor of LS-x Engines / CHECK OUT OUR NEW WEBSITE!

COMP - FAST - PACESETTER - DIAMOND RACING - EAGLE SPECIALTY PRODUCTS - CALLIES - COMETIC GASKETS
RAM CLUTCHES - MOSER ENGINEERING - KOOK'S HEADERS - ARP - GM BOLTS AND GASKETS - MSD - NGK
POWERBOND - ASP - AND MORE!
Old 03-19-2008, 09:48 AM
  #19  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
deuce_454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JScamaro
I've seen the AFR's being sold for $2185 with dual springs.
where???
Old 03-19-2008, 10:16 AM
  #20  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
deuce_454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

and what about this one NEW Edelbrock Castings
Precision Race Components 200cc Ported Small Runner Cylinder Heads. Fully CNC ported Edelbrock LS1 based cylinder heads!

http://texas-speed.com/shop/item.asp?itemid=667

2.021.575 Valves
PRC Double Valve Springs .660" Lift
Completely Assembled & Setup To Your Specs!!
200cc Intake Runners
62cc Chambers (setup for 3.900" Bore)


Valve Lift Intake
.100" 72
.200" 149
.300" 205
.400" 249
.500" 283
.600" 303
.625" 306



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:32 PM.