Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: Change Cam Size?
Yes, a smaller cam will please..
3
37.50%
Stay right where I am..
4
50.00%
Go big or Go home..
1
12.50%
Voters: 8. You may not vote on this poll

Might Go Smaller....Thoughts?...

Old 03-27-2008, 11:30 PM
  #1  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (41)
 
LS1Silverado05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 2,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Might Go Smaller....Thoughts?...

I run a 231/237* 592/603" 111.5 and have been thinking alot lately of moving down in size to maybe the 224 variety. Whats everyones thoughts? I love the way my cam pulls and sounds, but I sometimes wish for more tame cam that I dont have to rev to 6,500. Should I consider it, or will I be sorry?
Old 03-27-2008, 11:42 PM
  #2  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
02 BLK WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Glen Carbon, IL
Posts: 1,689
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

228R if you change cams
Old 03-27-2008, 11:49 PM
  #3  
Banned
iTrader: (10)
 
TransAmcoupe98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

F that man, stay where u are. No sense in spending extra money to go slower.
Old 03-27-2008, 11:51 PM
  #4  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
red_ryderSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

^^^^agreed. I drive mine everday about 40 miles, no issues and pulls like a ****. No track times till my tranny and 9 inch are in.
Old 03-27-2008, 11:52 PM
  #5  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (41)
 
LS1Silverado05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 2,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TransAmcoupe98
F that man, stay where u are. No sense in spending extra money to go slower.
LOL....Figured I would get plenty of that. The more input the better tho. Keep em coming.
Old 03-28-2008, 12:13 AM
  #6  
On The Tree
 
discostu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i would say that if you dont like it then change it. it is your car so get it the way you want. yes the 224 are smaller but with the right combo they put down some impressive numbers.
Old 03-28-2008, 12:31 AM
  #7  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
sevenstarsfall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Im sure patrick, predator or someone can spec you a custom cam that youd be more then happy with!

A 228R like suggested above might be a good idea as well since it kinda falls inbetween a low 230 duration cam and a 224 cam.....I thought about it but decided to go with a lil bit bigger
Old 03-28-2008, 08:35 AM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
brad8266's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Buy a set of decent heads with small combustion chambers and thin head gaskets. Then the car will pull everywhere.

I have that cam and mine has lots of low end. 385 ft-lbs@3500. I set it up failry high compression/tight quench and it pays off in terms of streetability and low end power.

No sense in going smaller, you just need to optimize your overall combo together.
Old 03-28-2008, 09:41 AM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
TXZ28LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Classified
Posts: 6,164
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

stay with that cam dude!! i would have went with that 231/237 myself, but i just opted for the MTI X1..
Old 03-28-2008, 11:56 AM
  #10  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (41)
 
LS1Silverado05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 2,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by brad8266
Buy a set of decent heads with small combustion chambers and thin head gaskets. Then the car will pull everywhere.

I have that cam and mine has lots of low end. 385 ft-lbs@3500. I set it up failry high compression/tight quench and it pays off in terms of streetability and low end power.

No sense in going smaller, you just need to optimize your overall combo together.
This makes good sense.
Old 03-28-2008, 02:56 PM
  #11  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
1CAMWNDR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

If you are gonna change cams get top notch heads also. With 11:1 CR and the right valve events a 224° to 228° cam will be a great daily driver and still get the numbers at the track with good heads.
Old 03-28-2008, 03:00 PM
  #12  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
RAGENZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Port Hueneme, CA
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Call me dumb but why would you run a smaller cam when you have a 4,000 stall and 4.30 gears? It's not like it is going to matter if it makes more torque from 2-4k
Old 03-28-2008, 03:03 PM
  #13  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (41)
 
LS1Silverado05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 2,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RAGENZ28
Call me dumb but why would you run a smaller cam when you have a 4,000 stall and 4.30 gears? It's not like it is going to matter if it makes more torque from 2-4k
Ever heard of changing your set-up? I know what you're saying though.


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:15 AM.