382 vs H/C cars
08-18-2003, 01:24 AM
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
382 vs H/C cars I ran an 11.8 H/C what kind of times should I expect with the stroker motor?
11.8 was with MTI S2 heads, T1 cam, vig 3600, 3.73,pulley ,freemods, ls6 intake, mac headers , OYP, cut out...new motor MTI 382, S2 heads, R1 cam, and same as above...anyone? also what kind of Hp should I expect with this set up on an A4?
11.8 was with MTI S2 heads, T1 cam, vig 3600, 3.73,pulley ,freemods, ls6 intake, mac headers , OYP, cut out...new motor MTI 382, S2 heads, R1 cam, and same as above...anyone? also what kind of Hp should I expect with this set up on an A4?
08-18-2003, 07:13 AM
#3
Restricted User
iTrader: (43)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 382 vs H/C cars I don't think you will gain that much. I ran a 11.70 @ 115 1.60 60' cam only in the fall. It was a small cam also. Anyway with a big cam, heads and the stroker, I cam only muster up a best of 11.59 @ 116 in the heat 3500' DA. My 60' times are off as well. I should hit 11.00 - 10.9x's in the fall providing I can get traction. Since he already has heads, you may loose a couple tenths with the stroker and a bigger cam but I would seriuous doubt 8/10's unless other mods were done as well.
08-18-2003, 08:24 AM
#4
Re: 382 vs H/C cars I ran 11.61 with MTI Stage 2s and the T1 (1999)
I ran 11.21 with MTI 382, Stage 2s, and T1
I ran 11.08 with MTI 382, Stage 2s, 232/232 cam, and LS6 intake
Heads cam 405 rwhp 390 ft-lbs
382ci, T1, LS1 intake 445 rwhp 440 ft-lbs (stock rearend)
382ci, 232/232, LS6 intake 455 rwhp 445 ft-lbs (pushing 12-bolt rearend)
I ran 11.21 with MTI 382, Stage 2s, and T1
I ran 11.08 with MTI 382, Stage 2s, 232/232 cam, and LS6 intake
Heads cam 405 rwhp 390 ft-lbs
382ci, T1, LS1 intake 445 rwhp 440 ft-lbs (stock rearend)
382ci, 232/232, LS6 intake 455 rwhp 445 ft-lbs (pushing 12-bolt rearend)
08-18-2003, 08:34 AM
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 382 vs H/C cars Thanks guys, I am expecting a low 11, hopefully....maybe with some major weight reduction...thinking of going with 4400YTP and some 4.10s to get 10's I am not sure what my dyno was, but I am going to go find out tomorrow, is 420 ish sound to low for a A4 TA?
Trending Topics
08-18-2003, 10:42 AM
#8
Re: 382 vs H/C cars I wuld say at the track with good traction (et streets, skinnies, etc.), I would imagine you being about .3 faster. The stroker is great on teh street where the torque can make up for less than great starts. Cam'head cars are nearly as fast as strokers at the track from what I can see. I have beat a couple of cam/head cars around here (never lost to a cam head car actually). But when traction is perfect and the rpm's are way up, there isnt that much difference. I like the fact that I can use 3.23gears, DR's, and a mild converter with an auto and nudge out big head/cam cars with 4.10, stick, and ET strets. A stroker definately makes for a more drivable car.
SDB
SDB
08-18-2003, 10:59 AM
#9
Launching!
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Tyler, Texas
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 382 vs H/C cars I plan to do the 392ci all bore by MTI and hope to run mid to high 10s. Jayson says it is better for drag racing than a stroker. I have raced two stroker cars and beat both.
08-19-2003, 09:16 AM
#11
Re: 382 vs H/C cars Also, my previous MTI all-bore 382ci (first all-bore LS1 ever built) was the best all-around engine I've ever owned. Drove great, raced great, and got 24 mpg on the highway. I sold it to a Doctor who put it into his C5 and he put over 40K miles on it the first year alone. Pretty cool!
Tony
Tony
